Cargando…

Estimating the Distribution of Selection Coefficients from Phylogenetic Data Using Sitewise Mutation-Selection Models

Estimation of the distribution of selection coefficients of mutations is a long-standing issue in molecular evolution. In addition to population-based methods, the distribution can be estimated from DNA sequence data by phylogenetic-based models. Previous models have generally found unimodal distrib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tamuri, Asif U., dos Reis, Mario, Goldstein, Richard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22209901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.136432
_version_ 1782225696760791040
author Tamuri, Asif U.
dos Reis, Mario
Goldstein, Richard A.
author_facet Tamuri, Asif U.
dos Reis, Mario
Goldstein, Richard A.
author_sort Tamuri, Asif U.
collection PubMed
description Estimation of the distribution of selection coefficients of mutations is a long-standing issue in molecular evolution. In addition to population-based methods, the distribution can be estimated from DNA sequence data by phylogenetic-based models. Previous models have generally found unimodal distributions where the probability mass is concentrated between mildly deleterious and nearly neutral mutations. Here we use a sitewise mutation–selection phylogenetic model to estimate the distribution of selection coefficients among novel and fixed mutations (substitutions) in a data set of 244 mammalian mitochondrial genomes and a set of 401 PB2 proteins from influenza. We find a bimodal distribution of selection coefficients for novel mutations in both the mitochondrial data set and for the influenza protein evolving in its natural reservoir, birds. Most of the mutations are strongly deleterious with the rest of the probability mass concentrated around mildly deleterious to neutral mutations. The distribution of the coefficients among substitutions is unimodal and symmetrical around nearly neutral substitutions for both data sets at adaptive equilibrium. About 0.5% of the nonsynonymous mutations and 14% of the nonsynonymous substitutions in the mitochondrial proteins are advantageous, with 0.5% and 24% observed for the influenza protein. Following a host shift of influenza from birds to humans, however, we find among novel mutations in PB2 a trimodal distribution with a small mode of advantageous mutations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3296245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32962452012-03-20 Estimating the Distribution of Selection Coefficients from Phylogenetic Data Using Sitewise Mutation-Selection Models Tamuri, Asif U. dos Reis, Mario Goldstein, Richard A. Genetics Investigations Estimation of the distribution of selection coefficients of mutations is a long-standing issue in molecular evolution. In addition to population-based methods, the distribution can be estimated from DNA sequence data by phylogenetic-based models. Previous models have generally found unimodal distributions where the probability mass is concentrated between mildly deleterious and nearly neutral mutations. Here we use a sitewise mutation–selection phylogenetic model to estimate the distribution of selection coefficients among novel and fixed mutations (substitutions) in a data set of 244 mammalian mitochondrial genomes and a set of 401 PB2 proteins from influenza. We find a bimodal distribution of selection coefficients for novel mutations in both the mitochondrial data set and for the influenza protein evolving in its natural reservoir, birds. Most of the mutations are strongly deleterious with the rest of the probability mass concentrated around mildly deleterious to neutral mutations. The distribution of the coefficients among substitutions is unimodal and symmetrical around nearly neutral substitutions for both data sets at adaptive equilibrium. About 0.5% of the nonsynonymous mutations and 14% of the nonsynonymous substitutions in the mitochondrial proteins are advantageous, with 0.5% and 24% observed for the influenza protein. Following a host shift of influenza from birds to humans, however, we find among novel mutations in PB2 a trimodal distribution with a small mode of advantageous mutations. Genetics Society of America 2012-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3296245/ /pubmed/22209901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.136432 Text en Copyright © 2012 by the Genetics Society of America Available freely online through the author-supported open access option.
spellingShingle Investigations
Tamuri, Asif U.
dos Reis, Mario
Goldstein, Richard A.
Estimating the Distribution of Selection Coefficients from Phylogenetic Data Using Sitewise Mutation-Selection Models
title Estimating the Distribution of Selection Coefficients from Phylogenetic Data Using Sitewise Mutation-Selection Models
title_full Estimating the Distribution of Selection Coefficients from Phylogenetic Data Using Sitewise Mutation-Selection Models
title_fullStr Estimating the Distribution of Selection Coefficients from Phylogenetic Data Using Sitewise Mutation-Selection Models
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the Distribution of Selection Coefficients from Phylogenetic Data Using Sitewise Mutation-Selection Models
title_short Estimating the Distribution of Selection Coefficients from Phylogenetic Data Using Sitewise Mutation-Selection Models
title_sort estimating the distribution of selection coefficients from phylogenetic data using sitewise mutation-selection models
topic Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22209901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.136432
work_keys_str_mv AT tamuriasifu estimatingthedistributionofselectioncoefficientsfromphylogeneticdatausingsitewisemutationselectionmodels
AT dosreismario estimatingthedistributionofselectioncoefficientsfromphylogeneticdatausingsitewisemutationselectionmodels
AT goldsteinricharda estimatingthedistributionofselectioncoefficientsfromphylogeneticdatausingsitewisemutationselectionmodels