Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves

Proteins in the plant apoplast are essential for many physiological processes. We have analysed and compared six different infiltration solutions for proteins contained in the apoplast to recognize the most suitable method for leaves and to establish proteome maps for each extraction. The efficiency...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Witzel, Katja, Shahzad, Muhammad, Matros, Andrea, Mock, Hans-Peter, Mühling, Karl H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22192489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-7-48
_version_ 1782224409184960512
author Witzel, Katja
Shahzad, Muhammad
Matros, Andrea
Mock, Hans-Peter
Mühling, Karl H
author_facet Witzel, Katja
Shahzad, Muhammad
Matros, Andrea
Mock, Hans-Peter
Mühling, Karl H
author_sort Witzel, Katja
collection PubMed
description Proteins in the plant apoplast are essential for many physiological processes. We have analysed and compared six different infiltration solutions for proteins contained in the apoplast to recognize the most suitable method for leaves and to establish proteome maps for each extraction. The efficiency of protocols was evaluated by comparing the protein patterns resolved by 1-DE and 2-DE, and revealed distinct characteristics for each infiltration solution. Nano-LC-ESI-Q-TOF MS analysis of all fractions was applied to cover all proteins differentially extracted by infiltration solutions and led to the identification of 328 proteins in total in apoplast preparations. The predicted subcellular protein localisation distinguished the examined infiltration solutions in those with high or low amounts of intracellular protein contaminations, and with high or low quantities of secreted proteins. All tested infiltration solution extracted different subsets of proteins, and those implications on apoplast-specific studies are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3284877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32848772012-02-23 Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves Witzel, Katja Shahzad, Muhammad Matros, Andrea Mock, Hans-Peter Mühling, Karl H Plant Methods Methodology Proteins in the plant apoplast are essential for many physiological processes. We have analysed and compared six different infiltration solutions for proteins contained in the apoplast to recognize the most suitable method for leaves and to establish proteome maps for each extraction. The efficiency of protocols was evaluated by comparing the protein patterns resolved by 1-DE and 2-DE, and revealed distinct characteristics for each infiltration solution. Nano-LC-ESI-Q-TOF MS analysis of all fractions was applied to cover all proteins differentially extracted by infiltration solutions and led to the identification of 328 proteins in total in apoplast preparations. The predicted subcellular protein localisation distinguished the examined infiltration solutions in those with high or low amounts of intracellular protein contaminations, and with high or low quantities of secreted proteins. All tested infiltration solution extracted different subsets of proteins, and those implications on apoplast-specific studies are discussed. BioMed Central 2011-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3284877/ /pubmed/22192489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-7-48 Text en Copyright ©2011 Witzel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Witzel, Katja
Shahzad, Muhammad
Matros, Andrea
Mock, Hans-Peter
Mühling, Karl H
Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves
title Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves
title_full Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves
title_short Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves
title_sort comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22192489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-7-48
work_keys_str_mv AT witzelkatja comparativeevaluationofextractionmethodsforapoplasticproteinsfrommaizeleaves
AT shahzadmuhammad comparativeevaluationofextractionmethodsforapoplasticproteinsfrommaizeleaves
AT matrosandrea comparativeevaluationofextractionmethodsforapoplasticproteinsfrommaizeleaves
AT mockhanspeter comparativeevaluationofextractionmethodsforapoplasticproteinsfrommaizeleaves
AT muhlingkarlh comparativeevaluationofextractionmethodsforapoplasticproteinsfrommaizeleaves