Cargando…
Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to compare the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with or without posterior subtenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide (STA) or intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (IVR) for retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). METHODS: Thirty-seven eyes from 3...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22375096 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S29718 |
_version_ | 1782224657770872832 |
---|---|
author | Nakano, Saya Honda, Shigeru Oh, Hideyasu Kita, Mihori Negi, Akira |
author_facet | Nakano, Saya Honda, Shigeru Oh, Hideyasu Kita, Mihori Negi, Akira |
author_sort | Nakano, Saya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to compare the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with or without posterior subtenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide (STA) or intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (IVR) for retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). METHODS: Thirty-seven eyes from 33 consecutive patients with RAP were treated by PDT monotherapy (Group 1), PDT combined with STA (Group 2), or PDT combined with IVR (Group 3). The best-corrected visual acuity, greatest linear dimension, central retinal thickness, and number of treatments were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR) at month 3, 6, and 12 after the initial treatment was better in Group 2 (−0.13, −0.23, and −0.21, respectively) and Group 3 (−0.018, 0.0028, and −0.0067, respectively) than in Group 1 (0.13, 0.19, and 0.23, respectively); Group 1 versus Group 2 was statistically significant (P = 0.018). The mean central retinal thickness was reduced from baseline in all groups, but the reduction amplitude was significantly greater in Group 2 than in Group 1 and Group 3. The mean number of treatments was significantly lower in Group 2 (1.1 ± 0.4) and Group 3 (1.5 ± 0.5) than in Group 1 (2.9 ± 0.9) in the 12 months after the initial treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with STA + PDT may be an effective therapy for RAP lesions over 12 months of follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3287414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32874142012-02-28 Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation Nakano, Saya Honda, Shigeru Oh, Hideyasu Kita, Mihori Negi, Akira Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to compare the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with or without posterior subtenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide (STA) or intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (IVR) for retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). METHODS: Thirty-seven eyes from 33 consecutive patients with RAP were treated by PDT monotherapy (Group 1), PDT combined with STA (Group 2), or PDT combined with IVR (Group 3). The best-corrected visual acuity, greatest linear dimension, central retinal thickness, and number of treatments were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR) at month 3, 6, and 12 after the initial treatment was better in Group 2 (−0.13, −0.23, and −0.21, respectively) and Group 3 (−0.018, 0.0028, and −0.0067, respectively) than in Group 1 (0.13, 0.19, and 0.23, respectively); Group 1 versus Group 2 was statistically significant (P = 0.018). The mean central retinal thickness was reduced from baseline in all groups, but the reduction amplitude was significantly greater in Group 2 than in Group 1 and Group 3. The mean number of treatments was significantly lower in Group 2 (1.1 ± 0.4) and Group 3 (1.5 ± 0.5) than in Group 1 (2.9 ± 0.9) in the 12 months after the initial treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with STA + PDT may be an effective therapy for RAP lesions over 12 months of follow-up. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3287414/ /pubmed/22375096 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S29718 Text en © 2012 Nakano et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nakano, Saya Honda, Shigeru Oh, Hideyasu Kita, Mihori Negi, Akira Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation |
title | Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation |
title_full | Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation |
title_fullStr | Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation |
title_short | Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation |
title_sort | effect of photodynamic therapy (pdt), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with pdt, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with pdt for retinal angiomatous proliferation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22375096 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S29718 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakanosaya effectofphotodynamictherapypdtposteriorsubtenoninjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonidewithpdtandintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabwithpdtforretinalangiomatousproliferation AT hondashigeru effectofphotodynamictherapypdtposteriorsubtenoninjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonidewithpdtandintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabwithpdtforretinalangiomatousproliferation AT ohhideyasu effectofphotodynamictherapypdtposteriorsubtenoninjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonidewithpdtandintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabwithpdtforretinalangiomatousproliferation AT kitamihori effectofphotodynamictherapypdtposteriorsubtenoninjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonidewithpdtandintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabwithpdtforretinalangiomatousproliferation AT negiakira effectofphotodynamictherapypdtposteriorsubtenoninjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonidewithpdtandintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabwithpdtforretinalangiomatousproliferation |