Cargando…

Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture

Biocides are chemical substances that can deter or kill the microorganisms responsible for biofouling. The rapid expansion of the aquaculture industry is having a significant impact on the marine ecosystems. As the industry expands, it requires the use of more drugs, disinfectants and antifoulant co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guardiola, Francisco Antonio, Cuesta, Alberto, Meseguer, José, Esteban, Maria Angeles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22408407
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms13021541
_version_ 1782225208932827136
author Guardiola, Francisco Antonio
Cuesta, Alberto
Meseguer, José
Esteban, Maria Angeles
author_facet Guardiola, Francisco Antonio
Cuesta, Alberto
Meseguer, José
Esteban, Maria Angeles
author_sort Guardiola, Francisco Antonio
collection PubMed
description Biocides are chemical substances that can deter or kill the microorganisms responsible for biofouling. The rapid expansion of the aquaculture industry is having a significant impact on the marine ecosystems. As the industry expands, it requires the use of more drugs, disinfectants and antifoulant compounds (biocides) to eliminate the microorganisms in the aquaculture facilities. The use of biocides in the aquatic environment, however, has proved to be harmful as it has toxic effects on the marine environment. Organic booster biocides were recently introduced as alternatives to the organotin compounds found in antifouling products after restrictions were imposed on the use of tributyltin (TBT). The replacement products are generally based on copper metal oxides and organic biocides. The biocides that are most commonly used in antifouling paints include chlorothalonil, dichlofluanid, DCOIT (4,5-dichloro-2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, Sea-nine 211(®)), Diuron, Irgarol 1051, TCMS pyridine (2,3,3,6-tetrachloro-4-methylsulfonyl pyridine), zinc pyrithione and Zineb. There are two types of risks associated with the use of biocides in aquaculture: (i) predators and humans may ingest the fish and shellfish that have accumulated in these contaminants and (ii) the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. This paper provides an overview of the effects of antifouling (AF) biocides on aquatic organisms. It also provides some insights into the effects and risks of these compounds on non-target organisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3291976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32919762012-03-09 Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture Guardiola, Francisco Antonio Cuesta, Alberto Meseguer, José Esteban, Maria Angeles Int J Mol Sci Review Biocides are chemical substances that can deter or kill the microorganisms responsible for biofouling. The rapid expansion of the aquaculture industry is having a significant impact on the marine ecosystems. As the industry expands, it requires the use of more drugs, disinfectants and antifoulant compounds (biocides) to eliminate the microorganisms in the aquaculture facilities. The use of biocides in the aquatic environment, however, has proved to be harmful as it has toxic effects on the marine environment. Organic booster biocides were recently introduced as alternatives to the organotin compounds found in antifouling products after restrictions were imposed on the use of tributyltin (TBT). The replacement products are generally based on copper metal oxides and organic biocides. The biocides that are most commonly used in antifouling paints include chlorothalonil, dichlofluanid, DCOIT (4,5-dichloro-2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, Sea-nine 211(®)), Diuron, Irgarol 1051, TCMS pyridine (2,3,3,6-tetrachloro-4-methylsulfonyl pyridine), zinc pyrithione and Zineb. There are two types of risks associated with the use of biocides in aquaculture: (i) predators and humans may ingest the fish and shellfish that have accumulated in these contaminants and (ii) the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. This paper provides an overview of the effects of antifouling (AF) biocides on aquatic organisms. It also provides some insights into the effects and risks of these compounds on non-target organisms. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3291976/ /pubmed/22408407 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms13021541 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Guardiola, Francisco Antonio
Cuesta, Alberto
Meseguer, José
Esteban, Maria Angeles
Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture
title Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture
title_full Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture
title_fullStr Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture
title_full_unstemmed Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture
title_short Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture
title_sort risks of using antifouling biocides in aquaculture
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22408407
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms13021541
work_keys_str_mv AT guardiolafranciscoantonio risksofusingantifoulingbiocidesinaquaculture
AT cuestaalberto risksofusingantifoulingbiocidesinaquaculture
AT meseguerjose risksofusingantifoulingbiocidesinaquaculture
AT estebanmariaangeles risksofusingantifoulingbiocidesinaquaculture