Cargando…

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was isolated from nares of 27/417 (6.5%) attendees at an international veterinary conference: 23/345 (7.0%) veterinarians, 4/34 (12.0%) technicians, and 0/38 others. Colonization was more common for large-animal (15/96, 15.6%) than small-animal pers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanselman, Beth A., Kruth, Steve A., Rousseau, Joyce, Low, Donald E., Willey, Barbara M., McGeer, Allison, Weese, J. Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17326947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1212.060231
_version_ 1782225110379266048
author Hanselman, Beth A.
Kruth, Steve A.
Rousseau, Joyce
Low, Donald E.
Willey, Barbara M.
McGeer, Allison
Weese, J. Scott
author_facet Hanselman, Beth A.
Kruth, Steve A.
Rousseau, Joyce
Low, Donald E.
Willey, Barbara M.
McGeer, Allison
Weese, J. Scott
author_sort Hanselman, Beth A.
collection PubMed
description Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was isolated from nares of 27/417 (6.5%) attendees at an international veterinary conference: 23/345 (7.0%) veterinarians, 4/34 (12.0%) technicians, and 0/38 others. Colonization was more common for large-animal (15/96, 15.6%) than small-animal personnel (12/271, 4.4%) or those with no animal patient contact (0/50) (p<0.001). Large-animal practice was the only variable significantly associated with colonization (odds ratio 2.9; 95% confidence interval 1.2–6.6). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis identified 2 predominant clones with similar distribution among veterinarians as previously reported for horses and companion animals. Canadian epidemic MRSA-2 (CMRSA) was isolated from 11 small-animal and 2 large-animal personnel from the United States (n = 12) and Germany (n = 1). In contrast, CMRSA-5 was isolated exclusively from large-animal personnel (p<0.001) in the United States (n = 10), United Kingdom (n = 2), and Denmark (n = 1). MRSA colonization may be an occupational risk for veterinary professionals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3291342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32913422012-03-05 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel Hanselman, Beth A. Kruth, Steve A. Rousseau, Joyce Low, Donald E. Willey, Barbara M. McGeer, Allison Weese, J. Scott Emerg Infect Dis Research Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was isolated from nares of 27/417 (6.5%) attendees at an international veterinary conference: 23/345 (7.0%) veterinarians, 4/34 (12.0%) technicians, and 0/38 others. Colonization was more common for large-animal (15/96, 15.6%) than small-animal personnel (12/271, 4.4%) or those with no animal patient contact (0/50) (p<0.001). Large-animal practice was the only variable significantly associated with colonization (odds ratio 2.9; 95% confidence interval 1.2–6.6). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis identified 2 predominant clones with similar distribution among veterinarians as previously reported for horses and companion animals. Canadian epidemic MRSA-2 (CMRSA) was isolated from 11 small-animal and 2 large-animal personnel from the United States (n = 12) and Germany (n = 1). In contrast, CMRSA-5 was isolated exclusively from large-animal personnel (p<0.001) in the United States (n = 10), United Kingdom (n = 2), and Denmark (n = 1). MRSA colonization may be an occupational risk for veterinary professionals. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3291342/ /pubmed/17326947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1212.060231 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hanselman, Beth A.
Kruth, Steve A.
Rousseau, Joyce
Low, Donald E.
Willey, Barbara M.
McGeer, Allison
Weese, J. Scott
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel
title Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel
title_full Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel
title_fullStr Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel
title_full_unstemmed Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel
title_short Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel
title_sort methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus colonization in veterinary personnel
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17326947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1212.060231
work_keys_str_mv AT hanselmanbetha methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel
AT kruthstevea methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel
AT rousseaujoyce methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel
AT lowdonalde methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel
AT willeybarbaram methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel
AT mcgeerallison methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel
AT weesejscott methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel