Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves
Proteins in the plant apoplast are essential for many physiological processes. We have analysed and compared six different infiltration solutions for proteins contained in the apoplast to recognize the most suitable method for leaves and to establish proteome maps for each extraction. The efficiency...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22192489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-7-48 |
_version_ | 1782224409184960512 |
---|---|
author | Witzel, Katja Shahzad, Muhammad Matros, Andrea Mock, Hans-Peter Mühling, Karl H |
author_facet | Witzel, Katja Shahzad, Muhammad Matros, Andrea Mock, Hans-Peter Mühling, Karl H |
author_sort | Witzel, Katja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Proteins in the plant apoplast are essential for many physiological processes. We have analysed and compared six different infiltration solutions for proteins contained in the apoplast to recognize the most suitable method for leaves and to establish proteome maps for each extraction. The efficiency of protocols was evaluated by comparing the protein patterns resolved by 1-DE and 2-DE, and revealed distinct characteristics for each infiltration solution. Nano-LC-ESI-Q-TOF MS analysis of all fractions was applied to cover all proteins differentially extracted by infiltration solutions and led to the identification of 328 proteins in total in apoplast preparations. The predicted subcellular protein localisation distinguished the examined infiltration solutions in those with high or low amounts of intracellular protein contaminations, and with high or low quantities of secreted proteins. All tested infiltration solution extracted different subsets of proteins, and those implications on apoplast-specific studies are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3284877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32848772012-02-23 Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves Witzel, Katja Shahzad, Muhammad Matros, Andrea Mock, Hans-Peter Mühling, Karl H Plant Methods Methodology Proteins in the plant apoplast are essential for many physiological processes. We have analysed and compared six different infiltration solutions for proteins contained in the apoplast to recognize the most suitable method for leaves and to establish proteome maps for each extraction. The efficiency of protocols was evaluated by comparing the protein patterns resolved by 1-DE and 2-DE, and revealed distinct characteristics for each infiltration solution. Nano-LC-ESI-Q-TOF MS analysis of all fractions was applied to cover all proteins differentially extracted by infiltration solutions and led to the identification of 328 proteins in total in apoplast preparations. The predicted subcellular protein localisation distinguished the examined infiltration solutions in those with high or low amounts of intracellular protein contaminations, and with high or low quantities of secreted proteins. All tested infiltration solution extracted different subsets of proteins, and those implications on apoplast-specific studies are discussed. BioMed Central 2011-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3284877/ /pubmed/22192489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-7-48 Text en Copyright ©2011 Witzel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Witzel, Katja Shahzad, Muhammad Matros, Andrea Mock, Hans-Peter Mühling, Karl H Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves |
title | Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22192489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-7-48 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT witzelkatja comparativeevaluationofextractionmethodsforapoplasticproteinsfrommaizeleaves AT shahzadmuhammad comparativeevaluationofextractionmethodsforapoplasticproteinsfrommaizeleaves AT matrosandrea comparativeevaluationofextractionmethodsforapoplasticproteinsfrommaizeleaves AT mockhanspeter comparativeevaluationofextractionmethodsforapoplasticproteinsfrommaizeleaves AT muhlingkarlh comparativeevaluationofextractionmethodsforapoplasticproteinsfrommaizeleaves |