Cargando…
Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography
BACKGROUND: To determine the diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) and repeated FAST in the patients with blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: In this retrospective study we collected the data of all patients from September 2007 to July 2011 with gastrointestinal injury....
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22264345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-7-2 |
_version_ | 1782224779149836288 |
---|---|
author | Mohammadi, Afshin Ghasemi-rad, Mohammad |
author_facet | Mohammadi, Afshin Ghasemi-rad, Mohammad |
author_sort | Mohammadi, Afshin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To determine the diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) and repeated FAST in the patients with blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: In this retrospective study we collected the data of all patients from September 2007 to July 2011 with gastrointestinal injury. The intraoperative outcome was compared with FAST technique and the repeated or delayed sonography. RESULTS: A total number of 1550 patients with blunt abdominal trauma underwent FAST in a period of 4 years in our hospital. Eighty-eight (5.67%) patients were found to have gastrointestinal injury after exploratory laparotomy. Fifty-five (62.5%) patients had isolated gastrointestinal injury and 33 (37.5%) patients had concomitant injury to the other solid organs. In those with isolated gastrointestinal injury, the sensitivity of FAST was 38.5%. Repeated ultrsonography was performed in 34 patients with false negative initial FAST after 12-24 hours. The sensitivity of repeated ultrasonography in negative initial FAST patients in detection of gastrointestinal injury was 85.2% (95% CI, 68.1%, and 94.4%). CONCLUSION: Repeated sonography after 12 to 24 hours in patients with negative initial FAST but sustain abdominal symptom can facilitated a diagnosis of GI tract injury and can be as effective method instead of Computed tomography in developing country. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3287959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32879592012-02-28 Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography Mohammadi, Afshin Ghasemi-rad, Mohammad World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: To determine the diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) and repeated FAST in the patients with blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: In this retrospective study we collected the data of all patients from September 2007 to July 2011 with gastrointestinal injury. The intraoperative outcome was compared with FAST technique and the repeated or delayed sonography. RESULTS: A total number of 1550 patients with blunt abdominal trauma underwent FAST in a period of 4 years in our hospital. Eighty-eight (5.67%) patients were found to have gastrointestinal injury after exploratory laparotomy. Fifty-five (62.5%) patients had isolated gastrointestinal injury and 33 (37.5%) patients had concomitant injury to the other solid organs. In those with isolated gastrointestinal injury, the sensitivity of FAST was 38.5%. Repeated ultrsonography was performed in 34 patients with false negative initial FAST after 12-24 hours. The sensitivity of repeated ultrasonography in negative initial FAST patients in detection of gastrointestinal injury was 85.2% (95% CI, 68.1%, and 94.4%). CONCLUSION: Repeated sonography after 12 to 24 hours in patients with negative initial FAST but sustain abdominal symptom can facilitated a diagnosis of GI tract injury and can be as effective method instead of Computed tomography in developing country. BioMed Central 2012-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3287959/ /pubmed/22264345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-7-2 Text en Copyright ©2012 Mohammadi and Ghasemi-rad; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mohammadi, Afshin Ghasemi-rad, Mohammad Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography |
title | Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography |
title_full | Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography |
title_short | Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography |
title_sort | evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "fast is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22264345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-7-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadiafshin evaluationofgastrointestinalinjuryinbluntabdominaltraumafastisnotreliabletheroleofrepeatedultrasonography AT ghasemiradmohammad evaluationofgastrointestinalinjuryinbluntabdominaltraumafastisnotreliabletheroleofrepeatedultrasonography |