Cargando…

The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species

BACKGROUND: Based on the testing of several loci, predominantly against floristic backgrounds, individual or different combinations of loci have been suggested as possible universal DNA barcodes for plants. The present investigation was undertaken to check the applicability of the recommended locus/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Hemant Kumar, Parveen, Iffat, Raghuvanshi, Saurabh, Babbar, Shashi B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3292824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22260646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-42
_version_ 1782225316312252416
author Singh, Hemant Kumar
Parveen, Iffat
Raghuvanshi, Saurabh
Babbar, Shashi B
author_facet Singh, Hemant Kumar
Parveen, Iffat
Raghuvanshi, Saurabh
Babbar, Shashi B
author_sort Singh, Hemant Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Based on the testing of several loci, predominantly against floristic backgrounds, individual or different combinations of loci have been suggested as possible universal DNA barcodes for plants. The present investigation was undertaken to check the applicability of the recommended locus/loci for congeneric species with Dendrobium species as an illustrative example. RESULTS: Six loci, matK, rbcL, rpoB, rpoC1, trnH-psbA spacer from the chloroplast genome and ITS, from the nuclear genome, were compared for their amplification, sequencing and species discrimination success rates among multiple accessions of 36 Dendrobium species. The trnH-psbA spacer could not be considered for analysis as good quality sequences were not obtained with its forward primer. Among the tested loci, ITS, recommended by some as a possible barcode for plants, provided 100% species identification. Another locus, matK, also recommended as a universal barcode for plants, resolved 80.56% species. ITS remained the best even when sequences of investigated loci of additional Dendrobium species available on the NCBI GenBank (93, 33, 20, 18 and 17 of ITS, matK, rbcL, rpoB and rpoC1, respectively) were also considered for calculating the percent species resolution capabilities. The species discrimination of various combinations of the loci was also compared based on the 36 investigated species and additional 16 for which sequences of all the five loci were available on GenBank. Two-locus combination of matK+rbcL recommended by the Plant Working Group of Consortium for Barcoding of Life (CBOL) could discriminate 86.11% of 36 species. The species discriminating ability of this barcode was reduced to 80.77% when additional sequences available on NCBI were included in the analysis. Among the recommended combinations, the barcode based on three loci - matK, rpoB and rpoC1- resolved maximum number of species. CONCLUSIONS: Any recommended barcode based on the loci tested so far, is not likely to provide 100% species identification across the plant kingdom and thus is not likely to act as a universal barcode. It appears that barcodes, if based on single or limited locus(i), would be taxa specific as is exemplified by the success of ITS among Dendrobium species, though it may not be suitable for other plants because of the problems that are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3292824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32928242012-03-04 The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species Singh, Hemant Kumar Parveen, Iffat Raghuvanshi, Saurabh Babbar, Shashi B BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Based on the testing of several loci, predominantly against floristic backgrounds, individual or different combinations of loci have been suggested as possible universal DNA barcodes for plants. The present investigation was undertaken to check the applicability of the recommended locus/loci for congeneric species with Dendrobium species as an illustrative example. RESULTS: Six loci, matK, rbcL, rpoB, rpoC1, trnH-psbA spacer from the chloroplast genome and ITS, from the nuclear genome, were compared for their amplification, sequencing and species discrimination success rates among multiple accessions of 36 Dendrobium species. The trnH-psbA spacer could not be considered for analysis as good quality sequences were not obtained with its forward primer. Among the tested loci, ITS, recommended by some as a possible barcode for plants, provided 100% species identification. Another locus, matK, also recommended as a universal barcode for plants, resolved 80.56% species. ITS remained the best even when sequences of investigated loci of additional Dendrobium species available on the NCBI GenBank (93, 33, 20, 18 and 17 of ITS, matK, rbcL, rpoB and rpoC1, respectively) were also considered for calculating the percent species resolution capabilities. The species discrimination of various combinations of the loci was also compared based on the 36 investigated species and additional 16 for which sequences of all the five loci were available on GenBank. Two-locus combination of matK+rbcL recommended by the Plant Working Group of Consortium for Barcoding of Life (CBOL) could discriminate 86.11% of 36 species. The species discriminating ability of this barcode was reduced to 80.77% when additional sequences available on NCBI were included in the analysis. Among the recommended combinations, the barcode based on three loci - matK, rpoB and rpoC1- resolved maximum number of species. CONCLUSIONS: Any recommended barcode based on the loci tested so far, is not likely to provide 100% species identification across the plant kingdom and thus is not likely to act as a universal barcode. It appears that barcodes, if based on single or limited locus(i), would be taxa specific as is exemplified by the success of ITS among Dendrobium species, though it may not be suitable for other plants because of the problems that are discussed. BioMed Central 2012-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3292824/ /pubmed/22260646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-42 Text en Copyright ©2012 Singh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Singh, Hemant Kumar
Parveen, Iffat
Raghuvanshi, Saurabh
Babbar, Shashi B
The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species
title The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species
title_full The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species
title_fullStr The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species
title_full_unstemmed The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species
title_short The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species
title_sort loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by dna barcoding of dendrobium species
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3292824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22260646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-42
work_keys_str_mv AT singhhemantkumar thelocirecommendedasuniversalbarcodesforplantsonthebasisoffloristicstudiesmaynotworkwithcongenericspeciesasexemplifiedbydnabarcodingofdendrobiumspecies
AT parveeniffat thelocirecommendedasuniversalbarcodesforplantsonthebasisoffloristicstudiesmaynotworkwithcongenericspeciesasexemplifiedbydnabarcodingofdendrobiumspecies
AT raghuvanshisaurabh thelocirecommendedasuniversalbarcodesforplantsonthebasisoffloristicstudiesmaynotworkwithcongenericspeciesasexemplifiedbydnabarcodingofdendrobiumspecies
AT babbarshashib thelocirecommendedasuniversalbarcodesforplantsonthebasisoffloristicstudiesmaynotworkwithcongenericspeciesasexemplifiedbydnabarcodingofdendrobiumspecies
AT singhhemantkumar locirecommendedasuniversalbarcodesforplantsonthebasisoffloristicstudiesmaynotworkwithcongenericspeciesasexemplifiedbydnabarcodingofdendrobiumspecies
AT parveeniffat locirecommendedasuniversalbarcodesforplantsonthebasisoffloristicstudiesmaynotworkwithcongenericspeciesasexemplifiedbydnabarcodingofdendrobiumspecies
AT raghuvanshisaurabh locirecommendedasuniversalbarcodesforplantsonthebasisoffloristicstudiesmaynotworkwithcongenericspeciesasexemplifiedbydnabarcodingofdendrobiumspecies
AT babbarshashib locirecommendedasuniversalbarcodesforplantsonthebasisoffloristicstudiesmaynotworkwithcongenericspeciesasexemplifiedbydnabarcodingofdendrobiumspecies