Cargando…
Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR
Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is the method of choice for specific and sensitive quantification of nucleic acids. However, data validation is still a major issue, partially due to the complex effect of PCR inhibition on the results. If undetected PCR inhibition may severely impair the accuracy a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22013160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr778 |
_version_ | 1782224628134969344 |
---|---|
author | Bar, Tzachi Kubista, Mikael Tichopad, Ales |
author_facet | Bar, Tzachi Kubista, Mikael Tichopad, Ales |
author_sort | Bar, Tzachi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is the method of choice for specific and sensitive quantification of nucleic acids. However, data validation is still a major issue, partially due to the complex effect of PCR inhibition on the results. If undetected PCR inhibition may severely impair the accuracy and sensitivity of results. PCR inhibition is addressed by prevention, detection and correction of PCR results. Recently, a new family of computational methods for the detection of PCR inhibition called kinetics outlier detection (KOD) emerged. KOD methods are based on comparison of one or a few kinetic parameters describing a test reaction to those describing a set of reference reactions. Modern KOD can detect PCR inhibition reflected by shift of the amplification curve by merely half a cycle with specificity and sensitivity >90%. Based solely on data analysis, these tools complement measures to improve and control pre-analytics. KOD methods do not require labor and materials, do not affect the reaction accuracy and sensitivity and they can be automated for fast and reliable quantification. This review describes the background of KOD methods, their principles, assumptions, strengths and limitations. Finally, the review provides recommendations how to use KOD and how to evaluate its performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3287174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32871742012-02-27 Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR Bar, Tzachi Kubista, Mikael Tichopad, Ales Nucleic Acids Res Survey and Summary Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is the method of choice for specific and sensitive quantification of nucleic acids. However, data validation is still a major issue, partially due to the complex effect of PCR inhibition on the results. If undetected PCR inhibition may severely impair the accuracy and sensitivity of results. PCR inhibition is addressed by prevention, detection and correction of PCR results. Recently, a new family of computational methods for the detection of PCR inhibition called kinetics outlier detection (KOD) emerged. KOD methods are based on comparison of one or a few kinetic parameters describing a test reaction to those describing a set of reference reactions. Modern KOD can detect PCR inhibition reflected by shift of the amplification curve by merely half a cycle with specificity and sensitivity >90%. Based solely on data analysis, these tools complement measures to improve and control pre-analytics. KOD methods do not require labor and materials, do not affect the reaction accuracy and sensitivity and they can be automated for fast and reliable quantification. This review describes the background of KOD methods, their principles, assumptions, strengths and limitations. Finally, the review provides recommendations how to use KOD and how to evaluate its performance. Oxford University Press 2012-02 2011-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3287174/ /pubmed/22013160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr778 Text en © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Survey and Summary Bar, Tzachi Kubista, Mikael Tichopad, Ales Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR |
title | Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR |
title_full | Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR |
title_fullStr | Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR |
title_short | Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR |
title_sort | validation of kinetics similarity in qpcr |
topic | Survey and Summary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22013160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr778 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartzachi validationofkineticssimilarityinqpcr AT kubistamikael validationofkineticssimilarityinqpcr AT tichopadales validationofkineticssimilarityinqpcr |