Cargando…

Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: While there is a considerable corpus of theoretical and empirical literature on networks within and outside of the health sector, multiple research questions are yet to be answered. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies of professionals' network structures, identifyin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cunningham, Frances C, Ranmuthugala, Geetha, Plumb, Jennifer, Georgiou, Andrew, Westbrook, Johanna I, Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3285140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22129933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000187
_version_ 1782224458104176640
author Cunningham, Frances C
Ranmuthugala, Geetha
Plumb, Jennifer
Georgiou, Andrew
Westbrook, Johanna I
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_facet Cunningham, Frances C
Ranmuthugala, Geetha
Plumb, Jennifer
Georgiou, Andrew
Westbrook, Johanna I
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_sort Cunningham, Frances C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While there is a considerable corpus of theoretical and empirical literature on networks within and outside of the health sector, multiple research questions are yet to be answered. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies of professionals' network structures, identifying factors associated with network effectiveness and sustainability, particularly in relation to quality of care and patient safety. METHODS: The authors searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science and Business Source Premier from January 1995 to December 2009. RESULTS: A majority of the 26 unique studies identified used social network analysis to examine structural relationships in networks: structural relationships within and between networks, health professionals and their social context, health collaboratives and partnerships, and knowledge sharing networks. Key aspects of networks explored were administrative and clinical exchanges, network performance, integration, stability and influences on the quality of healthcare. More recent studies show that cohesive and collaborative health professional networks can facilitate the coordination of care and contribute to improving quality and safety of care. Structural network vulnerabilities include cliques, professional and gender homophily, and over-reliance on central agencies or individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Effective professional networks employ natural structural network features (eg, bridges, brokers, density, centrality, degrees of separation, social capital, trust) in producing collaboratively oriented healthcare. This requires efficient transmission of information and social and professional interaction within and across networks. For those using networks to improve care, recurring success factors are understanding your network's characteristics, attending to its functioning and investing time in facilitating its improvement. Despite this, there is no guarantee that time spent on networks will necessarily improve patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3285140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32851402012-02-28 Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review Cunningham, Frances C Ranmuthugala, Geetha Plumb, Jennifer Georgiou, Andrew Westbrook, Johanna I Braithwaite, Jeffrey BMJ Qual Saf Systematic Review BACKGROUND: While there is a considerable corpus of theoretical and empirical literature on networks within and outside of the health sector, multiple research questions are yet to be answered. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies of professionals' network structures, identifying factors associated with network effectiveness and sustainability, particularly in relation to quality of care and patient safety. METHODS: The authors searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science and Business Source Premier from January 1995 to December 2009. RESULTS: A majority of the 26 unique studies identified used social network analysis to examine structural relationships in networks: structural relationships within and between networks, health professionals and their social context, health collaboratives and partnerships, and knowledge sharing networks. Key aspects of networks explored were administrative and clinical exchanges, network performance, integration, stability and influences on the quality of healthcare. More recent studies show that cohesive and collaborative health professional networks can facilitate the coordination of care and contribute to improving quality and safety of care. Structural network vulnerabilities include cliques, professional and gender homophily, and over-reliance on central agencies or individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Effective professional networks employ natural structural network features (eg, bridges, brokers, density, centrality, degrees of separation, social capital, trust) in producing collaboratively oriented healthcare. This requires efficient transmission of information and social and professional interaction within and across networks. For those using networks to improve care, recurring success factors are understanding your network's characteristics, attending to its functioning and investing time in facilitating its improvement. Despite this, there is no guarantee that time spent on networks will necessarily improve patient care. BMJ Group 2011-11-30 2012-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3285140/ /pubmed/22129933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000187 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Cunningham, Frances C
Ranmuthugala, Geetha
Plumb, Jennifer
Georgiou, Andrew
Westbrook, Johanna I
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review
title Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review
title_full Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review
title_fullStr Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review
title_short Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review
title_sort health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3285140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22129933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000187
work_keys_str_mv AT cunninghamfrancesc healthprofessionalnetworksasavectorforimprovinghealthcarequalityandsafetyasystematicreview
AT ranmuthugalageetha healthprofessionalnetworksasavectorforimprovinghealthcarequalityandsafetyasystematicreview
AT plumbjennifer healthprofessionalnetworksasavectorforimprovinghealthcarequalityandsafetyasystematicreview
AT georgiouandrew healthprofessionalnetworksasavectorforimprovinghealthcarequalityandsafetyasystematicreview
AT westbrookjohannai healthprofessionalnetworksasavectorforimprovinghealthcarequalityandsafetyasystematicreview
AT braithwaitejeffrey healthprofessionalnetworksasavectorforimprovinghealthcarequalityandsafetyasystematicreview