Cargando…
An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies
BACKGROUND: The combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation with two-channel microarray technology enables genome-wide mapping of binding sites of DNA-interacting proteins (ChIP-on-chip) or sites with methylated CpG di-nucleotides (DNA methylation microarray). These powerful tools are the gateway t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22276688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-42 |
_version_ | 1782225406043095040 |
---|---|
author | Adriaens, Michiel E Jaillard, Magali Eijssen, Lars MT Mayer, Claus-Dieter Evelo, Chris TA |
author_facet | Adriaens, Michiel E Jaillard, Magali Eijssen, Lars MT Mayer, Claus-Dieter Evelo, Chris TA |
author_sort | Adriaens, Michiel E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation with two-channel microarray technology enables genome-wide mapping of binding sites of DNA-interacting proteins (ChIP-on-chip) or sites with methylated CpG di-nucleotides (DNA methylation microarray). These powerful tools are the gateway to understanding gene transcription regulation. Since the goals of such studies, the sample preparation procedures, the microarray content and study design are all different from transcriptomics microarrays, the data pre-processing strategies traditionally applied to transcriptomics microarrays may not be appropriate. Particularly, the main challenge of the normalization of "regulation microarrays" is (i) to make the data of individual microarrays quantitatively comparable and (ii) to keep the signals of the enriched probes, representing DNA sequences from the precipitate, as distinguishable as possible from the signals of the un-enriched probes, representing DNA sequences largely absent from the precipitate. RESULTS: We compare several widely used normalization approaches (VSN, LOWESS, quantile, T-quantile, Tukey's biweight scaling, Peng's method) applied to a selection of regulation microarray datasets, ranging from DNA methylation to transcription factor binding and histone modification studies. Through comparison of the data distributions of control probes and gene promoter probes before and after normalization, and assessment of the power to identify known enriched genomic regions after normalization, we demonstrate that there are clear differences in performance between normalization procedures. CONCLUSION: T-quantile normalization applied separately on the channels and Tukey's biweight scaling outperform other methods in terms of the conservation of enriched and un-enriched signal separation, as well as in identification of genomic regions known to be enriched. T-quantile normalization is preferable as it additionally improves comparability between microarrays. In contrast, popular normalization approaches like quantile, LOWESS, Peng's method and VSN normalization alter the data distributions of regulation microarrays to such an extent that using these approaches will impact the reliability of the downstream analysis substantially. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3293711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32937112012-03-06 An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies Adriaens, Michiel E Jaillard, Magali Eijssen, Lars MT Mayer, Claus-Dieter Evelo, Chris TA BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation with two-channel microarray technology enables genome-wide mapping of binding sites of DNA-interacting proteins (ChIP-on-chip) or sites with methylated CpG di-nucleotides (DNA methylation microarray). These powerful tools are the gateway to understanding gene transcription regulation. Since the goals of such studies, the sample preparation procedures, the microarray content and study design are all different from transcriptomics microarrays, the data pre-processing strategies traditionally applied to transcriptomics microarrays may not be appropriate. Particularly, the main challenge of the normalization of "regulation microarrays" is (i) to make the data of individual microarrays quantitatively comparable and (ii) to keep the signals of the enriched probes, representing DNA sequences from the precipitate, as distinguishable as possible from the signals of the un-enriched probes, representing DNA sequences largely absent from the precipitate. RESULTS: We compare several widely used normalization approaches (VSN, LOWESS, quantile, T-quantile, Tukey's biweight scaling, Peng's method) applied to a selection of regulation microarray datasets, ranging from DNA methylation to transcription factor binding and histone modification studies. Through comparison of the data distributions of control probes and gene promoter probes before and after normalization, and assessment of the power to identify known enriched genomic regions after normalization, we demonstrate that there are clear differences in performance between normalization procedures. CONCLUSION: T-quantile normalization applied separately on the channels and Tukey's biweight scaling outperform other methods in terms of the conservation of enriched and un-enriched signal separation, as well as in identification of genomic regions known to be enriched. T-quantile normalization is preferable as it additionally improves comparability between microarrays. In contrast, popular normalization approaches like quantile, LOWESS, Peng's method and VSN normalization alter the data distributions of regulation microarrays to such an extent that using these approaches will impact the reliability of the downstream analysis substantially. BioMed Central 2012-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3293711/ /pubmed/22276688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-42 Text en Copyright ©2012 Adriaens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Adriaens, Michiel E Jaillard, Magali Eijssen, Lars MT Mayer, Claus-Dieter Evelo, Chris TA An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies |
title | An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies |
title_full | An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies |
title_short | An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies |
title_sort | evaluation of two-channel chip-on-chip and dna methylation microarray normalization strategies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22276688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-42 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adriaensmichiele anevaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies AT jaillardmagali anevaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies AT eijssenlarsmt anevaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies AT mayerclausdieter anevaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies AT evelochrista anevaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies AT adriaensmichiele evaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies AT jaillardmagali evaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies AT eijssenlarsmt evaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies AT mayerclausdieter evaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies AT evelochrista evaluationoftwochannelchiponchipanddnamethylationmicroarraynormalizationstrategies |