Cargando…
Cardiothoracic CT: one-stop-shop procedure? Impact on the management of acute pulmonary embolism
In the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) two groups of patients are traditionally identified, namely the hemodynamically stable and instable groups. However, in the large group of normotensive patients with PE, there seems to be a subgroup of patients with an increased risk of an adverse outcome,...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3289035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23100045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0123-2 |
_version_ | 1782224842453417984 |
---|---|
author | Abrahams-van Doorn, Pauline J. Hartmann, Ieneke J. C. |
author_facet | Abrahams-van Doorn, Pauline J. Hartmann, Ieneke J. C. |
author_sort | Abrahams-van Doorn, Pauline J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) two groups of patients are traditionally identified, namely the hemodynamically stable and instable groups. However, in the large group of normotensive patients with PE, there seems to be a subgroup of patients with an increased risk of an adverse outcome, which might benefit from more aggressive therapy than the current standard therapy with anticoagulants. Risk stratification is a commonly used method to define subgroups of patients with either a high or low risk of an adverse outcome. In this review the clinical parameters and biomarkers of myocardial injury and right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) that have been suggested to play an important role in the risk stratification of PE are described first. Secondly, the use of more direct imaging techniques like echocardiography and CT in the assessment of RVD are discussed, followed by a brief outline of new imaging techniques. Finally, two risk stratification models are proposed, combining the markers of RVD with cardiac biomarkers of ischemia to define whether patients should be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and/or be given thrombolysis, admitted to the medical ward, or be safely treated at home with anticoagulant therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3289035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32890352012-04-25 Cardiothoracic CT: one-stop-shop procedure? Impact on the management of acute pulmonary embolism Abrahams-van Doorn, Pauline J. Hartmann, Ieneke J. C. Insights Imaging Review In the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) two groups of patients are traditionally identified, namely the hemodynamically stable and instable groups. However, in the large group of normotensive patients with PE, there seems to be a subgroup of patients with an increased risk of an adverse outcome, which might benefit from more aggressive therapy than the current standard therapy with anticoagulants. Risk stratification is a commonly used method to define subgroups of patients with either a high or low risk of an adverse outcome. In this review the clinical parameters and biomarkers of myocardial injury and right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) that have been suggested to play an important role in the risk stratification of PE are described first. Secondly, the use of more direct imaging techniques like echocardiography and CT in the assessment of RVD are discussed, followed by a brief outline of new imaging techniques. Finally, two risk stratification models are proposed, combining the markers of RVD with cardiac biomarkers of ischemia to define whether patients should be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and/or be given thrombolysis, admitted to the medical ward, or be safely treated at home with anticoagulant therapy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3289035/ /pubmed/23100045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0123-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Abrahams-van Doorn, Pauline J. Hartmann, Ieneke J. C. Cardiothoracic CT: one-stop-shop procedure? Impact on the management of acute pulmonary embolism |
title | Cardiothoracic CT: one-stop-shop procedure? Impact on the management of acute pulmonary embolism |
title_full | Cardiothoracic CT: one-stop-shop procedure? Impact on the management of acute pulmonary embolism |
title_fullStr | Cardiothoracic CT: one-stop-shop procedure? Impact on the management of acute pulmonary embolism |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiothoracic CT: one-stop-shop procedure? Impact on the management of acute pulmonary embolism |
title_short | Cardiothoracic CT: one-stop-shop procedure? Impact on the management of acute pulmonary embolism |
title_sort | cardiothoracic ct: one-stop-shop procedure? impact on the management of acute pulmonary embolism |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3289035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23100045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0123-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abrahamsvandoornpaulinej cardiothoracicctonestopshopprocedureimpactonthemanagementofacutepulmonaryembolism AT hartmannienekejc cardiothoracicctonestopshopprocedureimpactonthemanagementofacutepulmonaryembolism |