Cargando…

Predictors for rTMS response in chronic tinnitus

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been studied as a treatment option for chronic tinnitus for almost 10 years now. Although most of these studies have demonstrated beneficial effects, treatment results show high interindividual variability and yet, little is known a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehner, Astrid, Schecklmann, Martin, Landgrebe, Michael, Kreuzer, Peter M., Poeppl, Timm B., Frank, Elmar, Vielsmeier, Veronika, Kleinjung, Tobias, Rupprecht, Rainer, Langguth, Berthold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22383902
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2012.00011
_version_ 1782224405821128704
author Lehner, Astrid
Schecklmann, Martin
Landgrebe, Michael
Kreuzer, Peter M.
Poeppl, Timm B.
Frank, Elmar
Vielsmeier, Veronika
Kleinjung, Tobias
Rupprecht, Rainer
Langguth, Berthold
author_facet Lehner, Astrid
Schecklmann, Martin
Landgrebe, Michael
Kreuzer, Peter M.
Poeppl, Timm B.
Frank, Elmar
Vielsmeier, Veronika
Kleinjung, Tobias
Rupprecht, Rainer
Langguth, Berthold
author_sort Lehner, Astrid
collection PubMed
description Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been studied as a treatment option for chronic tinnitus for almost 10 years now. Although most of these studies have demonstrated beneficial effects, treatment results show high interindividual variability and yet, little is known about predictors for treatment response. Methods: Data from 538 patients with chronic tinnitus were analyzed. Patients received either low-frequency rTMS over the left temporal cortex (n = 345, 1 Hz, 110% motor threshold, 2000 stimuli/day) or combined temporal and frontal stimulation (n = 193, 110% motor threshold, 2000 stimuli at 20 Hz over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plus 2000 stimuli at 1 Hz over temporal cortex). Numerous demographic, clinical, and audiological variables as well as different tinnitus characteristics were analyzed as potential predictors for treatment outcome, which was defined as change in the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ) score. Results: Both stimulation protocols resulted in a significant decrease of TQ scores. Effect sizes were small, however. In the group receiving combined treatment, patients with comorbid temporomandibular complaints benefited more from rTMS than patients without those complaints. In addition, patients with higher TQ scores at baseline had more pronounced TQ reductions than patients with low TQ baseline scores. Also, patients who had already improved from screening to baseline benefited less than patients without initial improvement. Conclusions: The results from this large sample demonstrate that rTMS shows only small but clinically significant effects in the treatment of chronic tinnitus. There are no good demographic or clinical predictors for treatment outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3284861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32848612012-03-01 Predictors for rTMS response in chronic tinnitus Lehner, Astrid Schecklmann, Martin Landgrebe, Michael Kreuzer, Peter M. Poeppl, Timm B. Frank, Elmar Vielsmeier, Veronika Kleinjung, Tobias Rupprecht, Rainer Langguth, Berthold Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been studied as a treatment option for chronic tinnitus for almost 10 years now. Although most of these studies have demonstrated beneficial effects, treatment results show high interindividual variability and yet, little is known about predictors for treatment response. Methods: Data from 538 patients with chronic tinnitus were analyzed. Patients received either low-frequency rTMS over the left temporal cortex (n = 345, 1 Hz, 110% motor threshold, 2000 stimuli/day) or combined temporal and frontal stimulation (n = 193, 110% motor threshold, 2000 stimuli at 20 Hz over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plus 2000 stimuli at 1 Hz over temporal cortex). Numerous demographic, clinical, and audiological variables as well as different tinnitus characteristics were analyzed as potential predictors for treatment outcome, which was defined as change in the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ) score. Results: Both stimulation protocols resulted in a significant decrease of TQ scores. Effect sizes were small, however. In the group receiving combined treatment, patients with comorbid temporomandibular complaints benefited more from rTMS than patients without those complaints. In addition, patients with higher TQ scores at baseline had more pronounced TQ reductions than patients with low TQ baseline scores. Also, patients who had already improved from screening to baseline benefited less than patients without initial improvement. Conclusions: The results from this large sample demonstrate that rTMS shows only small but clinically significant effects in the treatment of chronic tinnitus. There are no good demographic or clinical predictors for treatment outcome. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3284861/ /pubmed/22383902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2012.00011 Text en Copyright © 2012 Lehner, Schecklmann, Landgrebe, Kreuzer, Poeppl, Frank, Vielsmeier, Kleinjung, Rupprecht and Langguth. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Lehner, Astrid
Schecklmann, Martin
Landgrebe, Michael
Kreuzer, Peter M.
Poeppl, Timm B.
Frank, Elmar
Vielsmeier, Veronika
Kleinjung, Tobias
Rupprecht, Rainer
Langguth, Berthold
Predictors for rTMS response in chronic tinnitus
title Predictors for rTMS response in chronic tinnitus
title_full Predictors for rTMS response in chronic tinnitus
title_fullStr Predictors for rTMS response in chronic tinnitus
title_full_unstemmed Predictors for rTMS response in chronic tinnitus
title_short Predictors for rTMS response in chronic tinnitus
title_sort predictors for rtms response in chronic tinnitus
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22383902
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2012.00011
work_keys_str_mv AT lehnerastrid predictorsforrtmsresponseinchronictinnitus
AT schecklmannmartin predictorsforrtmsresponseinchronictinnitus
AT landgrebemichael predictorsforrtmsresponseinchronictinnitus
AT kreuzerpeterm predictorsforrtmsresponseinchronictinnitus
AT poeppltimmb predictorsforrtmsresponseinchronictinnitus
AT frankelmar predictorsforrtmsresponseinchronictinnitus
AT vielsmeierveronika predictorsforrtmsresponseinchronictinnitus
AT kleinjungtobias predictorsforrtmsresponseinchronictinnitus
AT rupprechtrainer predictorsforrtmsresponseinchronictinnitus
AT langguthberthold predictorsforrtmsresponseinchronictinnitus