Cargando…
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was isolated from nares of 27/417 (6.5%) attendees at an international veterinary conference: 23/345 (7.0%) veterinarians, 4/34 (12.0%) technicians, and 0/38 others. Colonization was more common for large-animal (15/96, 15.6%) than small-animal pers...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17326947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1212.060231 |
_version_ | 1782225110379266048 |
---|---|
author | Hanselman, Beth A. Kruth, Steve A. Rousseau, Joyce Low, Donald E. Willey, Barbara M. McGeer, Allison Weese, J. Scott |
author_facet | Hanselman, Beth A. Kruth, Steve A. Rousseau, Joyce Low, Donald E. Willey, Barbara M. McGeer, Allison Weese, J. Scott |
author_sort | Hanselman, Beth A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was isolated from nares of 27/417 (6.5%) attendees at an international veterinary conference: 23/345 (7.0%) veterinarians, 4/34 (12.0%) technicians, and 0/38 others. Colonization was more common for large-animal (15/96, 15.6%) than small-animal personnel (12/271, 4.4%) or those with no animal patient contact (0/50) (p<0.001). Large-animal practice was the only variable significantly associated with colonization (odds ratio 2.9; 95% confidence interval 1.2–6.6). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis identified 2 predominant clones with similar distribution among veterinarians as previously reported for horses and companion animals. Canadian epidemic MRSA-2 (CMRSA) was isolated from 11 small-animal and 2 large-animal personnel from the United States (n = 12) and Germany (n = 1). In contrast, CMRSA-5 was isolated exclusively from large-animal personnel (p<0.001) in the United States (n = 10), United Kingdom (n = 2), and Denmark (n = 1). MRSA colonization may be an occupational risk for veterinary professionals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3291342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32913422012-03-05 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel Hanselman, Beth A. Kruth, Steve A. Rousseau, Joyce Low, Donald E. Willey, Barbara M. McGeer, Allison Weese, J. Scott Emerg Infect Dis Research Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was isolated from nares of 27/417 (6.5%) attendees at an international veterinary conference: 23/345 (7.0%) veterinarians, 4/34 (12.0%) technicians, and 0/38 others. Colonization was more common for large-animal (15/96, 15.6%) than small-animal personnel (12/271, 4.4%) or those with no animal patient contact (0/50) (p<0.001). Large-animal practice was the only variable significantly associated with colonization (odds ratio 2.9; 95% confidence interval 1.2–6.6). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis identified 2 predominant clones with similar distribution among veterinarians as previously reported for horses and companion animals. Canadian epidemic MRSA-2 (CMRSA) was isolated from 11 small-animal and 2 large-animal personnel from the United States (n = 12) and Germany (n = 1). In contrast, CMRSA-5 was isolated exclusively from large-animal personnel (p<0.001) in the United States (n = 10), United Kingdom (n = 2), and Denmark (n = 1). MRSA colonization may be an occupational risk for veterinary professionals. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3291342/ /pubmed/17326947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1212.060231 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Hanselman, Beth A. Kruth, Steve A. Rousseau, Joyce Low, Donald E. Willey, Barbara M. McGeer, Allison Weese, J. Scott Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel |
title | Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel |
title_full | Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel |
title_fullStr | Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel |
title_full_unstemmed | Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel |
title_short | Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel |
title_sort | methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus colonization in veterinary personnel |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17326947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1212.060231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanselmanbetha methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel AT kruthstevea methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel AT rousseaujoyce methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel AT lowdonalde methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel AT willeybarbaram methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel AT mcgeerallison methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel AT weesejscott methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationinveterinarypersonnel |