Cargando…

Narrow safety range of intraoperative rectal irradiation exposure volume for avoiding bleeding after seed implant brachytherapy

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Rectal toxicity is less common after (125)I seed implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer, and intraoperative rectal dose-volume constraints (the constraint) is still undetermined in pioneering studies. As our constraint failed to prevent grade 2 or 3 rectal bleeding (bled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Ryuji, Kikuchi, Koyo, Tanji, Susumu, Yabuuchi, Tomonori, Uwano, Ikuko, Yamaguchi, Satoshi, Ariga, Hisanori, Fujioka, Tomoaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22293400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-15
_version_ 1782225359319597056
author Nakamura, Ryuji
Kikuchi, Koyo
Tanji, Susumu
Yabuuchi, Tomonori
Uwano, Ikuko
Yamaguchi, Satoshi
Ariga, Hisanori
Fujioka, Tomoaki
author_facet Nakamura, Ryuji
Kikuchi, Koyo
Tanji, Susumu
Yabuuchi, Tomonori
Uwano, Ikuko
Yamaguchi, Satoshi
Ariga, Hisanori
Fujioka, Tomoaki
author_sort Nakamura, Ryuji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Rectal toxicity is less common after (125)I seed implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer, and intraoperative rectal dose-volume constraints (the constraint) is still undetermined in pioneering studies. As our constraint failed to prevent grade 2 or 3 rectal bleeding (bled-pts) in 5.1% of patients, we retrospectively explored another constraint for the prevention of rectal bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 197 patients treated with the brachytherapy as monotherapy using real-time intraoperative transrectal ultrasound (US)-guided treatment at a prescribed dose of 145 Gy. Post-implant dosimetry was performed on Day 1 and Day 30 after implantation using computed tomography (CT) imaging. Rectal bleeding toxicity was classified by CTC-AE ver. 3.0 during a mean 29-month (range, 12-48 months) period after implantation. The differences in rV100s were compared among intraoperative, Day 1 and Day 30 dosimetry, and between that of patients with grade 2 or 3 rectal bleeding (the bled-pts) and of the others (the spared-pts). All patients were divided into groups based on provisional rV100s that were increased stepwise in 0.1-cc increments from 0 to 1.0 cc. The difference in the ratios of the bled-pts to the spared-pts was tested by chi-square tests, and their odds ratios were calculated (bled-OR). All statistical analyses were performed by t-tests. RESULTS: The mean values of rV100us, rV100CT_1, and rV100CT_30 were 0.31 ± 0.43, 0.22 ± 0.36, and 0.59 ± 0.68 cc, respectively. These values temporarily decreased (p = 0.020) on Day 1 and increased (p = 0.000) on Day 30. There was no significant difference in rV100s between the bled-pts and spared-pts at any time of dosimetry. The maximum bled-OR was identified among patients with an rV100us value above 0.1 cc (p = 0.025; OR = 7.8; 95% CI, 1.4-145.8); an rV100CT_1 value above 0.3 cc (p = 0.014; OR = 16.2; 95% CI, 3.9-110.7), and an rV100CT_30 value above 0.5 cc (p = 0.019; OR = 6.3; 95% CI, 1.5-42.3). CONCLUSION: By retrospective analysis exploring rV100 as intraoperative rectal dose-volume thresholds in (125)I seed implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer, it is proved that rV100 should be less than 0.1 cc for preventing rectal bleeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3293044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32930442012-03-05 Narrow safety range of intraoperative rectal irradiation exposure volume for avoiding bleeding after seed implant brachytherapy Nakamura, Ryuji Kikuchi, Koyo Tanji, Susumu Yabuuchi, Tomonori Uwano, Ikuko Yamaguchi, Satoshi Ariga, Hisanori Fujioka, Tomoaki Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Rectal toxicity is less common after (125)I seed implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer, and intraoperative rectal dose-volume constraints (the constraint) is still undetermined in pioneering studies. As our constraint failed to prevent grade 2 or 3 rectal bleeding (bled-pts) in 5.1% of patients, we retrospectively explored another constraint for the prevention of rectal bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 197 patients treated with the brachytherapy as monotherapy using real-time intraoperative transrectal ultrasound (US)-guided treatment at a prescribed dose of 145 Gy. Post-implant dosimetry was performed on Day 1 and Day 30 after implantation using computed tomography (CT) imaging. Rectal bleeding toxicity was classified by CTC-AE ver. 3.0 during a mean 29-month (range, 12-48 months) period after implantation. The differences in rV100s were compared among intraoperative, Day 1 and Day 30 dosimetry, and between that of patients with grade 2 or 3 rectal bleeding (the bled-pts) and of the others (the spared-pts). All patients were divided into groups based on provisional rV100s that were increased stepwise in 0.1-cc increments from 0 to 1.0 cc. The difference in the ratios of the bled-pts to the spared-pts was tested by chi-square tests, and their odds ratios were calculated (bled-OR). All statistical analyses were performed by t-tests. RESULTS: The mean values of rV100us, rV100CT_1, and rV100CT_30 were 0.31 ± 0.43, 0.22 ± 0.36, and 0.59 ± 0.68 cc, respectively. These values temporarily decreased (p = 0.020) on Day 1 and increased (p = 0.000) on Day 30. There was no significant difference in rV100s between the bled-pts and spared-pts at any time of dosimetry. The maximum bled-OR was identified among patients with an rV100us value above 0.1 cc (p = 0.025; OR = 7.8; 95% CI, 1.4-145.8); an rV100CT_1 value above 0.3 cc (p = 0.014; OR = 16.2; 95% CI, 3.9-110.7), and an rV100CT_30 value above 0.5 cc (p = 0.019; OR = 6.3; 95% CI, 1.5-42.3). CONCLUSION: By retrospective analysis exploring rV100 as intraoperative rectal dose-volume thresholds in (125)I seed implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer, it is proved that rV100 should be less than 0.1 cc for preventing rectal bleeding. BioMed Central 2012-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3293044/ /pubmed/22293400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-15 Text en Copyright ©2012 Nakamura et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Nakamura, Ryuji
Kikuchi, Koyo
Tanji, Susumu
Yabuuchi, Tomonori
Uwano, Ikuko
Yamaguchi, Satoshi
Ariga, Hisanori
Fujioka, Tomoaki
Narrow safety range of intraoperative rectal irradiation exposure volume for avoiding bleeding after seed implant brachytherapy
title Narrow safety range of intraoperative rectal irradiation exposure volume for avoiding bleeding after seed implant brachytherapy
title_full Narrow safety range of intraoperative rectal irradiation exposure volume for avoiding bleeding after seed implant brachytherapy
title_fullStr Narrow safety range of intraoperative rectal irradiation exposure volume for avoiding bleeding after seed implant brachytherapy
title_full_unstemmed Narrow safety range of intraoperative rectal irradiation exposure volume for avoiding bleeding after seed implant brachytherapy
title_short Narrow safety range of intraoperative rectal irradiation exposure volume for avoiding bleeding after seed implant brachytherapy
title_sort narrow safety range of intraoperative rectal irradiation exposure volume for avoiding bleeding after seed implant brachytherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22293400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-15
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamuraryuji narrowsafetyrangeofintraoperativerectalirradiationexposurevolumeforavoidingbleedingafterseedimplantbrachytherapy
AT kikuchikoyo narrowsafetyrangeofintraoperativerectalirradiationexposurevolumeforavoidingbleedingafterseedimplantbrachytherapy
AT tanjisusumu narrowsafetyrangeofintraoperativerectalirradiationexposurevolumeforavoidingbleedingafterseedimplantbrachytherapy
AT yabuuchitomonori narrowsafetyrangeofintraoperativerectalirradiationexposurevolumeforavoidingbleedingafterseedimplantbrachytherapy
AT uwanoikuko narrowsafetyrangeofintraoperativerectalirradiationexposurevolumeforavoidingbleedingafterseedimplantbrachytherapy
AT yamaguchisatoshi narrowsafetyrangeofintraoperativerectalirradiationexposurevolumeforavoidingbleedingafterseedimplantbrachytherapy
AT arigahisanori narrowsafetyrangeofintraoperativerectalirradiationexposurevolumeforavoidingbleedingafterseedimplantbrachytherapy
AT fujiokatomoaki narrowsafetyrangeofintraoperativerectalirradiationexposurevolumeforavoidingbleedingafterseedimplantbrachytherapy