Cargando…
Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study
Objective To determine whether detection of invasive cervical cancer by screening results in better prognosis or merely increases the lead time until death. Design Nationwide population based cohort study. Setting Sweden. Participants All 1230 women with cervical cancer diagnosed during 1999-2001 in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22381677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e900 |
_version_ | 1782225176432214016 |
---|---|
author | Andrae, Bengt Andersson, Therese M-L Lambert, Paul C Kemetli, Levent Silfverdal, Lena Strander, Björn Ryd, Walter Dillner, Joakim Törnberg, Sven Sparén, Pär |
author_facet | Andrae, Bengt Andersson, Therese M-L Lambert, Paul C Kemetli, Levent Silfverdal, Lena Strander, Björn Ryd, Walter Dillner, Joakim Törnberg, Sven Sparén, Pär |
author_sort | Andrae, Bengt |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To determine whether detection of invasive cervical cancer by screening results in better prognosis or merely increases the lead time until death. Design Nationwide population based cohort study. Setting Sweden. Participants All 1230 women with cervical cancer diagnosed during 1999-2001 in Sweden prospectively followed up for an average of 8.5 years. Main outcome measures Cure proportions and five year relative survival ratios, stratified by screening history, mode of detection, age, histopathological type, and FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage. Results In the screening ages, the cure proportion for women with screen detected invasive cancer was 92% (95% confidence interval 75% to 98%) and for symptomatic women was 66% (62% to 70%), a statistically significant difference in cure of 26% (16% to 36%). Among symptomatic women, the cure proportion was significantly higher for those who had been screened according to recommendations (interval cancers) than among those overdue for screening: difference in cure 14% (95% confidence interval 6% to 23%). Cure proportions were similar for all histopathological types except small cell carcinomas and were closely related to FIGO stage. A significantly higher cure proportion for screen detected cancers remained after adjustment for stage at diagnosis (difference 15%, 7% to 22%). Conclusions Screening is associated with improved cure of cervical cancer. Confounding cannot be ruled out, but the effect was not attributable to lead time bias and was larger than what is reflected by down-staging. Evaluations of screening programmes should consider the assessment of cure proportions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3291751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32917512012-03-08 Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study Andrae, Bengt Andersson, Therese M-L Lambert, Paul C Kemetli, Levent Silfverdal, Lena Strander, Björn Ryd, Walter Dillner, Joakim Törnberg, Sven Sparén, Pär BMJ Research Objective To determine whether detection of invasive cervical cancer by screening results in better prognosis or merely increases the lead time until death. Design Nationwide population based cohort study. Setting Sweden. Participants All 1230 women with cervical cancer diagnosed during 1999-2001 in Sweden prospectively followed up for an average of 8.5 years. Main outcome measures Cure proportions and five year relative survival ratios, stratified by screening history, mode of detection, age, histopathological type, and FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage. Results In the screening ages, the cure proportion for women with screen detected invasive cancer was 92% (95% confidence interval 75% to 98%) and for symptomatic women was 66% (62% to 70%), a statistically significant difference in cure of 26% (16% to 36%). Among symptomatic women, the cure proportion was significantly higher for those who had been screened according to recommendations (interval cancers) than among those overdue for screening: difference in cure 14% (95% confidence interval 6% to 23%). Cure proportions were similar for all histopathological types except small cell carcinomas and were closely related to FIGO stage. A significantly higher cure proportion for screen detected cancers remained after adjustment for stage at diagnosis (difference 15%, 7% to 22%). Conclusions Screening is associated with improved cure of cervical cancer. Confounding cannot be ruled out, but the effect was not attributable to lead time bias and was larger than what is reflected by down-staging. Evaluations of screening programmes should consider the assessment of cure proportions. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3291751/ /pubmed/22381677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e900 Text en © Andrae et al 2012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Research Andrae, Bengt Andersson, Therese M-L Lambert, Paul C Kemetli, Levent Silfverdal, Lena Strander, Björn Ryd, Walter Dillner, Joakim Törnberg, Sven Sparén, Pär Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study |
title | Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study |
title_full | Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study |
title_fullStr | Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study |
title_short | Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study |
title_sort | screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22381677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e900 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andraebengt screeningandcervicalcancercurepopulationbasedcohortstudy AT anderssonthereseml screeningandcervicalcancercurepopulationbasedcohortstudy AT lambertpaulc screeningandcervicalcancercurepopulationbasedcohortstudy AT kemetlilevent screeningandcervicalcancercurepopulationbasedcohortstudy AT silfverdallena screeningandcervicalcancercurepopulationbasedcohortstudy AT stranderbjorn screeningandcervicalcancercurepopulationbasedcohortstudy AT rydwalter screeningandcervicalcancercurepopulationbasedcohortstudy AT dillnerjoakim screeningandcervicalcancercurepopulationbasedcohortstudy AT tornbergsven screeningandcervicalcancercurepopulationbasedcohortstudy AT sparenpar screeningandcervicalcancercurepopulationbasedcohortstudy |