Cargando…
A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model
Background. Intravesical pressure (IAP(ivp)) measurement is considered to be the gold standard for assessment of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). This study evaluated a new minimally invasive IAP monitoring device (CiMON) against three other devices in a wide range of clinically relevant IAP and in d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22454765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/181563 |
_version_ | 1782225064978022400 |
---|---|
author | Wauters, Joost Spincemaille, Liesbeth Dieudonne, Anne-Sophie Van Zwam, Kenny Wilmer, Alexander Malbrain, Manu L. N. G. |
author_facet | Wauters, Joost Spincemaille, Liesbeth Dieudonne, Anne-Sophie Van Zwam, Kenny Wilmer, Alexander Malbrain, Manu L. N. G. |
author_sort | Wauters, Joost |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Intravesical pressure (IAP(ivp)) measurement is considered to be the gold standard for assessment of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). This study evaluated a new minimally invasive IAP monitoring device (CiMON) against three other devices in a wide range of clinically relevant IAP and in different body positions in healthy pigs. Methods. The CiMON catheter (IAP(CiM)) and another balloon-tipped catheter (IAP(spie)) were positioned into the stomach. Fluid-filled catheters were used for direct intraperitoneal (IAP(dir)) and IAP(ivp) measurement. Both in supine and 25° head-of-bed positions, IAP was increased from baseline to 30 mmHg. At every IAP level, 4 IAP measurements were recorded simultaneously. Mean differences and the limits of agreement were calculated. Results. Bias between IAP(CiM) and IAP(spie) was nearly zero with very good agreement, both in supine and 25° position. In supine position, IAP(CiM) slightly overestimated IAP(ivp) and IAP(dir) by 1.5 and 2.1 mmHg with reasonable agreement. In 25° position, IAP(CiM) underestimated IAP(ivp) and IAP(dir) by 1.0 and 0.5 mmHg, again with reasonable agreement. Conclusions. Agreement between IAP(CiM) and IAP(spie) was very good, while good-to-moderate agreement exists between IAP(CiM) and IAP(dir) or IAP(ivp). Simplicity, continuous monitoring, and the combination with a feeding tube should lead to further clinical studies, evaluating this new CiMON device. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3290895 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32908952012-03-27 A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model Wauters, Joost Spincemaille, Liesbeth Dieudonne, Anne-Sophie Van Zwam, Kenny Wilmer, Alexander Malbrain, Manu L. N. G. Crit Care Res Pract Research Article Background. Intravesical pressure (IAP(ivp)) measurement is considered to be the gold standard for assessment of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). This study evaluated a new minimally invasive IAP monitoring device (CiMON) against three other devices in a wide range of clinically relevant IAP and in different body positions in healthy pigs. Methods. The CiMON catheter (IAP(CiM)) and another balloon-tipped catheter (IAP(spie)) were positioned into the stomach. Fluid-filled catheters were used for direct intraperitoneal (IAP(dir)) and IAP(ivp) measurement. Both in supine and 25° head-of-bed positions, IAP was increased from baseline to 30 mmHg. At every IAP level, 4 IAP measurements were recorded simultaneously. Mean differences and the limits of agreement were calculated. Results. Bias between IAP(CiM) and IAP(spie) was nearly zero with very good agreement, both in supine and 25° position. In supine position, IAP(CiM) slightly overestimated IAP(ivp) and IAP(dir) by 1.5 and 2.1 mmHg with reasonable agreement. In 25° position, IAP(CiM) underestimated IAP(ivp) and IAP(dir) by 1.0 and 0.5 mmHg, again with reasonable agreement. Conclusions. Agreement between IAP(CiM) and IAP(spie) was very good, while good-to-moderate agreement exists between IAP(CiM) and IAP(dir) or IAP(ivp). Simplicity, continuous monitoring, and the combination with a feeding tube should lead to further clinical studies, evaluating this new CiMON device. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3290895/ /pubmed/22454765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/181563 Text en Copyright © 2012 Joost Wauters et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wauters, Joost Spincemaille, Liesbeth Dieudonne, Anne-Sophie Van Zwam, Kenny Wilmer, Alexander Malbrain, Manu L. N. G. A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model |
title | A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model |
title_full | A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model |
title_fullStr | A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model |
title_full_unstemmed | A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model |
title_short | A Novel Method (CiMON) for Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Pilot Test in a Pig Model |
title_sort | novel method (cimon) for continuous intra-abdominal pressure monitoring: pilot test in a pig model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22454765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/181563 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wautersjoost anovelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel AT spincemailleliesbeth anovelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel AT dieudonneannesophie anovelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel AT vanzwamkenny anovelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel AT wilmeralexander anovelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel AT malbrainmanulng anovelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel AT wautersjoost novelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel AT spincemailleliesbeth novelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel AT dieudonneannesophie novelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel AT vanzwamkenny novelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel AT wilmeralexander novelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel AT malbrainmanulng novelmethodcimonforcontinuousintraabdominalpressuremonitoringpilottestinapigmodel |