Cargando…
Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications
Recently, a mumps outbreak in New York and New Jersey was reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Subsequently, the dissemination of the disease was rapid, and, from June 28th 2009 through January 29th 2010, a total of 1,521 cases of mumps were reported in New York and New...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/345068 |
_version_ | 1782225676931170304 |
---|---|
author | Lozo, Svjetlana Ahmed, Ahmed Chapnick, Edward O'Keefe, Mary Minkoff, Howard |
author_facet | Lozo, Svjetlana Ahmed, Ahmed Chapnick, Edward O'Keefe, Mary Minkoff, Howard |
author_sort | Lozo, Svjetlana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, a mumps outbreak in New York and New Jersey was reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Subsequently, the dissemination of the disease was rapid, and, from June 28th 2009 through January 29th 2010, a total of 1,521 cases of mumps were reported in New York and New Jersey. Seven presumed cases occurred in pregnant women cared for at our institution. Mumps diagnosis as per the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene was based on clinical manifestations, particularly parotitis. Prior immunizations with mumps vaccine and negative IgM were not adequate to rule out mumps infections. All of our seven patients had exposure to mumps in either their household or their community, and some of the them had symptoms of mumps. Due to the difficulties in interpreting serologies of these patients, their cases led to a presumed diagnosis of mumps. The diagnosis of mumps lead to the isolation of patients and health care personnel that were in contact with them. In this paper, we detail the presenting findings, diagnostic dilemmas and infection control challenges associated with presumed cases of mumps in pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3296145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32961452012-04-13 Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications Lozo, Svjetlana Ahmed, Ahmed Chapnick, Edward O'Keefe, Mary Minkoff, Howard Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Clinical Study Recently, a mumps outbreak in New York and New Jersey was reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Subsequently, the dissemination of the disease was rapid, and, from June 28th 2009 through January 29th 2010, a total of 1,521 cases of mumps were reported in New York and New Jersey. Seven presumed cases occurred in pregnant women cared for at our institution. Mumps diagnosis as per the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene was based on clinical manifestations, particularly parotitis. Prior immunizations with mumps vaccine and negative IgM were not adequate to rule out mumps infections. All of our seven patients had exposure to mumps in either their household or their community, and some of the them had symptoms of mumps. Due to the difficulties in interpreting serologies of these patients, their cases led to a presumed diagnosis of mumps. The diagnosis of mumps lead to the isolation of patients and health care personnel that were in contact with them. In this paper, we detail the presenting findings, diagnostic dilemmas and infection control challenges associated with presumed cases of mumps in pregnancy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3296145/ /pubmed/22505798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/345068 Text en Copyright © 2012 Svjetlana Lozo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Lozo, Svjetlana Ahmed, Ahmed Chapnick, Edward O'Keefe, Mary Minkoff, Howard Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications |
title | Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications |
title_full | Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications |
title_fullStr | Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications |
title_full_unstemmed | Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications |
title_short | Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications |
title_sort | presumed cases of mumps in pregnancy: clinical and infection control implications |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/345068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lozosvjetlana presumedcasesofmumpsinpregnancyclinicalandinfectioncontrolimplications AT ahmedahmed presumedcasesofmumpsinpregnancyclinicalandinfectioncontrolimplications AT chapnickedward presumedcasesofmumpsinpregnancyclinicalandinfectioncontrolimplications AT okeefemary presumedcasesofmumpsinpregnancyclinicalandinfectioncontrolimplications AT minkoffhoward presumedcasesofmumpsinpregnancyclinicalandinfectioncontrolimplications |