Cargando…

It can't hurt to ask; a patient-centered quality of service assessment of health canada's medical cannabis policy and program

BACKGROUND: In 2001 Health Canada responded to a series of Ontario court decisions by creating the Marihuana Medical Access Division (MMAD) and the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR). Although Health Canada has conducted a small number of stakeholder consultations, the federal government ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lucas, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3285527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22214382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-9-2
_version_ 1782224480719863808
author Lucas, Philippe
author_facet Lucas, Philippe
author_sort Lucas, Philippe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2001 Health Canada responded to a series of Ontario court decisions by creating the Marihuana Medical Access Division (MMAD) and the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR). Although Health Canada has conducted a small number of stakeholder consultations, the federal government has never polled federally authorized cannabis patients. This study is an attempt to learn more about patient needs, challenges and experiences with the MMAD. METHODS: Launched in the spring of 2007, Quality of Service Assessment of Health Canada's Medical Cannabis Policy and Program pairs a 50 question online survey addressing the personal experiences of patients in the federal cannabis program with 25 semi-guided interviews. Data gathering for this study took place from April 2007 to Jan. 2008, eventually garnering survey responses from 100 federally-authorized users, which at the time represented about 5% of the patients enrolled in Health Canada's program. This paper presents the results of the survey portion of the study. RESULTS: 8% of respondents report getting their cannabis from Health Canada, while 66% grow it for themselves. >50% report that they frequent compassion clubs or dispensaries, which remain illegal and unregulated in Canada. 81% of patients would chose certified organic methods of cultivation; >90% state that not all strains are equally effective at relieving symptoms, and 97% would prefer to obtain cannabis from a source where multiple strains are available. Of the 48 patients polled that had tried the Health Canada cannabis supply, >75% rank it as either "1" or "2" on a scale of 1-10 (with "1" being "very poor", and 10 being "excellent"). DISCUSSION: 72% of respondents report they are either "somewhat" or "totally unsatisfied" with Canada's medical cannabis program. These survey results and relevant court decisions suggest that the MMAR are not meeting the needs of most of the nation's medical cannabis patient community. It is hoped this research will help inform policy changes that will better address the needs of Canada's critically and chronically ill medical cannabis patient population, including the integration of community-based dispensaries into this novel healthcare delivery model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3285527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32855272012-02-24 It can't hurt to ask; a patient-centered quality of service assessment of health canada's medical cannabis policy and program Lucas, Philippe Harm Reduct J Research BACKGROUND: In 2001 Health Canada responded to a series of Ontario court decisions by creating the Marihuana Medical Access Division (MMAD) and the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR). Although Health Canada has conducted a small number of stakeholder consultations, the federal government has never polled federally authorized cannabis patients. This study is an attempt to learn more about patient needs, challenges and experiences with the MMAD. METHODS: Launched in the spring of 2007, Quality of Service Assessment of Health Canada's Medical Cannabis Policy and Program pairs a 50 question online survey addressing the personal experiences of patients in the federal cannabis program with 25 semi-guided interviews. Data gathering for this study took place from April 2007 to Jan. 2008, eventually garnering survey responses from 100 federally-authorized users, which at the time represented about 5% of the patients enrolled in Health Canada's program. This paper presents the results of the survey portion of the study. RESULTS: 8% of respondents report getting their cannabis from Health Canada, while 66% grow it for themselves. >50% report that they frequent compassion clubs or dispensaries, which remain illegal and unregulated in Canada. 81% of patients would chose certified organic methods of cultivation; >90% state that not all strains are equally effective at relieving symptoms, and 97% would prefer to obtain cannabis from a source where multiple strains are available. Of the 48 patients polled that had tried the Health Canada cannabis supply, >75% rank it as either "1" or "2" on a scale of 1-10 (with "1" being "very poor", and 10 being "excellent"). DISCUSSION: 72% of respondents report they are either "somewhat" or "totally unsatisfied" with Canada's medical cannabis program. These survey results and relevant court decisions suggest that the MMAR are not meeting the needs of most of the nation's medical cannabis patient community. It is hoped this research will help inform policy changes that will better address the needs of Canada's critically and chronically ill medical cannabis patient population, including the integration of community-based dispensaries into this novel healthcare delivery model. BioMed Central 2012-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3285527/ /pubmed/22214382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-9-2 Text en Copyright ©2012 Lucas; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lucas, Philippe
It can't hurt to ask; a patient-centered quality of service assessment of health canada's medical cannabis policy and program
title It can't hurt to ask; a patient-centered quality of service assessment of health canada's medical cannabis policy and program
title_full It can't hurt to ask; a patient-centered quality of service assessment of health canada's medical cannabis policy and program
title_fullStr It can't hurt to ask; a patient-centered quality of service assessment of health canada's medical cannabis policy and program
title_full_unstemmed It can't hurt to ask; a patient-centered quality of service assessment of health canada's medical cannabis policy and program
title_short It can't hurt to ask; a patient-centered quality of service assessment of health canada's medical cannabis policy and program
title_sort it can't hurt to ask; a patient-centered quality of service assessment of health canada's medical cannabis policy and program
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3285527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22214382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-9-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lucasphilippe itcanthurttoaskapatientcenteredqualityofserviceassessmentofhealthcanadasmedicalcannabispolicyandprogram