Cargando…

The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study

BACKGROUND: Globally, diabetes is estimated to affect 246 million people and is increasing. In Australia diabetes has been made a national health priority. While the direct costs of treating diabetes are substantial, and rising, the indirect costs are considered greater. There is evidence that inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Passey, Megan E, Shrestha, Rupendra N, Bertram, Melanie Y, Schofield, Deborah J, Vos, Theo, Callander, Emily J, Percival, Richard, Kelly, Simon J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3295674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22225701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-16
_version_ 1782225617138221056
author Passey, Megan E
Shrestha, Rupendra N
Bertram, Melanie Y
Schofield, Deborah J
Vos, Theo
Callander, Emily J
Percival, Richard
Kelly, Simon J
author_facet Passey, Megan E
Shrestha, Rupendra N
Bertram, Melanie Y
Schofield, Deborah J
Vos, Theo
Callander, Emily J
Percival, Richard
Kelly, Simon J
author_sort Passey, Megan E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Globally, diabetes is estimated to affect 246 million people and is increasing. In Australia diabetes has been made a national health priority. While the direct costs of treating diabetes are substantial, and rising, the indirect costs are considered greater. There is evidence that interventions to prevent diabetes are effective, and cost-effective, but the impact on labour force participation and income has not been assessed. In this study we quantify the potential impact of implementing a diabetes prevention program, using screening and either metformin or a lifestyle intervention on individual economic outcomes of pre-diabetic Australians aged 45-64. METHODS: The output of an epidemiological microsimulation model of the reduction in prevalence of diabetes from a lifestyle or metformin intervention, and another microsimulation model, Health&WealthMOD, of health and the associated impacts on labour force participation, personal income, savings, government revenue and expenditure were used to quantify the estimated outcomes of the two interventions. RESULTS: An additional 753 person years in the labour force would have been achieved from 1993 to 2003 for the male cohort aged 60-64 years in 2003, if a lifestyle intervention had been introduced in 1983; with 890 person years for the equivalent female group. The impact on labour force participation was lower for the metformin intervention, and increased with age for both interventions. The male cohort aged 60-64 years in 2003 would have earned an additional $30 million in income with the metformin intervention, and the equivalent female cohort would have earned an additional $25 million. If the lifestyle intervention was introduced, the same male and female cohorts would have earned an additional $34 million and $28 million respectively from 1993 to 2003. For the individuals involved, on average, males would have earned an additional $44,600 per year and females an additional $31,800 per year, if they had continued to work as a result of preventing diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to improved health and wellbeing, considerable benefits to individuals, in terms of both additional working years and increased personal income, could be made by introducing either a lifestyle or metformin intervention to prevent diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3295674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32956742012-03-07 The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study Passey, Megan E Shrestha, Rupendra N Bertram, Melanie Y Schofield, Deborah J Vos, Theo Callander, Emily J Percival, Richard Kelly, Simon J BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Globally, diabetes is estimated to affect 246 million people and is increasing. In Australia diabetes has been made a national health priority. While the direct costs of treating diabetes are substantial, and rising, the indirect costs are considered greater. There is evidence that interventions to prevent diabetes are effective, and cost-effective, but the impact on labour force participation and income has not been assessed. In this study we quantify the potential impact of implementing a diabetes prevention program, using screening and either metformin or a lifestyle intervention on individual economic outcomes of pre-diabetic Australians aged 45-64. METHODS: The output of an epidemiological microsimulation model of the reduction in prevalence of diabetes from a lifestyle or metformin intervention, and another microsimulation model, Health&WealthMOD, of health and the associated impacts on labour force participation, personal income, savings, government revenue and expenditure were used to quantify the estimated outcomes of the two interventions. RESULTS: An additional 753 person years in the labour force would have been achieved from 1993 to 2003 for the male cohort aged 60-64 years in 2003, if a lifestyle intervention had been introduced in 1983; with 890 person years for the equivalent female group. The impact on labour force participation was lower for the metformin intervention, and increased with age for both interventions. The male cohort aged 60-64 years in 2003 would have earned an additional $30 million in income with the metformin intervention, and the equivalent female cohort would have earned an additional $25 million. If the lifestyle intervention was introduced, the same male and female cohorts would have earned an additional $34 million and $28 million respectively from 1993 to 2003. For the individuals involved, on average, males would have earned an additional $44,600 per year and females an additional $31,800 per year, if they had continued to work as a result of preventing diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to improved health and wellbeing, considerable benefits to individuals, in terms of both additional working years and increased personal income, could be made by introducing either a lifestyle or metformin intervention to prevent diabetes. BioMed Central 2012-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3295674/ /pubmed/22225701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-16 Text en Copyright ©2011 Passey et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Passey, Megan E
Shrestha, Rupendra N
Bertram, Melanie Y
Schofield, Deborah J
Vos, Theo
Callander, Emily J
Percival, Richard
Kelly, Simon J
The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study
title The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study
title_full The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study
title_fullStr The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study
title_full_unstemmed The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study
title_short The impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older Australians: an economic study
title_sort impact of diabetes prevention on labour force participation and income of older australians: an economic study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3295674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22225701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-16
work_keys_str_mv AT passeymegane theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT shrestharupendran theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT bertrammelaniey theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT schofielddeborahj theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT vostheo theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT callanderemilyj theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT percivalrichard theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT kellysimonj theimpactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT passeymegane impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT shrestharupendran impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT bertrammelaniey impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT schofielddeborahj impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT vostheo impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT callanderemilyj impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT percivalrichard impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy
AT kellysimonj impactofdiabetespreventiononlabourforceparticipationandincomeofolderaustraliansaneconomicstudy