Cargando…

An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies

BACKGROUND: The combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation with two-channel microarray technology enables genome-wide mapping of binding sites of DNA-interacting proteins (ChIP-on-chip) or sites with methylated CpG di-nucleotides (DNA methylation microarray). These powerful tools are the gateway t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adriaens, Michiel E, Jaillard, Magali, Eijssen, Lars MT, Mayer, Claus-Dieter, Evelo, Chris TA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22276688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-42
_version_ 1782225406043095040
author Adriaens, Michiel E
Jaillard, Magali
Eijssen, Lars MT
Mayer, Claus-Dieter
Evelo, Chris TA
author_facet Adriaens, Michiel E
Jaillard, Magali
Eijssen, Lars MT
Mayer, Claus-Dieter
Evelo, Chris TA
author_sort Adriaens, Michiel E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation with two-channel microarray technology enables genome-wide mapping of binding sites of DNA-interacting proteins (ChIP-on-chip) or sites with methylated CpG di-nucleotides (DNA methylation microarray). These powerful tools are the gateway to understanding gene transcription regulation. Since the goals of such studies, the sample preparation procedures, the microarray content and study design are all different from transcriptomics microarrays, the data pre-processing strategies traditionally applied to transcriptomics microarrays may not be appropriate. Particularly, the main challenge of the normalization of "regulation microarrays" is (i) to make the data of individual microarrays quantitatively comparable and (ii) to keep the signals of the enriched probes, representing DNA sequences from the precipitate, as distinguishable as possible from the signals of the un-enriched probes, representing DNA sequences largely absent from the precipitate. RESULTS: We compare several widely used normalization approaches (VSN, LOWESS, quantile, T-quantile, Tukey's biweight scaling, Peng's method) applied to a selection of regulation microarray datasets, ranging from DNA methylation to transcription factor binding and histone modification studies. Through comparison of the data distributions of control probes and gene promoter probes before and after normalization, and assessment of the power to identify known enriched genomic regions after normalization, we demonstrate that there are clear differences in performance between normalization procedures. CONCLUSION: T-quantile normalization applied separately on the channels and Tukey's biweight scaling outperform other methods in terms of the conservation of enriched and un-enriched signal separation, as well as in identification of genomic regions known to be enriched. T-quantile normalization is preferable as it additionally improves comparability between microarrays. In contrast, popular normalization approaches like quantile, LOWESS, Peng's method and VSN normalization alter the data distributions of regulation microarrays to such an extent that using these approaches will impact the reliability of the downstream analysis substantially.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3293711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32937112012-03-06 An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies Adriaens, Michiel E Jaillard, Magali Eijssen, Lars MT Mayer, Claus-Dieter Evelo, Chris TA BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation with two-channel microarray technology enables genome-wide mapping of binding sites of DNA-interacting proteins (ChIP-on-chip) or sites with methylated CpG di-nucleotides (DNA methylation microarray). These powerful tools are the gateway to understanding gene transcription regulation. Since the goals of such studies, the sample preparation procedures, the microarray content and study design are all different from transcriptomics microarrays, the data pre-processing strategies traditionally applied to transcriptomics microarrays may not be appropriate. Particularly, the main challenge of the normalization of "regulation microarrays" is (i) to make the data of individual microarrays quantitatively comparable and (ii) to keep the signals of the enriched probes, representing DNA sequences from the precipitate, as distinguishable as possible from the signals of the un-enriched probes, representing DNA sequences largely absent from the precipitate. RESULTS: We compare several widely used normalization approaches (VSN, LOWESS, quantile, T-quantile, Tukey's biweight scaling, Peng's method) applied to a selection of regulation microarray datasets, ranging from DNA methylation to transcription factor binding and histone modification studies. Through comparison of the data distributions of control probes and gene promoter probes before and after normalization, and assessment of the power to identify known enriched genomic regions after normalization, we demonstrate that there are clear differences in performance between normalization procedures. CONCLUSION: T-quantile normalization applied separately on the channels and Tukey's biweight scaling outperform other methods in terms of the conservation of enriched and un-enriched signal separation, as well as in identification of genomic regions known to be enriched. T-quantile normalization is preferable as it additionally improves comparability between microarrays. In contrast, popular normalization approaches like quantile, LOWESS, Peng's method and VSN normalization alter the data distributions of regulation microarrays to such an extent that using these approaches will impact the reliability of the downstream analysis substantially. BioMed Central 2012-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3293711/ /pubmed/22276688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-42 Text en Copyright ©2012 Adriaens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Adriaens, Michiel E
Jaillard, Magali
Eijssen, Lars MT
Mayer, Claus-Dieter
Evelo, Chris TA
An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies
title An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies
title_full An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies
title_fullStr An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies
title_short An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies
title_sort evaluation of two-channel chip-on-chip and dna methylation microarray normalization strategies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22276688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-42
work_keys_str_mv AT adriaensmichiele anevaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies
AT jaillardmagali anevaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies
AT eijssenlarsmt anevaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies
AT mayerclausdieter anevaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies
AT evelochrista anevaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies
AT adriaensmichiele evaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies
AT jaillardmagali evaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies
AT eijssenlarsmt evaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies
AT mayerclausdieter evaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies
AT evelochrista evaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies