Cargando…

The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate current patterns of management and outcomes of intermittent distance exotropia [X(T)] in the UK. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study which recruited 460 children aged < 12 years with previously untreated X(T). Eligible subjects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buck, Deborah, Powell, Christine J, Rahi, Jugnoo, Cumberland, Phillippa, Tiffin, Peter, Taylor, Robert, Sloper, John, Davis, Helen, Dawson, Emma, Clarke, Michael P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22257496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-12-1
_version_ 1782225369276874752
author Buck, Deborah
Powell, Christine J
Rahi, Jugnoo
Cumberland, Phillippa
Tiffin, Peter
Taylor, Robert
Sloper, John
Davis, Helen
Dawson, Emma
Clarke, Michael P
author_facet Buck, Deborah
Powell, Christine J
Rahi, Jugnoo
Cumberland, Phillippa
Tiffin, Peter
Taylor, Robert
Sloper, John
Davis, Helen
Dawson, Emma
Clarke, Michael P
author_sort Buck, Deborah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate current patterns of management and outcomes of intermittent distance exotropia [X(T)] in the UK. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study which recruited 460 children aged < 12 years with previously untreated X(T). Eligible subjects were enrolled from 26 UK hospital ophthalmology clinics between May 2005 and December 2006. Over a 2-year period of follow-up, clinical data were prospectively recorded at standard intervals from enrolment. Data collected included angle, near stereoacuity, visual acuity, control of X(T) measured with the Newcastle Control Score (NCS), and treatment. The main outcome measures were change in clinical outcomes (angle, stereoacuity, visual acuity and NCS) in treated and untreated X(T), 2 years from enrolment (or, where applicable, 6 months after surgery). Change over time was tested using the chi-square test for categorical, Wilcoxon test for non-parametric and paired-samples t-test for parametric data. RESULTS: At follow-up, data were available for 371 children (81% of the original cohort). Of these: 53% (195) had no treatment; 17% (63) had treatment for reduced visual acuity only (pure refractive error and amblyopia); 13% (50) had non surgical treatment for control (spectacle lenses, occlusion, prisms, exercises) and 17% (63) had surgery. Only 0.5% (2/371) children developed constant exotropia. The surgically treated group was the only group with clinically significant improvements in angle or NCS. However, 8% (5) of those treated surgically required second procedures for overcorrection within 6 months of the initial procedure and at 6-month follow-up 21% (13) were overcorrected. CONCLUSIONS: Many children in the UK with X(T) receive active monitoring only. Deterioration to constant exotropia, with or without treatment, is rare. Surgery appears effective in improving angle of X(T) and NCS, but rates of overcorrection are high.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3293086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32930862012-03-05 The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort Buck, Deborah Powell, Christine J Rahi, Jugnoo Cumberland, Phillippa Tiffin, Peter Taylor, Robert Sloper, John Davis, Helen Dawson, Emma Clarke, Michael P BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate current patterns of management and outcomes of intermittent distance exotropia [X(T)] in the UK. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study which recruited 460 children aged < 12 years with previously untreated X(T). Eligible subjects were enrolled from 26 UK hospital ophthalmology clinics between May 2005 and December 2006. Over a 2-year period of follow-up, clinical data were prospectively recorded at standard intervals from enrolment. Data collected included angle, near stereoacuity, visual acuity, control of X(T) measured with the Newcastle Control Score (NCS), and treatment. The main outcome measures were change in clinical outcomes (angle, stereoacuity, visual acuity and NCS) in treated and untreated X(T), 2 years from enrolment (or, where applicable, 6 months after surgery). Change over time was tested using the chi-square test for categorical, Wilcoxon test for non-parametric and paired-samples t-test for parametric data. RESULTS: At follow-up, data were available for 371 children (81% of the original cohort). Of these: 53% (195) had no treatment; 17% (63) had treatment for reduced visual acuity only (pure refractive error and amblyopia); 13% (50) had non surgical treatment for control (spectacle lenses, occlusion, prisms, exercises) and 17% (63) had surgery. Only 0.5% (2/371) children developed constant exotropia. The surgically treated group was the only group with clinically significant improvements in angle or NCS. However, 8% (5) of those treated surgically required second procedures for overcorrection within 6 months of the initial procedure and at 6-month follow-up 21% (13) were overcorrected. CONCLUSIONS: Many children in the UK with X(T) receive active monitoring only. Deterioration to constant exotropia, with or without treatment, is rare. Surgery appears effective in improving angle of X(T) and NCS, but rates of overcorrection are high. BioMed Central 2012-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3293086/ /pubmed/22257496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-12-1 Text en Copyright ©2012 Buck et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Buck, Deborah
Powell, Christine J
Rahi, Jugnoo
Cumberland, Phillippa
Tiffin, Peter
Taylor, Robert
Sloper, John
Davis, Helen
Dawson, Emma
Clarke, Michael P
The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
title The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
title_full The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
title_fullStr The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
title_full_unstemmed The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
title_short The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
title_sort improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22257496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-12-1
work_keys_str_mv AT buckdeborah theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT powellchristinej theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT rahijugnoo theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT cumberlandphillippa theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT tiffinpeter theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT taylorrobert theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT sloperjohn theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT davishelen theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT dawsonemma theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT clarkemichaelp theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT buckdeborah improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT powellchristinej improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT rahijugnoo improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT cumberlandphillippa improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT tiffinpeter improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT taylorrobert improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT sloperjohn improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT davishelen improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT dawsonemma improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT clarkemichaelp improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort