Cargando…
Genetic signal maximization using environmental regression
Joint analyses of correlated phenotypes in genetic epidemiology studies are common. However, these analyses primarily focus on genetic correlation between traits and do not take into account environmental correlation. We describe a method that optimizes the genetic signal by accounting for stochasti...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22373104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S9-S72 |
_version_ | 1782224771856990208 |
---|---|
author | Melton, Phillip E Kent, Jack W Dyer, Thomas D Almasy, Laura Blangero, John |
author_facet | Melton, Phillip E Kent, Jack W Dyer, Thomas D Almasy, Laura Blangero, John |
author_sort | Melton, Phillip E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Joint analyses of correlated phenotypes in genetic epidemiology studies are common. However, these analyses primarily focus on genetic correlation between traits and do not take into account environmental correlation. We describe a method that optimizes the genetic signal by accounting for stochastic environmental noise through joint analysis of a discrete trait and a correlated quantitative marker. We conducted bivariate analyses where heritability and the environmental correlation between the discrete and quantitative traits were calculated using Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 (GAW17) family data. The resulting inverse value of the environmental correlation between these traits was then used to determine a new β coefficient for each quantitative trait and was constrained in a univariate model. We conducted genetic association tests on 7,087 nonsynonymous SNPs in three GAW17 family replicates for Affected status with the β coefficient fixed for three quantitative phenotypes and compared these to an association model where the β coefficient was allowed to vary. Bivariate environmental correlations were 0.64 (± 0.09) for Q1, 0.798 (± 0.076) for Q2, and −0.169 (± 0.18) for Q4. Heritability of Affected status improved in each univariate model where a constrained β coefficient was used to account for stochastic environmental effects. No genome-wide significant associations were identified for either method but we demonstrated that constraining β for covariates slightly improved the genetic signal for Affected status. This environmental regression approach allows for increased heritability when the β coefficient for a highly correlated quantitative covariate is constrained and increases the genetic signal for the discrete trait. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3287912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32879122012-02-28 Genetic signal maximization using environmental regression Melton, Phillip E Kent, Jack W Dyer, Thomas D Almasy, Laura Blangero, John BMC Proc Proceedings Joint analyses of correlated phenotypes in genetic epidemiology studies are common. However, these analyses primarily focus on genetic correlation between traits and do not take into account environmental correlation. We describe a method that optimizes the genetic signal by accounting for stochastic environmental noise through joint analysis of a discrete trait and a correlated quantitative marker. We conducted bivariate analyses where heritability and the environmental correlation between the discrete and quantitative traits were calculated using Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 (GAW17) family data. The resulting inverse value of the environmental correlation between these traits was then used to determine a new β coefficient for each quantitative trait and was constrained in a univariate model. We conducted genetic association tests on 7,087 nonsynonymous SNPs in three GAW17 family replicates for Affected status with the β coefficient fixed for three quantitative phenotypes and compared these to an association model where the β coefficient was allowed to vary. Bivariate environmental correlations were 0.64 (± 0.09) for Q1, 0.798 (± 0.076) for Q2, and −0.169 (± 0.18) for Q4. Heritability of Affected status improved in each univariate model where a constrained β coefficient was used to account for stochastic environmental effects. No genome-wide significant associations were identified for either method but we demonstrated that constraining β for covariates slightly improved the genetic signal for Affected status. This environmental regression approach allows for increased heritability when the β coefficient for a highly correlated quantitative covariate is constrained and increases the genetic signal for the discrete trait. BioMed Central 2011-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3287912/ /pubmed/22373104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S9-S72 Text en Copyright ©2011 Melton et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Proceedings Melton, Phillip E Kent, Jack W Dyer, Thomas D Almasy, Laura Blangero, John Genetic signal maximization using environmental regression |
title | Genetic signal maximization using environmental regression |
title_full | Genetic signal maximization using environmental regression |
title_fullStr | Genetic signal maximization using environmental regression |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetic signal maximization using environmental regression |
title_short | Genetic signal maximization using environmental regression |
title_sort | genetic signal maximization using environmental regression |
topic | Proceedings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22373104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S9-S72 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meltonphillipe geneticsignalmaximizationusingenvironmentalregression AT kentjackw geneticsignalmaximizationusingenvironmentalregression AT dyerthomasd geneticsignalmaximizationusingenvironmentalregression AT almasylaura geneticsignalmaximizationusingenvironmentalregression AT blangerojohn geneticsignalmaximizationusingenvironmentalregression |