Cargando…

A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model

Background. Intravesical pressure (IAP(ivp)) measurement is considered to be the gold standard for assessment of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). This study evaluated a new minimally invasive IAP monitoring device (CiMON) against three other devices in a wide range of clinically relevant IAP and in d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wauters, Joost, Spincemaille, Liesbeth, Dieudonne, Anne-Sophie, Van Zwam, Kenny, Wilmer, Alexander, Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22454765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/181563
_version_ 1782225064978022400
author Wauters, Joost
Spincemaille, Liesbeth
Dieudonne, Anne-Sophie
Van Zwam, Kenny
Wilmer, Alexander
Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.
author_facet Wauters, Joost
Spincemaille, Liesbeth
Dieudonne, Anne-Sophie
Van Zwam, Kenny
Wilmer, Alexander
Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.
author_sort Wauters, Joost
collection PubMed
description Background. Intravesical pressure (IAP(ivp)) measurement is considered to be the gold standard for assessment of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). This study evaluated a new minimally invasive IAP monitoring device (CiMON) against three other devices in a wide range of clinically relevant IAP and in different body positions in healthy pigs. Methods. The CiMON catheter (IAP(CiM)) and another balloon-tipped catheter (IAP(spie)) were positioned into the stomach. Fluid-filled catheters were used for direct intraperitoneal (IAP(dir)) and IAP(ivp) measurement. Both in supine and 25° head-of-bed positions, IAP was increased from baseline to 30 mmHg. At every IAP level, 4 IAP measurements were recorded simultaneously. Mean differences and the limits of agreement were calculated. Results. Bias between IAP(CiM) and IAP(spie) was nearly zero with very good agreement, both in supine and 25° position. In supine position, IAP(CiM) slightly overestimated IAP(ivp) and IAP(dir) by 1.5 and 2.1 mmHg with reasonable agreement. In 25° position, IAP(CiM) underestimated IAP(ivp) and IAP(dir) by 1.0 and 0.5 mmHg, again with reasonable agreement. Conclusions. Agreement between IAP(CiM) and IAP(spie) was very good, while good-to-moderate agreement exists between IAP(CiM) and IAP(dir) or IAP(ivp). Simplicity, continuous monitoring, and the combination with a feeding tube should lead to further clinical studies, evaluating this new CiMON device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3290895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32908952012-03-27 A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model Wauters, Joost Spincemaille, Liesbeth Dieudonne, Anne-Sophie Van Zwam, Kenny Wilmer, Alexander Malbrain, Manu L. N. G. Crit Care Res Pract Research Article Background. Intravesical pressure (IAP(ivp)) measurement is considered to be the gold standard for assessment of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). This study evaluated a new minimally invasive IAP monitoring device (CiMON) against three other devices in a wide range of clinically relevant IAP and in different body positions in healthy pigs. Methods. The CiMON catheter (IAP(CiM)) and another balloon-tipped catheter (IAP(spie)) were positioned into the stomach. Fluid-filled catheters were used for direct intraperitoneal (IAP(dir)) and IAP(ivp) measurement. Both in supine and 25° head-of-bed positions, IAP was increased from baseline to 30 mmHg. At every IAP level, 4 IAP measurements were recorded simultaneously. Mean differences and the limits of agreement were calculated. Results. Bias between IAP(CiM) and IAP(spie) was nearly zero with very good agreement, both in supine and 25° position. In supine position, IAP(CiM) slightly overestimated IAP(ivp) and IAP(dir) by 1.5 and 2.1 mmHg with reasonable agreement. In 25° position, IAP(CiM) underestimated IAP(ivp) and IAP(dir) by 1.0 and 0.5 mmHg, again with reasonable agreement. Conclusions. Agreement between IAP(CiM) and IAP(spie) was very good, while good-to-moderate agreement exists between IAP(CiM) and IAP(dir) or IAP(ivp). Simplicity, continuous monitoring, and the combination with a feeding tube should lead to further clinical studies, evaluating this new CiMON device. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3290895/ /pubmed/22454765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/181563 Text en Copyright © 2012 Joost Wauters et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wauters, Joost
Spincemaille, Liesbeth
Dieudonne, Anne-Sophie
Van Zwam, Kenny
Wilmer, Alexander
Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.
A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model
title A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model
title_full A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model
title_fullStr A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model
title_short A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model
title_sort novel method (cimon) for continuous intra-abdominal pressure monitoring: pilot test in a pig model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22454765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/181563
work_keys_str_mv AT wautersjoost anovelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel
AT spincemailleliesbeth anovelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel
AT dieudonneannesophie anovelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel
AT vanzwamkenny anovelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel
AT wilmeralexander anovelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel
AT malbrainmanulng anovelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel
AT wautersjoost novelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel
AT spincemailleliesbeth novelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel
AT dieudonneannesophie novelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel
AT vanzwamkenny novelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel
AT wilmeralexander novelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel
AT malbrainmanulng novelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel