Cargando…

Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND: The interest in prognostic reviews is increasing, but to properly review existing evidence an accurate search filer for finding prediction research is needed. The aim of this paper was to validate and update two previously introduced search filters for finding prediction research in Medl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geersing, Geert-Jan, Bouwmeester, Walter, Zuithoff, Peter, Spijker, Rene, Leeflang, Mariska, Moons, Karel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032844
_version_ 1782225026270887936
author Geersing, Geert-Jan
Bouwmeester, Walter
Zuithoff, Peter
Spijker, Rene
Leeflang, Mariska
Moons, Karel
author_facet Geersing, Geert-Jan
Bouwmeester, Walter
Zuithoff, Peter
Spijker, Rene
Leeflang, Mariska
Moons, Karel
author_sort Geersing, Geert-Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The interest in prognostic reviews is increasing, but to properly review existing evidence an accurate search filer for finding prediction research is needed. The aim of this paper was to validate and update two previously introduced search filters for finding prediction research in Medline: the Ingui filter and the Haynes Broad filter. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Based on a hand search of 6 general journals in 2008 we constructed two sets of papers. Set 1 consisted of prediction research papers (n = 71), and set 2 consisted of the remaining papers (n = 1133). Both search filters were validated in two ways, using diagnostic accuracy measures as performance measures. First, we compared studies in set 1 (reference) with studies retrieved by the search strategies as applied in Medline. Second, we compared studies from 4 published systematic reviews (reference) with studies retrieved by the search filter as applied in Medline. Next – using word frequency methods – we constructed an additional search string for finding prediction research. Both search filters were good in identifying clinical prediction models: sensitivity ranged from 0.94 to 1.0 using our hand search as reference, and 0.78 to 0.89 using the systematic reviews as reference. This latter performance measure even increased to around 0.95 (range 0.90 to 0.97) when either search filter was combined with the additional string that we developed. Retrieval rate of explorative prediction research was poor, both using our hand search or our systematic review as reference, and even combined with our additional search string: sensitivity ranged from 0.44 to 0.85. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Explorative prediction research is difficult to find in Medline, using any of the currently available search filters. Yet, application of either the Ingui filter or the Haynes broad filter results in a very low number missed clinical prediction model studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3290602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32906022012-03-05 Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews Geersing, Geert-Jan Bouwmeester, Walter Zuithoff, Peter Spijker, Rene Leeflang, Mariska Moons, Karel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The interest in prognostic reviews is increasing, but to properly review existing evidence an accurate search filer for finding prediction research is needed. The aim of this paper was to validate and update two previously introduced search filters for finding prediction research in Medline: the Ingui filter and the Haynes Broad filter. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Based on a hand search of 6 general journals in 2008 we constructed two sets of papers. Set 1 consisted of prediction research papers (n = 71), and set 2 consisted of the remaining papers (n = 1133). Both search filters were validated in two ways, using diagnostic accuracy measures as performance measures. First, we compared studies in set 1 (reference) with studies retrieved by the search strategies as applied in Medline. Second, we compared studies from 4 published systematic reviews (reference) with studies retrieved by the search filter as applied in Medline. Next – using word frequency methods – we constructed an additional search string for finding prediction research. Both search filters were good in identifying clinical prediction models: sensitivity ranged from 0.94 to 1.0 using our hand search as reference, and 0.78 to 0.89 using the systematic reviews as reference. This latter performance measure even increased to around 0.95 (range 0.90 to 0.97) when either search filter was combined with the additional string that we developed. Retrieval rate of explorative prediction research was poor, both using our hand search or our systematic review as reference, and even combined with our additional search string: sensitivity ranged from 0.44 to 0.85. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Explorative prediction research is difficult to find in Medline, using any of the currently available search filters. Yet, application of either the Ingui filter or the Haynes broad filter results in a very low number missed clinical prediction model studies. Public Library of Science 2012-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3290602/ /pubmed/22393453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032844 Text en Geersing et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Geersing, Geert-Jan
Bouwmeester, Walter
Zuithoff, Peter
Spijker, Rene
Leeflang, Mariska
Moons, Karel
Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews
title Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews
title_full Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews
title_fullStr Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews
title_full_unstemmed Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews
title_short Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews
title_sort search filters for finding prognostic and diagnostic prediction studies in medline to enhance systematic reviews
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22393453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032844
work_keys_str_mv AT geersinggeertjan searchfiltersforfindingprognosticanddiagnosticpredictionstudiesinmedlinetoenhancesystematicreviews
AT bouwmeesterwalter searchfiltersforfindingprognosticanddiagnosticpredictionstudiesinmedlinetoenhancesystematicreviews
AT zuithoffpeter searchfiltersforfindingprognosticanddiagnosticpredictionstudiesinmedlinetoenhancesystematicreviews
AT spijkerrene searchfiltersforfindingprognosticanddiagnosticpredictionstudiesinmedlinetoenhancesystematicreviews
AT leeflangmariska searchfiltersforfindingprognosticanddiagnosticpredictionstudiesinmedlinetoenhancesystematicreviews
AT moonskarel searchfiltersforfindingprognosticanddiagnosticpredictionstudiesinmedlinetoenhancesystematicreviews