Cargando…

Comparison of Insertional RNA Editing in Myxomycetes

RNA editing describes the process in which individual or short stretches of nucleotides in a messenger or structural RNA are inserted, deleted, or substituted. A high level of RNA editing has been observed in the mitochondrial genome of Physarum polycephalum. The most frequent editing type in Physar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Cai, Frankhouser, David, Bundschuh, Ralf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3285571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22383871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002400
_version_ 1782224483671605248
author Chen, Cai
Frankhouser, David
Bundschuh, Ralf
author_facet Chen, Cai
Frankhouser, David
Bundschuh, Ralf
author_sort Chen, Cai
collection PubMed
description RNA editing describes the process in which individual or short stretches of nucleotides in a messenger or structural RNA are inserted, deleted, or substituted. A high level of RNA editing has been observed in the mitochondrial genome of Physarum polycephalum. The most frequent editing type in Physarum is the insertion of individual Cs. RNA editing is extremely accurate in Physarum; however, little is known about its mechanism. Here, we demonstrate how analyzing two organisms from the Myxomycetes, namely Physarum polycephalum and Didymium iridis, allows us to test hypotheses about the editing mechanism that can not be tested from a single organism alone. First, we show that using the recently determined full transcriptome information of Physarum dramatically improves the accuracy of computational editing site prediction in Didymium. We use this approach to predict genes in the mitochondrial genome of Didymium and identify six new edited genes as well as one new gene that appears unedited. Next we investigate sequence conservation in the vicinity of editing sites between the two organisms in order to identify sites that harbor the information for the location of editing sites based on increased conservation. Our results imply that the information contained within only nine or ten nucleotides on either side of the editing site (a distance previously suggested through experiments) is not enough to locate the editing sites. Finally, we show that the codon position bias in C insertional RNA editing of these two organisms is correlated with the selection pressure on the respective genes thereby directly testing an evolutionary theory on the origin of this codon bias. Beyond revealing interesting properties of insertional RNA editing in Myxomycetes, our work suggests possible approaches to be used when finding sequence motifs for any biological process fails.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3285571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32855712012-03-01 Comparison of Insertional RNA Editing in Myxomycetes Chen, Cai Frankhouser, David Bundschuh, Ralf PLoS Comput Biol Research Article RNA editing describes the process in which individual or short stretches of nucleotides in a messenger or structural RNA are inserted, deleted, or substituted. A high level of RNA editing has been observed in the mitochondrial genome of Physarum polycephalum. The most frequent editing type in Physarum is the insertion of individual Cs. RNA editing is extremely accurate in Physarum; however, little is known about its mechanism. Here, we demonstrate how analyzing two organisms from the Myxomycetes, namely Physarum polycephalum and Didymium iridis, allows us to test hypotheses about the editing mechanism that can not be tested from a single organism alone. First, we show that using the recently determined full transcriptome information of Physarum dramatically improves the accuracy of computational editing site prediction in Didymium. We use this approach to predict genes in the mitochondrial genome of Didymium and identify six new edited genes as well as one new gene that appears unedited. Next we investigate sequence conservation in the vicinity of editing sites between the two organisms in order to identify sites that harbor the information for the location of editing sites based on increased conservation. Our results imply that the information contained within only nine or ten nucleotides on either side of the editing site (a distance previously suggested through experiments) is not enough to locate the editing sites. Finally, we show that the codon position bias in C insertional RNA editing of these two organisms is correlated with the selection pressure on the respective genes thereby directly testing an evolutionary theory on the origin of this codon bias. Beyond revealing interesting properties of insertional RNA editing in Myxomycetes, our work suggests possible approaches to be used when finding sequence motifs for any biological process fails. Public Library of Science 2012-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3285571/ /pubmed/22383871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002400 Text en Chen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Cai
Frankhouser, David
Bundschuh, Ralf
Comparison of Insertional RNA Editing in Myxomycetes
title Comparison of Insertional RNA Editing in Myxomycetes
title_full Comparison of Insertional RNA Editing in Myxomycetes
title_fullStr Comparison of Insertional RNA Editing in Myxomycetes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Insertional RNA Editing in Myxomycetes
title_short Comparison of Insertional RNA Editing in Myxomycetes
title_sort comparison of insertional rna editing in myxomycetes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3285571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22383871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002400
work_keys_str_mv AT chencai comparisonofinsertionalrnaeditinginmyxomycetes
AT frankhouserdavid comparisonofinsertionalrnaeditinginmyxomycetes
AT bundschuhralf comparisonofinsertionalrnaeditinginmyxomycetes