Cargando…

Mandibular distraction in neonates: indications, technique, results

BACKGROUND: The Pierre Robin Sequence features were first described by Robin in 1923 and include micrognathia, glossoptosis and respiratory distress with an incidence estimated as 1:8,500 to 1:20,000 newborns. Upper airway obstruction and feeding difficulties are the main concerns related to the pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sesenna, Enrico, Magri, Alice S, Magnani, Cinzia, Brevi, Bruno C, Anghinoni, Marilena L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22300418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-38-7
_version_ 1782225353241001984
author Sesenna, Enrico
Magri, Alice S
Magnani, Cinzia
Brevi, Bruno C
Anghinoni, Marilena L
author_facet Sesenna, Enrico
Magri, Alice S
Magnani, Cinzia
Brevi, Bruno C
Anghinoni, Marilena L
author_sort Sesenna, Enrico
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Pierre Robin Sequence features were first described by Robin in 1923 and include micrognathia, glossoptosis and respiratory distress with an incidence estimated as 1:8,500 to 1:20,000 newborns. Upper airway obstruction and feeding difficulties are the main concerns related to the pathology. Mandibular distraction should be considered a treatment option (when other treatments result inadequate). PATIANTS AND METHODS: Ten patients between the ages of 1 month and 2 years with severe micrognathia and airway obstruction were treated with Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis (MDO). All patients underwent fibroscopic examination of the upper airway and a radiographic imaging and/or computed tomography scans to detect malformations and to confirm that the obstruction was caused by posterior tongue displacement. All patients were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. Indications for surgery included frequent apneic episodes with severe desaturation (70%). Gavage therapy was employed in all patients since oral feeding was not possible. The two tracheotomy patients were 5 months and 2 years old respectively, and the distraction procedure was performed to remove the tracheotomy tube. All patients were treated with bilateral mandibular distraction: two cases with an external multivector distraction device, six cases with an internal non-resorbable device and two cases with an internal resorbable device. In one case, the patient with Goldenhar's Syndrome, the procedure was repeated. RESULTS: The resolution of symptoms was obtained in all patients, and, when present, tracheotomy was removed without complications. Of the two patients with pre-existing tracheotomies, in the younger patient (5 months old) the tracheotomy was removed 7 days postoperatively. In the Goldenhar's syndrome case (2 years old) a Montgomery device was necessary for 6 months due to the presence of tracheotomy-inducted tracheomalacia. Patients were discharged when the endpoint was obtained: symptoms and signs of airway obstruction were resolved, PAS and maxillomandibular relationship improved, and tracheotomy, when present, removed. During the follow-up, no injury to the inferior alveolar nerve was noted and scarring was significant in only the two cases treated with external devices. CONCLUSION: Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis is a good solution in solving respiratory distress when other procedures are failed in paediatric patients with severe micrognatia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3293018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32930182012-03-05 Mandibular distraction in neonates: indications, technique, results Sesenna, Enrico Magri, Alice S Magnani, Cinzia Brevi, Bruno C Anghinoni, Marilena L Ital J Pediatr Review BACKGROUND: The Pierre Robin Sequence features were first described by Robin in 1923 and include micrognathia, glossoptosis and respiratory distress with an incidence estimated as 1:8,500 to 1:20,000 newborns. Upper airway obstruction and feeding difficulties are the main concerns related to the pathology. Mandibular distraction should be considered a treatment option (when other treatments result inadequate). PATIANTS AND METHODS: Ten patients between the ages of 1 month and 2 years with severe micrognathia and airway obstruction were treated with Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis (MDO). All patients underwent fibroscopic examination of the upper airway and a radiographic imaging and/or computed tomography scans to detect malformations and to confirm that the obstruction was caused by posterior tongue displacement. All patients were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. Indications for surgery included frequent apneic episodes with severe desaturation (70%). Gavage therapy was employed in all patients since oral feeding was not possible. The two tracheotomy patients were 5 months and 2 years old respectively, and the distraction procedure was performed to remove the tracheotomy tube. All patients were treated with bilateral mandibular distraction: two cases with an external multivector distraction device, six cases with an internal non-resorbable device and two cases with an internal resorbable device. In one case, the patient with Goldenhar's Syndrome, the procedure was repeated. RESULTS: The resolution of symptoms was obtained in all patients, and, when present, tracheotomy was removed without complications. Of the two patients with pre-existing tracheotomies, in the younger patient (5 months old) the tracheotomy was removed 7 days postoperatively. In the Goldenhar's syndrome case (2 years old) a Montgomery device was necessary for 6 months due to the presence of tracheotomy-inducted tracheomalacia. Patients were discharged when the endpoint was obtained: symptoms and signs of airway obstruction were resolved, PAS and maxillomandibular relationship improved, and tracheotomy, when present, removed. During the follow-up, no injury to the inferior alveolar nerve was noted and scarring was significant in only the two cases treated with external devices. CONCLUSION: Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis is a good solution in solving respiratory distress when other procedures are failed in paediatric patients with severe micrognatia. BioMed Central 2012-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3293018/ /pubmed/22300418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-38-7 Text en Copyright ©2012 Sesenna et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Sesenna, Enrico
Magri, Alice S
Magnani, Cinzia
Brevi, Bruno C
Anghinoni, Marilena L
Mandibular distraction in neonates: indications, technique, results
title Mandibular distraction in neonates: indications, technique, results
title_full Mandibular distraction in neonates: indications, technique, results
title_fullStr Mandibular distraction in neonates: indications, technique, results
title_full_unstemmed Mandibular distraction in neonates: indications, technique, results
title_short Mandibular distraction in neonates: indications, technique, results
title_sort mandibular distraction in neonates: indications, technique, results
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22300418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-38-7
work_keys_str_mv AT sesennaenrico mandibulardistractioninneonatesindicationstechniqueresults
AT magrialices mandibulardistractioninneonatesindicationstechniqueresults
AT magnanicinzia mandibulardistractioninneonatesindicationstechniqueresults
AT brevibrunoc mandibulardistractioninneonatesindicationstechniqueresults
AT anghinonimarilenal mandibulardistractioninneonatesindicationstechniqueresults