Cargando…

Scoliosis short-term rehabilitation (SSTR) according to 'Best Practice' standards - are the results repeatable?

Claims have been made in a pilot study that a new form of short-term rehabilitation according to 'Best Practice' standards would change signs and symptoms of patients with scoliosis in the short-term. Aim of this study is to repeat the study published 2010 with a larger sample of patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borysov, Maksym, Borysov, Artem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3292465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22251672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-7-1
_version_ 1782225277295788032
author Borysov, Maksym
Borysov, Artem
author_facet Borysov, Maksym
Borysov, Artem
author_sort Borysov, Maksym
collection PubMed
description Claims have been made in a pilot study that a new form of short-term rehabilitation according to 'Best Practice' standards would change signs and symptoms of patients with scoliosis in the short-term. Aim of this study is to repeat the study published 2010 with a larger sample of patients using the same protocol. Both authors have undergone training in this special approach to scoliosis rehabilitation in 2010. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 34 patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), 32 girls and 2 boys, average age 13.7 years and an average Cobb angle of 28.7 degrees (21-43 degrees) underwent Scoliosis Short-Term Rehabilitation (SSTR) of seven days. Two days with an intensity of 3 × 90 min sessions/day, and five days with an intensity of 2 × 60 min sessions/day. Angle of trunk rotation (ATR) was measured before and after the time of treatment as well as the active correctability of the ATR after the programme as it has been done in the pilot investigation. Additionally to that, we also recorded the changes in Vital Capacity (VC) before and after the programme. RESULTS: ATR was reduced significantly from 11,5 degrees to 8,4 degrees, the active correctability as measured with the Scoliometer (TM) was also reduced significantly from the ATR after treatment 8,9 degrees to 6,5 degrees in the patients with thoracic curves. VC improved significantly (P < 0,05) from 2073 ml to 2326 ml. DISCUSSION: The results achieved in the pilot investigation published previously are repeatable. The deformity of the trunk can be reduced significantly after SSTR. During the pilot study VC was not investigated. In our study VC improved significantly. Therefore, also shorter rehabilitation times with an appropriate programme seem to be able to change signs and symptoms of a patient with scoliosis. Like the out-patient Schroth programme as described in a study from Turkey, the SSTR provides benefits leading to an improvement of the condition. CONCLUSION: Out-patient rehabilitation following the Scoliologic (TM) 'Best Practice' standards seems to provide an improvement of signs and symptoms of scoliosis patients in this study using a pre-/post prospective design. The results of the pilot study therefore seem to be repeatable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3292465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32924652012-03-03 Scoliosis short-term rehabilitation (SSTR) according to 'Best Practice' standards - are the results repeatable? Borysov, Maksym Borysov, Artem Scoliosis Methodology Claims have been made in a pilot study that a new form of short-term rehabilitation according to 'Best Practice' standards would change signs and symptoms of patients with scoliosis in the short-term. Aim of this study is to repeat the study published 2010 with a larger sample of patients using the same protocol. Both authors have undergone training in this special approach to scoliosis rehabilitation in 2010. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 34 patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), 32 girls and 2 boys, average age 13.7 years and an average Cobb angle of 28.7 degrees (21-43 degrees) underwent Scoliosis Short-Term Rehabilitation (SSTR) of seven days. Two days with an intensity of 3 × 90 min sessions/day, and five days with an intensity of 2 × 60 min sessions/day. Angle of trunk rotation (ATR) was measured before and after the time of treatment as well as the active correctability of the ATR after the programme as it has been done in the pilot investigation. Additionally to that, we also recorded the changes in Vital Capacity (VC) before and after the programme. RESULTS: ATR was reduced significantly from 11,5 degrees to 8,4 degrees, the active correctability as measured with the Scoliometer (TM) was also reduced significantly from the ATR after treatment 8,9 degrees to 6,5 degrees in the patients with thoracic curves. VC improved significantly (P < 0,05) from 2073 ml to 2326 ml. DISCUSSION: The results achieved in the pilot investigation published previously are repeatable. The deformity of the trunk can be reduced significantly after SSTR. During the pilot study VC was not investigated. In our study VC improved significantly. Therefore, also shorter rehabilitation times with an appropriate programme seem to be able to change signs and symptoms of a patient with scoliosis. Like the out-patient Schroth programme as described in a study from Turkey, the SSTR provides benefits leading to an improvement of the condition. CONCLUSION: Out-patient rehabilitation following the Scoliologic (TM) 'Best Practice' standards seems to provide an improvement of signs and symptoms of scoliosis patients in this study using a pre-/post prospective design. The results of the pilot study therefore seem to be repeatable. BioMed Central 2012-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3292465/ /pubmed/22251672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-7-1 Text en Copyright ©2012 Borysov and Borysov; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Borysov, Maksym
Borysov, Artem
Scoliosis short-term rehabilitation (SSTR) according to 'Best Practice' standards - are the results repeatable?
title Scoliosis short-term rehabilitation (SSTR) according to 'Best Practice' standards - are the results repeatable?
title_full Scoliosis short-term rehabilitation (SSTR) according to 'Best Practice' standards - are the results repeatable?
title_fullStr Scoliosis short-term rehabilitation (SSTR) according to 'Best Practice' standards - are the results repeatable?
title_full_unstemmed Scoliosis short-term rehabilitation (SSTR) according to 'Best Practice' standards - are the results repeatable?
title_short Scoliosis short-term rehabilitation (SSTR) according to 'Best Practice' standards - are the results repeatable?
title_sort scoliosis short-term rehabilitation (sstr) according to 'best practice' standards - are the results repeatable?
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3292465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22251672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-7-1
work_keys_str_mv AT borysovmaksym scoliosisshorttermrehabilitationsstraccordingtobestpracticestandardsaretheresultsrepeatable
AT borysovartem scoliosisshorttermrehabilitationsstraccordingtobestpracticestandardsaretheresultsrepeatable