Cargando…

Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: HIV is the most important risk factor for progression of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to active tuberculosis (TB). Detection and treatment of LTBI is necessary to reduce the increasing burden of TB in the UK, but a unified LTBI screening approach has not been adopted. OBJECTIVE:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pollock, Katrina M, Tam, Herman, Grass, Lisa, Bowes, Sharleen, Cooke, Graham S, Pareek, Manish, Montamat-Sicotte, Damien, Kapembwa, Moses, Taylor, Graham P, Lalvani, Ajit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22382123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000762
_version_ 1782225373649436672
author Pollock, Katrina M
Tam, Herman
Grass, Lisa
Bowes, Sharleen
Cooke, Graham S
Pareek, Manish
Montamat-Sicotte, Damien
Kapembwa, Moses
Taylor, Graham P
Lalvani, Ajit
author_facet Pollock, Katrina M
Tam, Herman
Grass, Lisa
Bowes, Sharleen
Cooke, Graham S
Pareek, Manish
Montamat-Sicotte, Damien
Kapembwa, Moses
Taylor, Graham P
Lalvani, Ajit
author_sort Pollock, Katrina M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HIV is the most important risk factor for progression of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to active tuberculosis (TB). Detection and treatment of LTBI is necessary to reduce the increasing burden of TB in the UK, but a unified LTBI screening approach has not been adopted. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a TB risk-focused approach to LTBI screening in the HIV-positive population against current UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two urban HIV treatment centres in London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 114 HIV-infected individuals with defined TB risk factors were enrolled prospectively as part of ongoing studies into HIV and TB co-infection. OUTCOME MEASURES: The yield and case detection rate of LTBI cases within the research study were compared with those generated by the NICE criteria. RESULTS: 17/114 (14.9%, 95% CI 8.3 to 21.5) had evidence of LTBI. Limiting screening to those meeting NICE criteria for the general population (n=43) would have detected just over half of these, 9/43 (20.9%, 95% CI 8.3 to 33.5) and those meeting criteria for HIV co-infection (n=74) would only have captured 8/74(10.8%, 95% CI 3.6 to 18.1) cases. The case detection rates from the study and NICE approaches were not significantly different. LTBI was associated with the presence of multiple TB risk factors (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Adoption of a TB risk-focused screening algorithm that does not use CD4 count stratification could prevent more cases of TB reactivation, without changing the case detection rate. These findings should be used to inform a large-scale study to create unified guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3293130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32931302012-03-08 Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study Pollock, Katrina M Tam, Herman Grass, Lisa Bowes, Sharleen Cooke, Graham S Pareek, Manish Montamat-Sicotte, Damien Kapembwa, Moses Taylor, Graham P Lalvani, Ajit BMJ Open Health Policy BACKGROUND: HIV is the most important risk factor for progression of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to active tuberculosis (TB). Detection and treatment of LTBI is necessary to reduce the increasing burden of TB in the UK, but a unified LTBI screening approach has not been adopted. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a TB risk-focused approach to LTBI screening in the HIV-positive population against current UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two urban HIV treatment centres in London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 114 HIV-infected individuals with defined TB risk factors were enrolled prospectively as part of ongoing studies into HIV and TB co-infection. OUTCOME MEASURES: The yield and case detection rate of LTBI cases within the research study were compared with those generated by the NICE criteria. RESULTS: 17/114 (14.9%, 95% CI 8.3 to 21.5) had evidence of LTBI. Limiting screening to those meeting NICE criteria for the general population (n=43) would have detected just over half of these, 9/43 (20.9%, 95% CI 8.3 to 33.5) and those meeting criteria for HIV co-infection (n=74) would only have captured 8/74(10.8%, 95% CI 3.6 to 18.1) cases. The case detection rates from the study and NICE approaches were not significantly different. LTBI was associated with the presence of multiple TB risk factors (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Adoption of a TB risk-focused screening algorithm that does not use CD4 count stratification could prevent more cases of TB reactivation, without changing the case detection rate. These findings should be used to inform a large-scale study to create unified guidelines. BMJ Group 2012-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3293130/ /pubmed/22382123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000762 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Pollock, Katrina M
Tam, Herman
Grass, Lisa
Bowes, Sharleen
Cooke, Graham S
Pareek, Manish
Montamat-Sicotte, Damien
Kapembwa, Moses
Taylor, Graham P
Lalvani, Ajit
Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study
title Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study
title_full Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study
title_fullStr Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study
title_short Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study
title_sort comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the hiv-positive population: a cohort study
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22382123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000762
work_keys_str_mv AT pollockkatrinam comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy
AT tamherman comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy
AT grasslisa comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy
AT bowessharleen comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy
AT cookegrahams comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy
AT pareekmanish comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy
AT montamatsicottedamien comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy
AT kapembwamoses comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy
AT taylorgrahamp comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy
AT lalvaniajit comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy