Cargando…
Tracking Replicability as a Method of Post-Publication Open Evaluation
Recent reports have suggested that many published results are unreliable. To increase the reliability and accuracy of published papers, multiple changes have been proposed, such as changes in statistical methods. We support such reforms. However, we believe that the incentive structure of scientific...
Autores principales: | Hartshorne, Joshua K., Schachner, Adena |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22403538 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00008 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science
por: Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
Publicado: (2012) -
Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation
por: Hunter, Jane
Publicado: (2012) -
Expectancy Effects Threaten the Inferential Validity of Synchrony-Prosociality Research
por: Atwood, S., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
5-HT1a Receptor Involvement in Temporal Memory and the Response to Temporal Ambiguity
por: Shapiro, Zvi R., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings
por: Florian, Răzvan V.
Publicado: (2012)