Cargando…

Copy number variation in Williams-Beuren syndrome: suitable diagnostic strategy for developing countries

BACKGROUND: Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS; OMIM 194050) is caused by a hemizygous contiguous gene microdeletion at 7q11.23. Supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS), mental retardation, and overfriendliness comprise typical symptoms of WBS. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is considere...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dutra, Roberta L, Honjo, Rachel S, Kulikowski, Leslie D, Fonseca, Fernanda M, Pieri, Patrícia C, Jehee, Fernanda S, Bertola, Debora R, Kim, Chong A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3285034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22226172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-13
_version_ 1782224444715958272
author Dutra, Roberta L
Honjo, Rachel S
Kulikowski, Leslie D
Fonseca, Fernanda M
Pieri, Patrícia C
Jehee, Fernanda S
Bertola, Debora R
Kim, Chong A
author_facet Dutra, Roberta L
Honjo, Rachel S
Kulikowski, Leslie D
Fonseca, Fernanda M
Pieri, Patrícia C
Jehee, Fernanda S
Bertola, Debora R
Kim, Chong A
author_sort Dutra, Roberta L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS; OMIM 194050) is caused by a hemizygous contiguous gene microdeletion at 7q11.23. Supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS), mental retardation, and overfriendliness comprise typical symptoms of WBS. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is considered the gold standard technique, the microsatellite DNA markers and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) could be used for to confirm the diagnosis of WBS. RESULTS: We have evaluated a total cohort of 88 patients with a suspicion clinical diagnosis of WBS using a collection of five markers (D7S1870, D7S489, D7S613, D7S2476, and D7S489_A) and a commercial MLPA kit (P029). The microdeletion was present in 64 (72.7%) patients and absent in 24 (27.3%) patients. The parental origin of deletion was maternal in 36 of 64 patients (56.3%) paternal in 28 of 64 patients (43.7%). The deletion size was 1.55 Mb in 57 of 64 patients (89.1%) and 1.84 Mb in 7 of 64 patients (10.9%). The results were concordant using both techniques, except for four patients whose microsatellite markers were uninformative. There were no clinical differences in relation to either the size or parental origin of the deletion. CONCLUSION: MLPA was considered a faster and more economical method in a single assay, whereas the microsatellite markers could determine both the size and parental origin of the deletion in WBS. The microsatellite marker and MLPA techniques are effective in deletion detection in WBS, and both methods provide a useful diagnostic strategy mainly for developing countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3285034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32850342012-02-24 Copy number variation in Williams-Beuren syndrome: suitable diagnostic strategy for developing countries Dutra, Roberta L Honjo, Rachel S Kulikowski, Leslie D Fonseca, Fernanda M Pieri, Patrícia C Jehee, Fernanda S Bertola, Debora R Kim, Chong A BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS; OMIM 194050) is caused by a hemizygous contiguous gene microdeletion at 7q11.23. Supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS), mental retardation, and overfriendliness comprise typical symptoms of WBS. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is considered the gold standard technique, the microsatellite DNA markers and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) could be used for to confirm the diagnosis of WBS. RESULTS: We have evaluated a total cohort of 88 patients with a suspicion clinical diagnosis of WBS using a collection of five markers (D7S1870, D7S489, D7S613, D7S2476, and D7S489_A) and a commercial MLPA kit (P029). The microdeletion was present in 64 (72.7%) patients and absent in 24 (27.3%) patients. The parental origin of deletion was maternal in 36 of 64 patients (56.3%) paternal in 28 of 64 patients (43.7%). The deletion size was 1.55 Mb in 57 of 64 patients (89.1%) and 1.84 Mb in 7 of 64 patients (10.9%). The results were concordant using both techniques, except for four patients whose microsatellite markers were uninformative. There were no clinical differences in relation to either the size or parental origin of the deletion. CONCLUSION: MLPA was considered a faster and more economical method in a single assay, whereas the microsatellite markers could determine both the size and parental origin of the deletion in WBS. The microsatellite marker and MLPA techniques are effective in deletion detection in WBS, and both methods provide a useful diagnostic strategy mainly for developing countries. BioMed Central 2012-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3285034/ /pubmed/22226172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-13 Text en Copyright ©2011 Dutra et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dutra, Roberta L
Honjo, Rachel S
Kulikowski, Leslie D
Fonseca, Fernanda M
Pieri, Patrícia C
Jehee, Fernanda S
Bertola, Debora R
Kim, Chong A
Copy number variation in Williams-Beuren syndrome: suitable diagnostic strategy for developing countries
title Copy number variation in Williams-Beuren syndrome: suitable diagnostic strategy for developing countries
title_full Copy number variation in Williams-Beuren syndrome: suitable diagnostic strategy for developing countries
title_fullStr Copy number variation in Williams-Beuren syndrome: suitable diagnostic strategy for developing countries
title_full_unstemmed Copy number variation in Williams-Beuren syndrome: suitable diagnostic strategy for developing countries
title_short Copy number variation in Williams-Beuren syndrome: suitable diagnostic strategy for developing countries
title_sort copy number variation in williams-beuren syndrome: suitable diagnostic strategy for developing countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3285034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22226172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-13
work_keys_str_mv AT dutrarobertal copynumbervariationinwilliamsbeurensyndromesuitablediagnosticstrategyfordevelopingcountries
AT honjorachels copynumbervariationinwilliamsbeurensyndromesuitablediagnosticstrategyfordevelopingcountries
AT kulikowskileslied copynumbervariationinwilliamsbeurensyndromesuitablediagnosticstrategyfordevelopingcountries
AT fonsecafernandam copynumbervariationinwilliamsbeurensyndromesuitablediagnosticstrategyfordevelopingcountries
AT pieripatriciac copynumbervariationinwilliamsbeurensyndromesuitablediagnosticstrategyfordevelopingcountries
AT jeheefernandas copynumbervariationinwilliamsbeurensyndromesuitablediagnosticstrategyfordevelopingcountries
AT bertoladeborar copynumbervariationinwilliamsbeurensyndromesuitablediagnosticstrategyfordevelopingcountries
AT kimchonga copynumbervariationinwilliamsbeurensyndromesuitablediagnosticstrategyfordevelopingcountries