Cargando…
Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study
Background: Environmental health research involving community participation has increased substantially since the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) environmental justice and community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships began in the mid-1990s. The goals of thes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3295345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22147336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103734 |
_version_ | 1782225555617218560 |
---|---|
author | Brown, Phil Brody, Julia Green Morello-Frosch, Rachel Tovar, Jessica Zota, Ami R. Rudel, Ruthann A. |
author_facet | Brown, Phil Brody, Julia Green Morello-Frosch, Rachel Tovar, Jessica Zota, Ami R. Rudel, Ruthann A. |
author_sort | Brown, Phil |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Environmental health research involving community participation has increased substantially since the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) environmental justice and community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships began in the mid-1990s. The goals of these partnerships are to inform and empower better decisions about exposures, foster trust, and generate scientific knowledge to reduce environmental health disparities in low-income, minority communities. Peer-reviewed publication and clinical health outcomes alone are inadequate criteria to judge the success of projects in meeting these goals; therefore, new strategies for evaluating success are needed. Objectives: We reviewed the methods used to evaluate our project, “Linking Breast Cancer Advocacy and Environmental Justice,” to help identify successful CBPR methods and to assist other teams in documenting effectiveness. Although our project precedes the development of the NIEHS Evaluation Metrics Manual, a schema to evaluate the success of projects funded through the Partnerships in Environmental Public Health (PEPH), our work reported here illustrates the record keeping and self-reflection anticipated in NIEHS’s PEPH. Discussion: Evaluation strategies should assess how CBPR partnerships meet the goals of all partners. Our partnership, which included two strong community-based organizations, produced a team that helped all partners gain organizational capacity. Environmental sampling in homes and reporting the results of that effort had community education and constituency-building benefits. Scientific results contributed to a court decision that required cumulative impact assessment for an oil refinery and to new policies for chemicals used in consumer products. All partners leveraged additional funding to extend their work. Conclusions: An appropriate evaluation strategy can demonstrate how CBPR projects can advance science, support community empowerment, increase environmental health literacy, and generate individual and policy action to protect health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3295345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32953452012-03-26 Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study Brown, Phil Brody, Julia Green Morello-Frosch, Rachel Tovar, Jessica Zota, Ami R. Rudel, Ruthann A. Environ Health Perspect Commentary Background: Environmental health research involving community participation has increased substantially since the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) environmental justice and community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships began in the mid-1990s. The goals of these partnerships are to inform and empower better decisions about exposures, foster trust, and generate scientific knowledge to reduce environmental health disparities in low-income, minority communities. Peer-reviewed publication and clinical health outcomes alone are inadequate criteria to judge the success of projects in meeting these goals; therefore, new strategies for evaluating success are needed. Objectives: We reviewed the methods used to evaluate our project, “Linking Breast Cancer Advocacy and Environmental Justice,” to help identify successful CBPR methods and to assist other teams in documenting effectiveness. Although our project precedes the development of the NIEHS Evaluation Metrics Manual, a schema to evaluate the success of projects funded through the Partnerships in Environmental Public Health (PEPH), our work reported here illustrates the record keeping and self-reflection anticipated in NIEHS’s PEPH. Discussion: Evaluation strategies should assess how CBPR partnerships meet the goals of all partners. Our partnership, which included two strong community-based organizations, produced a team that helped all partners gain organizational capacity. Environmental sampling in homes and reporting the results of that effort had community education and constituency-building benefits. Scientific results contributed to a court decision that required cumulative impact assessment for an oil refinery and to new policies for chemicals used in consumer products. All partners leveraged additional funding to extend their work. Conclusions: An appropriate evaluation strategy can demonstrate how CBPR projects can advance science, support community empowerment, increase environmental health literacy, and generate individual and policy action to protect health. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2011-12-06 2012-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3295345/ /pubmed/22147336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103734 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Brown, Phil Brody, Julia Green Morello-Frosch, Rachel Tovar, Jessica Zota, Ami R. Rudel, Ruthann A. Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study |
title | Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study |
title_full | Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study |
title_fullStr | Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study |
title_short | Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study |
title_sort | measuring the success of community science: the northern california household exposure study |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3295345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22147336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103734 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownphil measuringthesuccessofcommunitysciencethenortherncaliforniahouseholdexposurestudy AT brodyjuliagreen measuringthesuccessofcommunitysciencethenortherncaliforniahouseholdexposurestudy AT morellofroschrachel measuringthesuccessofcommunitysciencethenortherncaliforniahouseholdexposurestudy AT tovarjessica measuringthesuccessofcommunitysciencethenortherncaliforniahouseholdexposurestudy AT zotaamir measuringthesuccessofcommunitysciencethenortherncaliforniahouseholdexposurestudy AT rudelruthanna measuringthesuccessofcommunitysciencethenortherncaliforniahouseholdexposurestudy |