Cargando…
Comparative Resistance of AH26 and a New Sealer Prototype to a Bacterial Challenge
Objective. This study compared the leakage resistance of a New Sealer Prototype (NSP) with a traditional sealer (AH 26) in Resilon-filled roots subjected to a bacterial challenge. Study Design. 41 roots were instrumented to ISO size 50 apically. Group 1 (n = 20) contained Resilon and AH 26 sealer an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/365231 |
_version_ | 1782225675780882432 |
---|---|
author | Duggan, Derek Zhong, Sheng Rivera, Eric Arnold, Roland Simmons, Eric |
author_facet | Duggan, Derek Zhong, Sheng Rivera, Eric Arnold, Roland Simmons, Eric |
author_sort | Duggan, Derek |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. This study compared the leakage resistance of a New Sealer Prototype (NSP) with a traditional sealer (AH 26) in Resilon-filled roots subjected to a bacterial challenge. Study Design. 41 roots were instrumented to ISO size 50 apically. Group 1 (n = 20) contained Resilon and AH 26 sealer and roots in group 2 (n = 21) contained Resilon and NSP. Roots were embedded in a dual-chamber model with the upper chamber containing Streptococcus mutans inoculum. Evidence of bacterial penetration was observed for 1 month. Fisher's Test was used to analyze the data. Results. 8 of 20 roots (40%) in the AH 26 group demonstrated leakage whereas 3 of 21 roots (14%) in the NSP group leaked. The difference in leakage rates was not statistically significant (P = 0.053). Conclusion. The traditional sealer (AH 26) demonstrated increased leakage rates compared to the New Sealer Prototype (NSP), but the difference did not reach statistical significance in this study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3296140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32961402012-04-13 Comparative Resistance of AH26 and a New Sealer Prototype to a Bacterial Challenge Duggan, Derek Zhong, Sheng Rivera, Eric Arnold, Roland Simmons, Eric Int J Dent Research Article Objective. This study compared the leakage resistance of a New Sealer Prototype (NSP) with a traditional sealer (AH 26) in Resilon-filled roots subjected to a bacterial challenge. Study Design. 41 roots were instrumented to ISO size 50 apically. Group 1 (n = 20) contained Resilon and AH 26 sealer and roots in group 2 (n = 21) contained Resilon and NSP. Roots were embedded in a dual-chamber model with the upper chamber containing Streptococcus mutans inoculum. Evidence of bacterial penetration was observed for 1 month. Fisher's Test was used to analyze the data. Results. 8 of 20 roots (40%) in the AH 26 group demonstrated leakage whereas 3 of 21 roots (14%) in the NSP group leaked. The difference in leakage rates was not statistically significant (P = 0.053). Conclusion. The traditional sealer (AH 26) demonstrated increased leakage rates compared to the New Sealer Prototype (NSP), but the difference did not reach statistical significance in this study. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3296140/ /pubmed/22505898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/365231 Text en Copyright © 2012 Derek Duggan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Duggan, Derek Zhong, Sheng Rivera, Eric Arnold, Roland Simmons, Eric Comparative Resistance of AH26 and a New Sealer Prototype to a Bacterial Challenge |
title | Comparative Resistance of AH26 and a New Sealer Prototype to a Bacterial Challenge |
title_full | Comparative Resistance of AH26 and a New Sealer Prototype to a Bacterial Challenge |
title_fullStr | Comparative Resistance of AH26 and a New Sealer Prototype to a Bacterial Challenge |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Resistance of AH26 and a New Sealer Prototype to a Bacterial Challenge |
title_short | Comparative Resistance of AH26 and a New Sealer Prototype to a Bacterial Challenge |
title_sort | comparative resistance of ah26 and a new sealer prototype to a bacterial challenge |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/365231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dugganderek comparativeresistanceofah26andanewsealerprototypetoabacterialchallenge AT zhongsheng comparativeresistanceofah26andanewsealerprototypetoabacterialchallenge AT riveraeric comparativeresistanceofah26andanewsealerprototypetoabacterialchallenge AT arnoldroland comparativeresistanceofah26andanewsealerprototypetoabacterialchallenge AT simmonseric comparativeresistanceofah26andanewsealerprototypetoabacterialchallenge |