Cargando…
Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study
BACKGROUND: HIV is the most important risk factor for progression of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to active tuberculosis (TB). Detection and treatment of LTBI is necessary to reduce the increasing burden of TB in the UK, but a unified LTBI screening approach has not been adopted. OBJECTIVE:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22382123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000762 |
_version_ | 1782225373649436672 |
---|---|
author | Pollock, Katrina M Tam, Herman Grass, Lisa Bowes, Sharleen Cooke, Graham S Pareek, Manish Montamat-Sicotte, Damien Kapembwa, Moses Taylor, Graham P Lalvani, Ajit |
author_facet | Pollock, Katrina M Tam, Herman Grass, Lisa Bowes, Sharleen Cooke, Graham S Pareek, Manish Montamat-Sicotte, Damien Kapembwa, Moses Taylor, Graham P Lalvani, Ajit |
author_sort | Pollock, Katrina M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: HIV is the most important risk factor for progression of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to active tuberculosis (TB). Detection and treatment of LTBI is necessary to reduce the increasing burden of TB in the UK, but a unified LTBI screening approach has not been adopted. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a TB risk-focused approach to LTBI screening in the HIV-positive population against current UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two urban HIV treatment centres in London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 114 HIV-infected individuals with defined TB risk factors were enrolled prospectively as part of ongoing studies into HIV and TB co-infection. OUTCOME MEASURES: The yield and case detection rate of LTBI cases within the research study were compared with those generated by the NICE criteria. RESULTS: 17/114 (14.9%, 95% CI 8.3 to 21.5) had evidence of LTBI. Limiting screening to those meeting NICE criteria for the general population (n=43) would have detected just over half of these, 9/43 (20.9%, 95% CI 8.3 to 33.5) and those meeting criteria for HIV co-infection (n=74) would only have captured 8/74(10.8%, 95% CI 3.6 to 18.1) cases. The case detection rates from the study and NICE approaches were not significantly different. LTBI was associated with the presence of multiple TB risk factors (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Adoption of a TB risk-focused screening algorithm that does not use CD4 count stratification could prevent more cases of TB reactivation, without changing the case detection rate. These findings should be used to inform a large-scale study to create unified guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3293130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32931302012-03-08 Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study Pollock, Katrina M Tam, Herman Grass, Lisa Bowes, Sharleen Cooke, Graham S Pareek, Manish Montamat-Sicotte, Damien Kapembwa, Moses Taylor, Graham P Lalvani, Ajit BMJ Open Health Policy BACKGROUND: HIV is the most important risk factor for progression of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to active tuberculosis (TB). Detection and treatment of LTBI is necessary to reduce the increasing burden of TB in the UK, but a unified LTBI screening approach has not been adopted. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a TB risk-focused approach to LTBI screening in the HIV-positive population against current UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two urban HIV treatment centres in London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 114 HIV-infected individuals with defined TB risk factors were enrolled prospectively as part of ongoing studies into HIV and TB co-infection. OUTCOME MEASURES: The yield and case detection rate of LTBI cases within the research study were compared with those generated by the NICE criteria. RESULTS: 17/114 (14.9%, 95% CI 8.3 to 21.5) had evidence of LTBI. Limiting screening to those meeting NICE criteria for the general population (n=43) would have detected just over half of these, 9/43 (20.9%, 95% CI 8.3 to 33.5) and those meeting criteria for HIV co-infection (n=74) would only have captured 8/74(10.8%, 95% CI 3.6 to 18.1) cases. The case detection rates from the study and NICE approaches were not significantly different. LTBI was associated with the presence of multiple TB risk factors (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Adoption of a TB risk-focused screening algorithm that does not use CD4 count stratification could prevent more cases of TB reactivation, without changing the case detection rate. These findings should be used to inform a large-scale study to create unified guidelines. BMJ Group 2012-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3293130/ /pubmed/22382123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000762 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Pollock, Katrina M Tam, Herman Grass, Lisa Bowes, Sharleen Cooke, Graham S Pareek, Manish Montamat-Sicotte, Damien Kapembwa, Moses Taylor, Graham P Lalvani, Ajit Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study |
title | Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study |
title_full | Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study |
title_short | Comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the HIV-positive population: a cohort study |
title_sort | comparison of screening strategies to improve the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in the hiv-positive population: a cohort study |
topic | Health Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22382123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000762 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pollockkatrinam comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy AT tamherman comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy AT grasslisa comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy AT bowessharleen comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy AT cookegrahams comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy AT pareekmanish comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy AT montamatsicottedamien comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy AT kapembwamoses comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy AT taylorgrahamp comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy AT lalvaniajit comparisonofscreeningstrategiestoimprovethediagnosisoflatenttuberculosisinfectioninthehivpositivepopulationacohortstudy |