Cargando…

Side-to-side neurorrhaphy for high-level peripheral nerve injuries

BACKGROUND: The results of peripheral nerve repair, especially for high-level peripheral nerve injuries, have been unsatisfactory. The method of side-to-side neurorrhaphy was developed in our laboratory from 1994 to 2002. This method involves suturing the injured nerve to a nearby donor nerve in a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, ShaoCheng, Ji, Fang, Tong, DaKe, Li, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22231778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1264-2
_version_ 1782224389879627776
author Zhang, ShaoCheng
Ji, Fang
Tong, DaKe
Li, Ming
author_facet Zhang, ShaoCheng
Ji, Fang
Tong, DaKe
Li, Ming
author_sort Zhang, ShaoCheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The results of peripheral nerve repair, especially for high-level peripheral nerve injuries, have been unsatisfactory. The method of side-to-side neurorrhaphy was developed in our laboratory from 1994 to 2002. This method involves suturing the injured nerve to a nearby donor nerve in a side-to-side manner. This study was performed to assess the clinical results of side-to-side neurorrhaphy in patients with high-level peripheral nerve injuries. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with various types of high-level peripheral nerve injuries who underwent side-to-side neurorrhaphy were studied. The British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale was used to assess recovery of nerve function. RESULTS: Average follow-up duration was 3.2 years. Before surgery the patients had a nerve function of M0/S0 to M1/S1. After side-to-side neurorrhaphy, 7 patients had a score of M3/S4, 8 patients a score of M3/S3 and 10 patients a score of M2/S3. The total useful recovery rate (BMRC grade ≥3) was 60% for motor function and 100% for sensory function. Side-to-side neurorrhaphy did not result in any significant loss of donor nerve function. There was significant correlation between both the type of injury and the time interval between injury and surgery and motor nerve function. Age, gender and location of the injured nerve did not correlate with sensory or motor nerve function. CONCLUSION: Side-to-side neurorrhaphy appears to be promising as a feasible method for repair of high-level peripheral nerve injuries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3284681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32846812012-03-08 Side-to-side neurorrhaphy for high-level peripheral nerve injuries Zhang, ShaoCheng Ji, Fang Tong, DaKe Li, Ming Acta Neurochir (Wien) Clinical Article BACKGROUND: The results of peripheral nerve repair, especially for high-level peripheral nerve injuries, have been unsatisfactory. The method of side-to-side neurorrhaphy was developed in our laboratory from 1994 to 2002. This method involves suturing the injured nerve to a nearby donor nerve in a side-to-side manner. This study was performed to assess the clinical results of side-to-side neurorrhaphy in patients with high-level peripheral nerve injuries. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with various types of high-level peripheral nerve injuries who underwent side-to-side neurorrhaphy were studied. The British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale was used to assess recovery of nerve function. RESULTS: Average follow-up duration was 3.2 years. Before surgery the patients had a nerve function of M0/S0 to M1/S1. After side-to-side neurorrhaphy, 7 patients had a score of M3/S4, 8 patients a score of M3/S3 and 10 patients a score of M2/S3. The total useful recovery rate (BMRC grade ≥3) was 60% for motor function and 100% for sensory function. Side-to-side neurorrhaphy did not result in any significant loss of donor nerve function. There was significant correlation between both the type of injury and the time interval between injury and surgery and motor nerve function. Age, gender and location of the injured nerve did not correlate with sensory or motor nerve function. CONCLUSION: Side-to-side neurorrhaphy appears to be promising as a feasible method for repair of high-level peripheral nerve injuries. Springer Vienna 2012-01-05 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3284681/ /pubmed/22231778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1264-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Zhang, ShaoCheng
Ji, Fang
Tong, DaKe
Li, Ming
Side-to-side neurorrhaphy for high-level peripheral nerve injuries
title Side-to-side neurorrhaphy for high-level peripheral nerve injuries
title_full Side-to-side neurorrhaphy for high-level peripheral nerve injuries
title_fullStr Side-to-side neurorrhaphy for high-level peripheral nerve injuries
title_full_unstemmed Side-to-side neurorrhaphy for high-level peripheral nerve injuries
title_short Side-to-side neurorrhaphy for high-level peripheral nerve injuries
title_sort side-to-side neurorrhaphy for high-level peripheral nerve injuries
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22231778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1264-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangshaocheng sidetosideneurorrhaphyforhighlevelperipheralnerveinjuries
AT jifang sidetosideneurorrhaphyforhighlevelperipheralnerveinjuries
AT tongdake sidetosideneurorrhaphyforhighlevelperipheralnerveinjuries
AT liming sidetosideneurorrhaphyforhighlevelperipheralnerveinjuries