Cargando…

A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females

Scent marking can provide behavioral and physiological information including territory ownership and mate advertisement. It is unknown how mating status and pair cohabitation influence marking by males from different social systems. We compared the highly territorial and monogamous California mouse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becker, Elizabeth A., Petruno, Sarah, Marler, Catherine A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032002
_version_ 1782225009021812736
author Becker, Elizabeth A.
Petruno, Sarah
Marler, Catherine A.
author_facet Becker, Elizabeth A.
Petruno, Sarah
Marler, Catherine A.
author_sort Becker, Elizabeth A.
collection PubMed
description Scent marking can provide behavioral and physiological information including territory ownership and mate advertisement. It is unknown how mating status and pair cohabitation influence marking by males from different social systems. We compared the highly territorial and monogamous California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) to the less territorial and promiscuous white-footed mouse (P. leucopus). Single and mated males of both species were assigned to one of the following arenas lined with filter paper: control (unscented arena), male scented (previously scent-marked by a male conspecific), or females present (containing females in small cages). As expected, the territorial P. californicus scent marked and overmarked an unfamiliar male conspecific's scent marks more frequently than P. leucopus. Species differences in responses to novel females were also found based on mating status. The presence of unfamiliar females failed to induce changes in scent marking in pair bonded P. californicus even though virgin males increased marking behavior. Pair bonding appears to reduce male advertisement for novel females. This is in contrast to P. leucopus males that continue to advertise regardless of mating status. Our data suggest that communication through scent-marking can diverge significantly between species based on mating system and that there are physiological mechanisms that can inhibit responsiveness of males to female cues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3290528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32905282012-03-05 A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females Becker, Elizabeth A. Petruno, Sarah Marler, Catherine A. PLoS One Research Article Scent marking can provide behavioral and physiological information including territory ownership and mate advertisement. It is unknown how mating status and pair cohabitation influence marking by males from different social systems. We compared the highly territorial and monogamous California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) to the less territorial and promiscuous white-footed mouse (P. leucopus). Single and mated males of both species were assigned to one of the following arenas lined with filter paper: control (unscented arena), male scented (previously scent-marked by a male conspecific), or females present (containing females in small cages). As expected, the territorial P. californicus scent marked and overmarked an unfamiliar male conspecific's scent marks more frequently than P. leucopus. Species differences in responses to novel females were also found based on mating status. The presence of unfamiliar females failed to induce changes in scent marking in pair bonded P. californicus even though virgin males increased marking behavior. Pair bonding appears to reduce male advertisement for novel females. This is in contrast to P. leucopus males that continue to advertise regardless of mating status. Our data suggest that communication through scent-marking can diverge significantly between species based on mating system and that there are physiological mechanisms that can inhibit responsiveness of males to female cues. Public Library of Science 2012-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3290528/ /pubmed/22393377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032002 Text en Becker et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Becker, Elizabeth A.
Petruno, Sarah
Marler, Catherine A.
A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females
title A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females
title_full A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females
title_fullStr A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females
title_short A Comparison of Scent Marking between a Monogamous and Promiscuous Species of Peromyscus: Pair Bonded Males Do Not Advertise to Novel Females
title_sort comparison of scent marking between a monogamous and promiscuous species of peromyscus: pair bonded males do not advertise to novel females
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032002
work_keys_str_mv AT beckerelizabetha acomparisonofscentmarkingbetweenamonogamousandpromiscuousspeciesofperomyscuspairbondedmalesdonotadvertisetonovelfemales
AT petrunosarah acomparisonofscentmarkingbetweenamonogamousandpromiscuousspeciesofperomyscuspairbondedmalesdonotadvertisetonovelfemales
AT marlercatherinea acomparisonofscentmarkingbetweenamonogamousandpromiscuousspeciesofperomyscuspairbondedmalesdonotadvertisetonovelfemales
AT beckerelizabetha comparisonofscentmarkingbetweenamonogamousandpromiscuousspeciesofperomyscuspairbondedmalesdonotadvertisetonovelfemales
AT petrunosarah comparisonofscentmarkingbetweenamonogamousandpromiscuousspeciesofperomyscuspairbondedmalesdonotadvertisetonovelfemales
AT marlercatherinea comparisonofscentmarkingbetweenamonogamousandpromiscuousspeciesofperomyscuspairbondedmalesdonotadvertisetonovelfemales