Cargando…
Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of single-breath-hold three-dimensional cine b-SSFP (balanced steady-state free precession gradient echo) sequence (3D-cine), accelerated with k-t BLAST (broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique), compared with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP (2D-cine)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3288975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22865424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0056-1 |
_version_ | 1782224840848048128 |
---|---|
author | Maffei, Erica Messalli, Giancarlo Martini, Chiara Rossi, Alexia van Pelt, Niels van Geuns, Robert-Jan Weustink, Annick C. Mollet, Nico R. Nieman, Koen Aldrovandi, Annachiara Imbriaco, Massimo Bogaert, Jan Cademartiri, Filippo |
author_facet | Maffei, Erica Messalli, Giancarlo Martini, Chiara Rossi, Alexia van Pelt, Niels van Geuns, Robert-Jan Weustink, Annick C. Mollet, Nico R. Nieman, Koen Aldrovandi, Annachiara Imbriaco, Massimo Bogaert, Jan Cademartiri, Filippo |
author_sort | Maffei, Erica |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of single-breath-hold three-dimensional cine b-SSFP (balanced steady-state free precession gradient echo) sequence (3D-cine), accelerated with k-t BLAST (broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique), compared with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP (2D-cine) sequence for assessment of left ventricular (LV) function. METHODS: Imaging was performed using 1.5-T MRI (Achieva, Philips, The Netherlands) in 46 patients with different cardiac diseases. Global functional parameters, LV mass, imaging time and reporting time were evaluated and compared in each patient. RESULTS: Functional parameters and mass were significantly different in the two sequences [3D end-diastolic volume (EDV) = 129 ± 44 ml vs 2D EDV = 134 ± 49 ml; 3D end-systolic volume (ESV) = 77 ± 44 ml vs 2D ESV = 73 ± 50 ml; 3D ejection fraction (EF) = 43 ± 15% vs 2D EF = 48 ± 15%; p < 0.05], although an excellent correlation was found for LV EF (r = 0.99). Bland-Altman analysis showed small confidence intervals with no interactions on volumes (EF limits of agreement = 2.7; 7.6; mean bias 5%). Imaging time was significantly lower for 3D-cine sequence (18 ± 1 s vs 95 ± 23 s; p < 0.05), although reporting time was significantly longer for the 3D-cine sequence (29 ± 7 min vs 8 ± 3 min; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 3D-cine sequence can be advocated as an alternative to 2D-cine sequence for LV EF assessment in patients for whom shorter imaging time is desirable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3288975 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32889752012-04-25 Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP Maffei, Erica Messalli, Giancarlo Martini, Chiara Rossi, Alexia van Pelt, Niels van Geuns, Robert-Jan Weustink, Annick C. Mollet, Nico R. Nieman, Koen Aldrovandi, Annachiara Imbriaco, Massimo Bogaert, Jan Cademartiri, Filippo Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of single-breath-hold three-dimensional cine b-SSFP (balanced steady-state free precession gradient echo) sequence (3D-cine), accelerated with k-t BLAST (broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique), compared with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP (2D-cine) sequence for assessment of left ventricular (LV) function. METHODS: Imaging was performed using 1.5-T MRI (Achieva, Philips, The Netherlands) in 46 patients with different cardiac diseases. Global functional parameters, LV mass, imaging time and reporting time were evaluated and compared in each patient. RESULTS: Functional parameters and mass were significantly different in the two sequences [3D end-diastolic volume (EDV) = 129 ± 44 ml vs 2D EDV = 134 ± 49 ml; 3D end-systolic volume (ESV) = 77 ± 44 ml vs 2D ESV = 73 ± 50 ml; 3D ejection fraction (EF) = 43 ± 15% vs 2D EF = 48 ± 15%; p < 0.05], although an excellent correlation was found for LV EF (r = 0.99). Bland-Altman analysis showed small confidence intervals with no interactions on volumes (EF limits of agreement = 2.7; 7.6; mean bias 5%). Imaging time was significantly lower for 3D-cine sequence (18 ± 1 s vs 95 ± 23 s; p < 0.05), although reporting time was significantly longer for the 3D-cine sequence (29 ± 7 min vs 8 ± 3 min; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 3D-cine sequence can be advocated as an alternative to 2D-cine sequence for LV EF assessment in patients for whom shorter imaging time is desirable. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3288975/ /pubmed/22865424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0056-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Maffei, Erica Messalli, Giancarlo Martini, Chiara Rossi, Alexia van Pelt, Niels van Geuns, Robert-Jan Weustink, Annick C. Mollet, Nico R. Nieman, Koen Aldrovandi, Annachiara Imbriaco, Massimo Bogaert, Jan Cademartiri, Filippo Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP |
title | Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP |
title_full | Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP |
title_fullStr | Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP |
title_short | Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP |
title_sort | magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3d k-t blast cine b-ssfp in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2d cine b-ssfp |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3288975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22865424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0056-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maffeierica magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp AT messalligiancarlo magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp AT martinichiara magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp AT rossialexia magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp AT vanpeltniels magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp AT vangeunsrobertjan magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp AT weustinkannickc magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp AT molletnicor magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp AT niemankoen magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp AT aldrovandiannachiara magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp AT imbriacomassimo magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp AT bogaertjan magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp AT cademartirifilippo magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp |