Cargando…

Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to compare the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with or without posterior subtenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide (STA) or intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (IVR) for retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). METHODS: Thirty-seven eyes from 3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakano, Saya, Honda, Shigeru, Oh, Hideyasu, Kita, Mihori, Negi, Akira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22375096
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S29718
_version_ 1782224657770872832
author Nakano, Saya
Honda, Shigeru
Oh, Hideyasu
Kita, Mihori
Negi, Akira
author_facet Nakano, Saya
Honda, Shigeru
Oh, Hideyasu
Kita, Mihori
Negi, Akira
author_sort Nakano, Saya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to compare the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with or without posterior subtenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide (STA) or intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (IVR) for retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). METHODS: Thirty-seven eyes from 33 consecutive patients with RAP were treated by PDT monotherapy (Group 1), PDT combined with STA (Group 2), or PDT combined with IVR (Group 3). The best-corrected visual acuity, greatest linear dimension, central retinal thickness, and number of treatments were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR) at month 3, 6, and 12 after the initial treatment was better in Group 2 (−0.13, −0.23, and −0.21, respectively) and Group 3 (−0.018, 0.0028, and −0.0067, respectively) than in Group 1 (0.13, 0.19, and 0.23, respectively); Group 1 versus Group 2 was statistically significant (P = 0.018). The mean central retinal thickness was reduced from baseline in all groups, but the reduction amplitude was significantly greater in Group 2 than in Group 1 and Group 3. The mean number of treatments was significantly lower in Group 2 (1.1 ± 0.4) and Group 3 (1.5 ± 0.5) than in Group 1 (2.9 ± 0.9) in the 12 months after the initial treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with STA + PDT may be an effective therapy for RAP lesions over 12 months of follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3287414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32874142012-02-28 Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation Nakano, Saya Honda, Shigeru Oh, Hideyasu Kita, Mihori Negi, Akira Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to compare the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with or without posterior subtenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide (STA) or intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (IVR) for retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). METHODS: Thirty-seven eyes from 33 consecutive patients with RAP were treated by PDT monotherapy (Group 1), PDT combined with STA (Group 2), or PDT combined with IVR (Group 3). The best-corrected visual acuity, greatest linear dimension, central retinal thickness, and number of treatments were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR) at month 3, 6, and 12 after the initial treatment was better in Group 2 (−0.13, −0.23, and −0.21, respectively) and Group 3 (−0.018, 0.0028, and −0.0067, respectively) than in Group 1 (0.13, 0.19, and 0.23, respectively); Group 1 versus Group 2 was statistically significant (P = 0.018). The mean central retinal thickness was reduced from baseline in all groups, but the reduction amplitude was significantly greater in Group 2 than in Group 1 and Group 3. The mean number of treatments was significantly lower in Group 2 (1.1 ± 0.4) and Group 3 (1.5 ± 0.5) than in Group 1 (2.9 ± 0.9) in the 12 months after the initial treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with STA + PDT may be an effective therapy for RAP lesions over 12 months of follow-up. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3287414/ /pubmed/22375096 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S29718 Text en © 2012 Nakano et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nakano, Saya
Honda, Shigeru
Oh, Hideyasu
Kita, Mihori
Negi, Akira
Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation
title Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation
title_full Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation
title_fullStr Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation
title_full_unstemmed Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation
title_short Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with PDT, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with PDT for retinal angiomatous proliferation
title_sort effect of photodynamic therapy (pdt), posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with pdt, and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab with pdt for retinal angiomatous proliferation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22375096
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S29718
work_keys_str_mv AT nakanosaya effectofphotodynamictherapypdtposteriorsubtenoninjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonidewithpdtandintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabwithpdtforretinalangiomatousproliferation
AT hondashigeru effectofphotodynamictherapypdtposteriorsubtenoninjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonidewithpdtandintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabwithpdtforretinalangiomatousproliferation
AT ohhideyasu effectofphotodynamictherapypdtposteriorsubtenoninjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonidewithpdtandintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabwithpdtforretinalangiomatousproliferation
AT kitamihori effectofphotodynamictherapypdtposteriorsubtenoninjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonidewithpdtandintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabwithpdtforretinalangiomatousproliferation
AT negiakira effectofphotodynamictherapypdtposteriorsubtenoninjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonidewithpdtandintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabwithpdtforretinalangiomatousproliferation