Cargando…
The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study
BACKGROUND: Globally, diabetes is estimated to affect 246 million people and is increasing. In Australia diabetes has been made a national health priority. While the direct costs of treating diabetes are substantial, and rising, the indirect costs are considered greater. There is evidence that inter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3295674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22225701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-16 |
_version_ | 1782225617138221056 |
---|---|
author | Passey, Megan E Shrestha, Rupendra N Bertram, Melanie Y Schofield, Deborah J Vos, Theo Callander, Emily J Percival, Richard Kelly, Simon J |
author_facet | Passey, Megan E Shrestha, Rupendra N Bertram, Melanie Y Schofield, Deborah J Vos, Theo Callander, Emily J Percival, Richard Kelly, Simon J |
author_sort | Passey, Megan E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Globally, diabetes is estimated to affect 246 million people and is increasing. In Australia diabetes has been made a national health priority. While the direct costs of treating diabetes are substantial, and rising, the indirect costs are considered greater. There is evidence that interventions to prevent diabetes are effective, and cost-effective, but the impact on labour force participation and income has not been assessed. In this study we quantify the potential impact of implementing a diabetes prevention program, using screening and either metformin or a lifestyle intervention on individual economic outcomes of pre-diabetic Australians aged 45-64. METHODS: The output of an epidemiological microsimulation model of the reduction in prevalence of diabetes from a lifestyle or metformin intervention, and another microsimulation model, Health&WealthMOD, of health and the associated impacts on labour force participation, personal income, savings, government revenue and expenditure were used to quantify the estimated outcomes of the two interventions. RESULTS: An additional 753 person years in the labour force would have been achieved from 1993 to 2003 for the male cohort aged 60-64 years in 2003, if a lifestyle intervention had been introduced in 1983; with 890 person years for the equivalent female group. The impact on labour force participation was lower for the metformin intervention, and increased with age for both interventions. The male cohort aged 60-64 years in 2003 would have earned an additional $30 million in income with the metformin intervention, and the equivalent female cohort would have earned an additional $25 million. If the lifestyle intervention was introduced, the same male and female cohorts would have earned an additional $34 million and $28 million respectively from 1993 to 2003. For the individuals involved, on average, males would have earned an additional $44,600 per year and females an additional $31,800 per year, if they had continued to work as a result of preventing diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to improved health and wellbeing, considerable benefits to individuals, in terms of both additional working years and increased personal income, could be made by introducing either a lifestyle or metformin intervention to prevent diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3295674 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32956742012-03-07 The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study Passey, Megan E Shrestha, Rupendra N Bertram, Melanie Y Schofield, Deborah J Vos, Theo Callander, Emily J Percival, Richard Kelly, Simon J BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Globally, diabetes is estimated to affect 246 million people and is increasing. In Australia diabetes has been made a national health priority. While the direct costs of treating diabetes are substantial, and rising, the indirect costs are considered greater. There is evidence that interventions to prevent diabetes are effective, and cost-effective, but the impact on labour force participation and income has not been assessed. In this study we quantify the potential impact of implementing a diabetes prevention program, using screening and either metformin or a lifestyle intervention on individual economic outcomes of pre-diabetic Australians aged 45-64. METHODS: The output of an epidemiological microsimulation model of the reduction in prevalence of diabetes from a lifestyle or metformin intervention, and another microsimulation model, Health&WealthMOD, of health and the associated impacts on labour force participation, personal income, savings, government revenue and expenditure were used to quantify the estimated outcomes of the two interventions. RESULTS: An additional 753 person years in the labour force would have been achieved from 1993 to 2003 for the male cohort aged 60-64 years in 2003, if a lifestyle intervention had been introduced in 1983; with 890 person years for the equivalent female group. The impact on labour force participation was lower for the metformin intervention, and increased with age for both interventions. The male cohort aged 60-64 years in 2003 would have earned an additional $30 million in income with the metformin intervention, and the equivalent female cohort would have earned an additional $25 million. If the lifestyle intervention was introduced, the same male and female cohorts would have earned an additional $34 million and $28 million respectively from 1993 to 2003. For the individuals involved, on average, males would have earned an additional $44,600 per year and females an additional $31,800 per year, if they had continued to work as a result of preventing diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to improved health and wellbeing, considerable benefits to individuals, in terms of both additional working years and increased personal income, could be made by introducing either a lifestyle or metformin intervention to prevent diabetes. BioMed Central 2012-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3295674/ /pubmed/22225701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-16 Text en Copyright ©2011 Passey et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Passey, Megan E Shrestha, Rupendra N Bertram, Melanie Y Schofield, Deborah J Vos, Theo Callander, Emily J Percival, Richard Kelly, Simon J The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study |
title | The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study |
title_full | The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study |
title_fullStr | The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study |
title_short | The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study |
title_sort | impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older australians: an economic study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3295674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22225701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT passeymegane theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT shrestharupendran theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT bertrammelaniey theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT schofielddeborahj theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT vostheo theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT callanderemilyj theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT percivalrichard theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT kellysimonj theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT passeymegane impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT shrestharupendran impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT bertrammelaniey impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT schofielddeborahj impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT vostheo impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT callanderemilyj impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT percivalrichard impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy AT kellysimonj impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy |