Cargando…

Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography

BACKGROUND: To determine the diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) and repeated FAST in the patients with blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: In this retrospective study we collected the data of all patients from September 2007 to July 2011 with gastrointestinal injury....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammadi, Afshin, Ghasemi-rad, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22264345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-7-2
_version_ 1782224779149836288
author Mohammadi, Afshin
Ghasemi-rad, Mohammad
author_facet Mohammadi, Afshin
Ghasemi-rad, Mohammad
author_sort Mohammadi, Afshin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine the diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) and repeated FAST in the patients with blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: In this retrospective study we collected the data of all patients from September 2007 to July 2011 with gastrointestinal injury. The intraoperative outcome was compared with FAST technique and the repeated or delayed sonography. RESULTS: A total number of 1550 patients with blunt abdominal trauma underwent FAST in a period of 4 years in our hospital. Eighty-eight (5.67%) patients were found to have gastrointestinal injury after exploratory laparotomy. Fifty-five (62.5%) patients had isolated gastrointestinal injury and 33 (37.5%) patients had concomitant injury to the other solid organs. In those with isolated gastrointestinal injury, the sensitivity of FAST was 38.5%. Repeated ultrsonography was performed in 34 patients with false negative initial FAST after 12-24 hours. The sensitivity of repeated ultrasonography in negative initial FAST patients in detection of gastrointestinal injury was 85.2% (95% CI, 68.1%, and 94.4%). CONCLUSION: Repeated sonography after 12 to 24 hours in patients with negative initial FAST but sustain abdominal symptom can facilitated a diagnosis of GI tract injury and can be as effective method instead of Computed tomography in developing country.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3287959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32879592012-02-28 Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography Mohammadi, Afshin Ghasemi-rad, Mohammad World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: To determine the diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) and repeated FAST in the patients with blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: In this retrospective study we collected the data of all patients from September 2007 to July 2011 with gastrointestinal injury. The intraoperative outcome was compared with FAST technique and the repeated or delayed sonography. RESULTS: A total number of 1550 patients with blunt abdominal trauma underwent FAST in a period of 4 years in our hospital. Eighty-eight (5.67%) patients were found to have gastrointestinal injury after exploratory laparotomy. Fifty-five (62.5%) patients had isolated gastrointestinal injury and 33 (37.5%) patients had concomitant injury to the other solid organs. In those with isolated gastrointestinal injury, the sensitivity of FAST was 38.5%. Repeated ultrsonography was performed in 34 patients with false negative initial FAST after 12-24 hours. The sensitivity of repeated ultrasonography in negative initial FAST patients in detection of gastrointestinal injury was 85.2% (95% CI, 68.1%, and 94.4%). CONCLUSION: Repeated sonography after 12 to 24 hours in patients with negative initial FAST but sustain abdominal symptom can facilitated a diagnosis of GI tract injury and can be as effective method instead of Computed tomography in developing country. BioMed Central 2012-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3287959/ /pubmed/22264345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-7-2 Text en Copyright ©2012 Mohammadi and Ghasemi-rad; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mohammadi, Afshin
Ghasemi-rad, Mohammad
Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography
title Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography
title_full Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography
title_fullStr Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography
title_short Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography
title_sort evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "fast is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22264345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-7-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadiafshin evaluationofgastrointestinalinjuryinbluntabdominaltraumafastisnotreliabletheroleofrepeatedultrasonography
AT ghasemiradmohammad evaluationofgastrointestinalinjuryinbluntabdominaltraumafastisnotreliabletheroleofrepeatedultrasonography