Cargando…

Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of single-breath-hold three-dimensional cine b-SSFP (balanced steady-state free precession gradient echo) sequence (3D-cine), accelerated with k-t BLAST (broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique), compared with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP (2D-cine)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maffei, Erica, Messalli, Giancarlo, Martini, Chiara, Rossi, Alexia, van Pelt, Niels, van Geuns, Robert-Jan, Weustink, Annick C., Mollet, Nico R., Nieman, Koen, Aldrovandi, Annachiara, Imbriaco, Massimo, Bogaert, Jan, Cademartiri, Filippo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3288975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22865424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0056-1
_version_ 1782224840848048128
author Maffei, Erica
Messalli, Giancarlo
Martini, Chiara
Rossi, Alexia
van Pelt, Niels
van Geuns, Robert-Jan
Weustink, Annick C.
Mollet, Nico R.
Nieman, Koen
Aldrovandi, Annachiara
Imbriaco, Massimo
Bogaert, Jan
Cademartiri, Filippo
author_facet Maffei, Erica
Messalli, Giancarlo
Martini, Chiara
Rossi, Alexia
van Pelt, Niels
van Geuns, Robert-Jan
Weustink, Annick C.
Mollet, Nico R.
Nieman, Koen
Aldrovandi, Annachiara
Imbriaco, Massimo
Bogaert, Jan
Cademartiri, Filippo
author_sort Maffei, Erica
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of single-breath-hold three-dimensional cine b-SSFP (balanced steady-state free precession gradient echo) sequence (3D-cine), accelerated with k-t BLAST (broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique), compared with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP (2D-cine) sequence for assessment of left ventricular (LV) function. METHODS: Imaging was performed using 1.5-T MRI (Achieva, Philips, The Netherlands) in 46 patients with different cardiac diseases. Global functional parameters, LV mass, imaging time and reporting time were evaluated and compared in each patient. RESULTS: Functional parameters and mass were significantly different in the two sequences [3D end-diastolic volume (EDV) = 129 ± 44 ml vs 2D EDV = 134 ± 49 ml; 3D end-systolic volume (ESV) = 77 ± 44 ml vs 2D ESV = 73 ± 50 ml; 3D ejection fraction (EF) = 43 ± 15% vs 2D EF = 48 ± 15%; p < 0.05], although an excellent correlation was found for LV EF (r = 0.99). Bland-Altman analysis showed small confidence intervals with no interactions on volumes (EF limits of agreement = 2.7; 7.6; mean bias 5%). Imaging time was significantly lower for 3D-cine sequence (18 ± 1 s vs 95 ± 23 s; p < 0.05), although reporting time was significantly longer for the 3D-cine sequence (29 ± 7 min vs 8 ± 3 min; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 3D-cine sequence can be advocated as an alternative to 2D-cine sequence for LV EF assessment in patients for whom shorter imaging time is desirable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3288975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32889752012-04-25 Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP Maffei, Erica Messalli, Giancarlo Martini, Chiara Rossi, Alexia van Pelt, Niels van Geuns, Robert-Jan Weustink, Annick C. Mollet, Nico R. Nieman, Koen Aldrovandi, Annachiara Imbriaco, Massimo Bogaert, Jan Cademartiri, Filippo Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of single-breath-hold three-dimensional cine b-SSFP (balanced steady-state free precession gradient echo) sequence (3D-cine), accelerated with k-t BLAST (broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique), compared with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP (2D-cine) sequence for assessment of left ventricular (LV) function. METHODS: Imaging was performed using 1.5-T MRI (Achieva, Philips, The Netherlands) in 46 patients with different cardiac diseases. Global functional parameters, LV mass, imaging time and reporting time were evaluated and compared in each patient. RESULTS: Functional parameters and mass were significantly different in the two sequences [3D end-diastolic volume (EDV) = 129 ± 44 ml vs 2D EDV = 134 ± 49 ml; 3D end-systolic volume (ESV) = 77 ± 44 ml vs 2D ESV = 73 ± 50 ml; 3D ejection fraction (EF) = 43 ± 15% vs 2D EF = 48 ± 15%; p < 0.05], although an excellent correlation was found for LV EF (r = 0.99). Bland-Altman analysis showed small confidence intervals with no interactions on volumes (EF limits of agreement = 2.7; 7.6; mean bias 5%). Imaging time was significantly lower for 3D-cine sequence (18 ± 1 s vs 95 ± 23 s; p < 0.05), although reporting time was significantly longer for the 3D-cine sequence (29 ± 7 min vs 8 ± 3 min; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 3D-cine sequence can be advocated as an alternative to 2D-cine sequence for LV EF assessment in patients for whom shorter imaging time is desirable. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3288975/ /pubmed/22865424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0056-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Maffei, Erica
Messalli, Giancarlo
Martini, Chiara
Rossi, Alexia
van Pelt, Niels
van Geuns, Robert-Jan
Weustink, Annick C.
Mollet, Nico R.
Nieman, Koen
Aldrovandi, Annachiara
Imbriaco, Massimo
Bogaert, Jan
Cademartiri, Filippo
Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP
title Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP
title_full Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP
title_fullStr Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP
title_short Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3D k-t BLAST cine b-SSFP in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2D cine b-SSFP
title_sort magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass using a single-breath-hold 3d k-t blast cine b-ssfp in comparison with multiple-breath-hold 2d cine b-ssfp
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3288975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22865424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0056-1
work_keys_str_mv AT maffeierica magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp
AT messalligiancarlo magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp
AT martinichiara magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp
AT rossialexia magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp
AT vanpeltniels magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp
AT vangeunsrobertjan magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp
AT weustinkannickc magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp
AT molletnicor magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp
AT niemankoen magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp
AT aldrovandiannachiara magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp
AT imbriacomassimo magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp
AT bogaertjan magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp
AT cademartirifilippo magneticresonanceassessmentofleftventricularvolumesandmassusingasinglebreathhold3dktblastcinebssfpincomparisonwithmultiplebreathhold2dcinebssfp