Cargando…

Aligning vertical interventions to health systems: a case study of the HIV monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa

BACKGROUND: Like many low- and middle-income countries, South Africa established a dedicated HIV monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system to track the national response to HIV/AIDS. Its implementation in the public health sector has however not been assessed. Since responsibility for health servic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawonga, Mary, Blaauw, Duane, Fonn, Sharon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22280794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-2
_version_ 1782225365906751488
author Kawonga, Mary
Blaauw, Duane
Fonn, Sharon
author_facet Kawonga, Mary
Blaauw, Duane
Fonn, Sharon
author_sort Kawonga, Mary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Like many low- and middle-income countries, South Africa established a dedicated HIV monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system to track the national response to HIV/AIDS. Its implementation in the public health sector has however not been assessed. Since responsibility for health services management lies at the district (sub-national) level, this study aimed to assess the extent to which the HIV M&E system is integrated with the overall health system M&E function at district level. This study describes implementation of the HIV M&E system, determines the extent to which it is integrated with the district health information system (DHIS), and evaluates factors influencing HIV M&E integration. METHODS: The study was conducted in one health district in South Africa. Data were collected through key informant interviews with programme and health facility managers and review of M&E records at health facilities providing HIV services. Data analysis assessed the extent to which processes for HIV data collection, collation, analysis and reporting were integrated with the DHIS. RESULTS: The HIV M&E system is top-down, over-sized, and captures a significant amount of energy and resources to primarily generate antiretroviral treatment (ART) indicators. Processes for producing HIV prevention indicators are integrated with the DHIS. However processes for the production of HIV treatment indicators by-pass the DHIS and ART indicators are not disseminated to district health managers. Specific reporting requirements linked to ear-marked funding, politically-driven imperatives, and mistrust of DHIS capacity are key drivers of this silo approach. CONCLUSIONS: Parallel systems that bypass the DHIS represent a missed opportunity to strengthen system-wide M&E capacity. Integrating HIV M&E (staff, systems and process) into the health system M&E function would mobilise ear-marked HIV funding towards improving DHIS capacity to produce quality and timely HIV indicators that would benefit both programme and health system M&E functions. This offers a practical way of maximising programme-system synergies and translating the health system strengthening intents of existing HIV policies into tangible action.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3293072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32930722012-03-05 Aligning vertical interventions to health systems: a case study of the HIV monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa Kawonga, Mary Blaauw, Duane Fonn, Sharon Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Like many low- and middle-income countries, South Africa established a dedicated HIV monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system to track the national response to HIV/AIDS. Its implementation in the public health sector has however not been assessed. Since responsibility for health services management lies at the district (sub-national) level, this study aimed to assess the extent to which the HIV M&E system is integrated with the overall health system M&E function at district level. This study describes implementation of the HIV M&E system, determines the extent to which it is integrated with the district health information system (DHIS), and evaluates factors influencing HIV M&E integration. METHODS: The study was conducted in one health district in South Africa. Data were collected through key informant interviews with programme and health facility managers and review of M&E records at health facilities providing HIV services. Data analysis assessed the extent to which processes for HIV data collection, collation, analysis and reporting were integrated with the DHIS. RESULTS: The HIV M&E system is top-down, over-sized, and captures a significant amount of energy and resources to primarily generate antiretroviral treatment (ART) indicators. Processes for producing HIV prevention indicators are integrated with the DHIS. However processes for the production of HIV treatment indicators by-pass the DHIS and ART indicators are not disseminated to district health managers. Specific reporting requirements linked to ear-marked funding, politically-driven imperatives, and mistrust of DHIS capacity are key drivers of this silo approach. CONCLUSIONS: Parallel systems that bypass the DHIS represent a missed opportunity to strengthen system-wide M&E capacity. Integrating HIV M&E (staff, systems and process) into the health system M&E function would mobilise ear-marked HIV funding towards improving DHIS capacity to produce quality and timely HIV indicators that would benefit both programme and health system M&E functions. This offers a practical way of maximising programme-system synergies and translating the health system strengthening intents of existing HIV policies into tangible action. BioMed Central 2012-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3293072/ /pubmed/22280794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-2 Text en Copyright ©2012 Kawonga et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kawonga, Mary
Blaauw, Duane
Fonn, Sharon
Aligning vertical interventions to health systems: a case study of the HIV monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa
title Aligning vertical interventions to health systems: a case study of the HIV monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa
title_full Aligning vertical interventions to health systems: a case study of the HIV monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa
title_fullStr Aligning vertical interventions to health systems: a case study of the HIV monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Aligning vertical interventions to health systems: a case study of the HIV monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa
title_short Aligning vertical interventions to health systems: a case study of the HIV monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa
title_sort aligning vertical interventions to health systems: a case study of the hiv monitoring and evaluation system in south africa
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22280794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kawongamary aligningverticalinterventionstohealthsystemsacasestudyofthehivmonitoringandevaluationsysteminsouthafrica
AT blaauwduane aligningverticalinterventionstohealthsystemsacasestudyofthehivmonitoringandevaluationsysteminsouthafrica
AT fonnsharon aligningverticalinterventionstohealthsystemsacasestudyofthehivmonitoringandevaluationsysteminsouthafrica