Cargando…

Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications

Recently, a mumps outbreak in New York and New Jersey was reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Subsequently, the dissemination of the disease was rapid, and, from June 28th 2009 through January 29th 2010, a total of 1,521 cases of mumps were reported in New York and New...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lozo, Svjetlana, Ahmed, Ahmed, Chapnick, Edward, O'Keefe, Mary, Minkoff, Howard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/345068
_version_ 1782225676931170304
author Lozo, Svjetlana
Ahmed, Ahmed
Chapnick, Edward
O'Keefe, Mary
Minkoff, Howard
author_facet Lozo, Svjetlana
Ahmed, Ahmed
Chapnick, Edward
O'Keefe, Mary
Minkoff, Howard
author_sort Lozo, Svjetlana
collection PubMed
description Recently, a mumps outbreak in New York and New Jersey was reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Subsequently, the dissemination of the disease was rapid, and, from June 28th 2009 through January 29th 2010, a total of 1,521 cases of mumps were reported in New York and New Jersey. Seven presumed cases occurred in pregnant women cared for at our institution. Mumps diagnosis as per the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene was based on clinical manifestations, particularly parotitis. Prior immunizations with mumps vaccine and negative IgM were not adequate to rule out mumps infections. All of our seven patients had exposure to mumps in either their household or their community, and some of the them had symptoms of mumps. Due to the difficulties in interpreting serologies of these patients, their cases led to a presumed diagnosis of mumps. The diagnosis of mumps lead to the isolation of patients and health care personnel that were in contact with them. In this paper, we detail the presenting findings, diagnostic dilemmas and infection control challenges associated with presumed cases of mumps in pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3296145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32961452012-04-13 Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications Lozo, Svjetlana Ahmed, Ahmed Chapnick, Edward O'Keefe, Mary Minkoff, Howard Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Clinical Study Recently, a mumps outbreak in New York and New Jersey was reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Subsequently, the dissemination of the disease was rapid, and, from June 28th 2009 through January 29th 2010, a total of 1,521 cases of mumps were reported in New York and New Jersey. Seven presumed cases occurred in pregnant women cared for at our institution. Mumps diagnosis as per the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene was based on clinical manifestations, particularly parotitis. Prior immunizations with mumps vaccine and negative IgM were not adequate to rule out mumps infections. All of our seven patients had exposure to mumps in either their household or their community, and some of the them had symptoms of mumps. Due to the difficulties in interpreting serologies of these patients, their cases led to a presumed diagnosis of mumps. The diagnosis of mumps lead to the isolation of patients and health care personnel that were in contact with them. In this paper, we detail the presenting findings, diagnostic dilemmas and infection control challenges associated with presumed cases of mumps in pregnancy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3296145/ /pubmed/22505798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/345068 Text en Copyright © 2012 Svjetlana Lozo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Lozo, Svjetlana
Ahmed, Ahmed
Chapnick, Edward
O'Keefe, Mary
Minkoff, Howard
Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications
title Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications
title_full Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications
title_fullStr Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications
title_full_unstemmed Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications
title_short Presumed Cases of Mumps in Pregnancy: Clinical and Infection Control Implications
title_sort presumed cases of mumps in pregnancy: clinical and infection control implications
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/345068
work_keys_str_mv AT lozosvjetlana presumedcasesofmumpsinpregnancyclinicalandinfectioncontrolimplications
AT ahmedahmed presumedcasesofmumpsinpregnancyclinicalandinfectioncontrolimplications
AT chapnickedward presumedcasesofmumpsinpregnancyclinicalandinfectioncontrolimplications
AT okeefemary presumedcasesofmumpsinpregnancyclinicalandinfectioncontrolimplications
AT minkoffhoward presumedcasesofmumpsinpregnancyclinicalandinfectioncontrolimplications