Cargando…

Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study

Background: Environmental health research involving community participation has increased substantially since the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) environmental justice and community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships began in the mid-1990s. The goals of thes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Phil, Brody, Julia Green, Morello-Frosch, Rachel, Tovar, Jessica, Zota, Ami R., Rudel, Ruthann A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3295345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22147336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103734
_version_ 1782225555617218560
author Brown, Phil
Brody, Julia Green
Morello-Frosch, Rachel
Tovar, Jessica
Zota, Ami R.
Rudel, Ruthann A.
author_facet Brown, Phil
Brody, Julia Green
Morello-Frosch, Rachel
Tovar, Jessica
Zota, Ami R.
Rudel, Ruthann A.
author_sort Brown, Phil
collection PubMed
description Background: Environmental health research involving community participation has increased substantially since the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) environmental justice and community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships began in the mid-1990s. The goals of these partnerships are to inform and empower better decisions about exposures, foster trust, and generate scientific knowledge to reduce environmental health disparities in low-income, minority communities. Peer-reviewed publication and clinical health outcomes alone are inadequate criteria to judge the success of projects in meeting these goals; therefore, new strategies for evaluating success are needed. Objectives: We reviewed the methods used to evaluate our project, “Linking Breast Cancer Advocacy and Environmental Justice,” to help identify successful CBPR methods and to assist other teams in documenting effectiveness. Although our project precedes the development of the NIEHS Evaluation Metrics Manual, a schema to evaluate the success of projects funded through the Partnerships in Environmental Public Health (PEPH), our work reported here illustrates the record keeping and self-reflection anticipated in NIEHS’s PEPH. Discussion: Evaluation strategies should assess how CBPR partnerships meet the goals of all partners. Our partnership, which included two strong community-based organizations, produced a team that helped all partners gain organizational capacity. Environmental sampling in homes and reporting the results of that effort had community education and constituency-building benefits. Scientific results contributed to a court decision that required cumulative impact assessment for an oil refinery and to new policies for chemicals used in consumer products. All partners leveraged additional funding to extend their work. Conclusions: An appropriate evaluation strategy can demonstrate how CBPR projects can advance science, support community empowerment, increase environmental health literacy, and generate individual and policy action to protect health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3295345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32953452012-03-26 Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study Brown, Phil Brody, Julia Green Morello-Frosch, Rachel Tovar, Jessica Zota, Ami R. Rudel, Ruthann A. Environ Health Perspect Commentary Background: Environmental health research involving community participation has increased substantially since the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) environmental justice and community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships began in the mid-1990s. The goals of these partnerships are to inform and empower better decisions about exposures, foster trust, and generate scientific knowledge to reduce environmental health disparities in low-income, minority communities. Peer-reviewed publication and clinical health outcomes alone are inadequate criteria to judge the success of projects in meeting these goals; therefore, new strategies for evaluating success are needed. Objectives: We reviewed the methods used to evaluate our project, “Linking Breast Cancer Advocacy and Environmental Justice,” to help identify successful CBPR methods and to assist other teams in documenting effectiveness. Although our project precedes the development of the NIEHS Evaluation Metrics Manual, a schema to evaluate the success of projects funded through the Partnerships in Environmental Public Health (PEPH), our work reported here illustrates the record keeping and self-reflection anticipated in NIEHS’s PEPH. Discussion: Evaluation strategies should assess how CBPR partnerships meet the goals of all partners. Our partnership, which included two strong community-based organizations, produced a team that helped all partners gain organizational capacity. Environmental sampling in homes and reporting the results of that effort had community education and constituency-building benefits. Scientific results contributed to a court decision that required cumulative impact assessment for an oil refinery and to new policies for chemicals used in consumer products. All partners leveraged additional funding to extend their work. Conclusions: An appropriate evaluation strategy can demonstrate how CBPR projects can advance science, support community empowerment, increase environmental health literacy, and generate individual and policy action to protect health. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2011-12-06 2012-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3295345/ /pubmed/22147336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103734 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Commentary
Brown, Phil
Brody, Julia Green
Morello-Frosch, Rachel
Tovar, Jessica
Zota, Ami R.
Rudel, Ruthann A.
Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study
title Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study
title_full Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study
title_fullStr Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study
title_short Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study
title_sort measuring the success of community science: the northern california household exposure study
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3295345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22147336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103734
work_keys_str_mv AT brownphil measuringthesuccessofcommunitysciencethenortherncaliforniahouseholdexposurestudy
AT brodyjuliagreen measuringthesuccessofcommunitysciencethenortherncaliforniahouseholdexposurestudy
AT morellofroschrachel measuringthesuccessofcommunitysciencethenortherncaliforniahouseholdexposurestudy
AT tovarjessica measuringthesuccessofcommunitysciencethenortherncaliforniahouseholdexposurestudy
AT zotaamir measuringthesuccessofcommunitysciencethenortherncaliforniahouseholdexposurestudy
AT rudelruthanna measuringthesuccessofcommunitysciencethenortherncaliforniahouseholdexposurestudy