Cargando…
A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females
Scent marking can provide behavioral and physiological information including territory ownership and mate advertisement. It is unknown how mating status and pair cohabitation influence marking by males from different social systems. We compared the highly territorial and monogamous California mouse...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032002 |
_version_ | 1782225009021812736 |
---|---|
author | Becker, Elizabeth A. Petruno, Sarah Marler, Catherine A. |
author_facet | Becker, Elizabeth A. Petruno, Sarah Marler, Catherine A. |
author_sort | Becker, Elizabeth A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Scent marking can provide behavioral and physiological information including territory ownership and mate advertisement. It is unknown how mating status and pair cohabitation influence marking by males from different social systems. We compared the highly territorial and monogamous California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) to the less territorial and promiscuous white-footed mouse (P. leucopus). Single and mated males of both species were assigned to one of the following arenas lined with filter paper: control (unscented arena), male scented (previously scent-marked by a male conspecific), or females present (containing females in small cages). As expected, the territorial P. californicus scent marked and overmarked an unfamiliar male conspecific's scent marks more frequently than P. leucopus. Species differences in responses to novel females were also found based on mating status. The presence of unfamiliar females failed to induce changes in scent marking in pair bonded P. californicus even though virgin males increased marking behavior. Pair bonding appears to reduce male advertisement for novel females. This is in contrast to P. leucopus males that continue to advertise regardless of mating status. Our data suggest that communication through scent-marking can diverge significantly between species based on mating system and that there are physiological mechanisms that can inhibit responsiveness of males to female cues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3290528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32905282012-03-05 A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females Becker, Elizabeth A. Petruno, Sarah Marler, Catherine A. PLoS One Research Article Scent marking can provide behavioral and physiological information including territory ownership and mate advertisement. It is unknown how mating status and pair cohabitation influence marking by males from different social systems. We compared the highly territorial and monogamous California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) to the less territorial and promiscuous white-footed mouse (P. leucopus). Single and mated males of both species were assigned to one of the following arenas lined with filter paper: control (unscented arena), male scented (previously scent-marked by a male conspecific), or females present (containing females in small cages). As expected, the territorial P. californicus scent marked and overmarked an unfamiliar male conspecific's scent marks more frequently than P. leucopus. Species differences in responses to novel females were also found based on mating status. The presence of unfamiliar females failed to induce changes in scent marking in pair bonded P. californicus even though virgin males increased marking behavior. Pair bonding appears to reduce male advertisement for novel females. This is in contrast to P. leucopus males that continue to advertise regardless of mating status. Our data suggest that communication through scent-marking can diverge significantly between species based on mating system and that there are physiological mechanisms that can inhibit responsiveness of males to female cues. Public Library of Science 2012-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3290528/ /pubmed/22393377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032002 Text en Becker et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Becker, Elizabeth A. Petruno, Sarah Marler, Catherine A. A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females |
title | A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females |
title_full | A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females |
title_short | A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females |
title_sort | comparison of scent marking between a monogamous and promiscuous species of peromyscus: pair bonded males do not advertise to novel females |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beckerelizabetha acomparisonofscentmarkingbetweenamonogamousandpromiscuousspeciesofperomyscuspairbondedmalesdonotadvertisetonovelfemales AT petrunosarah acomparisonofscentmarkingbetweenamonogamousandpromiscuousspeciesofperomyscuspairbondedmalesdonotadvertisetonovelfemales AT marlercatherinea acomparisonofscentmarkingbetweenamonogamousandpromiscuousspeciesofperomyscuspairbondedmalesdonotadvertisetonovelfemales AT beckerelizabetha comparisonofscentmarkingbetweenamonogamousandpromiscuousspeciesofperomyscuspairbondedmalesdonotadvertisetonovelfemales AT petrunosarah comparisonofscentmarkingbetweenamonogamousandpromiscuousspeciesofperomyscuspairbondedmalesdonotadvertisetonovelfemales AT marlercatherinea comparisonofscentmarkingbetweenamonogamousandpromiscuousspeciesofperomyscuspairbondedmalesdonotadvertisetonovelfemales |