Cargando…

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials in the Treatment of Human Brucellosis

BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a persistent health problem in many developing countries throughout the world, and the search for simple and effective treatment continues to be of great importance. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A search was conducted in MEDLINE and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solís García del Pozo, Julián, Solera, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032090
_version_ 1782225011107430400
author Solís García del Pozo, Julián
Solera, Javier
author_facet Solís García del Pozo, Julián
Solera, Javier
author_sort Solís García del Pozo, Julián
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a persistent health problem in many developing countries throughout the world, and the search for simple and effective treatment continues to be of great importance. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A search was conducted in MEDLINE and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Clinical trials published from 1985 to present that assess different antimicrobial regimens in cases of documented acute uncomplicated human brucellosis were included. The primary outcomes were relapse, therapeutic failure, combined variable of relapse and therapeutic failure, and adverse effect rates. A meta-analysis with a fixed effect model was performed and odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A random effect model was used when significant heterogeneity between studies was verified. Comparison of combined doxycycline and rifampicin with a combination of doxycycline and streptomycin favors the latter regimen (OR = 3.17; CI95% = 2.05–4.91). There were no significant differences between combined doxycycline-streptomycin and combined doxycycline-gentamicin (OR = 1.89; CI95% = 0.81–4.39). Treatment with rifampicin and quinolones was similar to combined doxycycline-rifampicin (OR = 1.23; CI95% = 0.63–2.40). Only one study assessed triple therapy with aminoglycoside-doxycycline-rifampicin and only included patients with uncomplicated brucellosis. Thus this approach cannot be considered the therapy of choice until further studies have been performed. Combined doxycycline/co-trimoxazole or doxycycline monotherapy could represent a cost-effective alternative in certain patient groups, and further studies are needed in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Although the preferred treatment in uncomplicated human brucellosis is doxycycline-aminoglycoside combination, other treatments based on oral regimens or monotherapy should not be rejected until they are better studied. Triple therapy should not be considered the current treatment of choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3290537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32905372012-03-05 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials in the Treatment of Human Brucellosis Solís García del Pozo, Julián Solera, Javier PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a persistent health problem in many developing countries throughout the world, and the search for simple and effective treatment continues to be of great importance. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A search was conducted in MEDLINE and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Clinical trials published from 1985 to present that assess different antimicrobial regimens in cases of documented acute uncomplicated human brucellosis were included. The primary outcomes were relapse, therapeutic failure, combined variable of relapse and therapeutic failure, and adverse effect rates. A meta-analysis with a fixed effect model was performed and odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A random effect model was used when significant heterogeneity between studies was verified. Comparison of combined doxycycline and rifampicin with a combination of doxycycline and streptomycin favors the latter regimen (OR = 3.17; CI95% = 2.05–4.91). There were no significant differences between combined doxycycline-streptomycin and combined doxycycline-gentamicin (OR = 1.89; CI95% = 0.81–4.39). Treatment with rifampicin and quinolones was similar to combined doxycycline-rifampicin (OR = 1.23; CI95% = 0.63–2.40). Only one study assessed triple therapy with aminoglycoside-doxycycline-rifampicin and only included patients with uncomplicated brucellosis. Thus this approach cannot be considered the therapy of choice until further studies have been performed. Combined doxycycline/co-trimoxazole or doxycycline monotherapy could represent a cost-effective alternative in certain patient groups, and further studies are needed in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Although the preferred treatment in uncomplicated human brucellosis is doxycycline-aminoglycoside combination, other treatments based on oral regimens or monotherapy should not be rejected until they are better studied. Triple therapy should not be considered the current treatment of choice. Public Library of Science 2012-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3290537/ /pubmed/22393379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032090 Text en Solís García del Pozo, Solera. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Solís García del Pozo, Julián
Solera, Javier
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials in the Treatment of Human Brucellosis
title Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials in the Treatment of Human Brucellosis
title_full Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials in the Treatment of Human Brucellosis
title_fullStr Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials in the Treatment of Human Brucellosis
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials in the Treatment of Human Brucellosis
title_short Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials in the Treatment of Human Brucellosis
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032090
work_keys_str_mv AT solisgarciadelpozojulian systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrialsinthetreatmentofhumanbrucellosis
AT solerajavier systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrialsinthetreatmentofhumanbrucellosis