Cargando…

Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer has been compared with open colectomy in randomized controlled trials, but these studies may not be generalizable because of strict enrollment and exclusion criteria which may explicitly or inadvertently exclude older individuals due to associated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cummings, Linda C, Delaney, Conor P, Cooper, Gregory S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22313593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-31
_version_ 1782225754471268352
author Cummings, Linda C
Delaney, Conor P
Cooper, Gregory S
author_facet Cummings, Linda C
Delaney, Conor P
Cooper, Gregory S
author_sort Cummings, Linda C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer has been compared with open colectomy in randomized controlled trials, but these studies may not be generalizable because of strict enrollment and exclusion criteria which may explicitly or inadvertently exclude older individuals due to associated comorbidities. Previous studies of older patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy have generally focused on short-term outcomes. The goals of this cohort study were to identify predictors of laparoscopic colectomy in an older population in the United States and to compare short-term and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients aged 65 years or older with incident colorectal cancer diagnosed 1996-2002 who underwent colectomy within 6 months of cancer diagnosis were identified from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Laparoscopic and open colectomy patients were compared with respect to length of stay, blood transfusion requirements, intensive care unit monitoring, complications, 30-day mortality, and long-term survival. We adjusted for potential selection bias in surgical approach with propensity score matching. RESULTS: Laparoscopic colectomy cases were associated with left-sided tumors; areas with higher population density, income, and education level; areas in the western United States; and National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. Laparoscopic colectomy cases had shorter length of stay and less intensive care unit monitoring. Although laparoscopic colectomy patients (n = 424) had fewer complications (21.5% versus 26.3%), lower 30-day mortality (3.3% versus 5.8%), and longer median survival (6.6 versus 4.8 years) compared with open colectomy patients (n = 27,012), after propensity score matching these differences disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: In this older population, laparoscopic colectomy practice patterns were associated with factors which likely correlate with tertiary referral centers. Although short-term and long-term survival are comparable, laparoscopic colectomy offers shorter hospitalizations and less intensive care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3296595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32965952012-03-08 Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study Cummings, Linda C Delaney, Conor P Cooper, Gregory S World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer has been compared with open colectomy in randomized controlled trials, but these studies may not be generalizable because of strict enrollment and exclusion criteria which may explicitly or inadvertently exclude older individuals due to associated comorbidities. Previous studies of older patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy have generally focused on short-term outcomes. The goals of this cohort study were to identify predictors of laparoscopic colectomy in an older population in the United States and to compare short-term and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients aged 65 years or older with incident colorectal cancer diagnosed 1996-2002 who underwent colectomy within 6 months of cancer diagnosis were identified from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Laparoscopic and open colectomy patients were compared with respect to length of stay, blood transfusion requirements, intensive care unit monitoring, complications, 30-day mortality, and long-term survival. We adjusted for potential selection bias in surgical approach with propensity score matching. RESULTS: Laparoscopic colectomy cases were associated with left-sided tumors; areas with higher population density, income, and education level; areas in the western United States; and National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. Laparoscopic colectomy cases had shorter length of stay and less intensive care unit monitoring. Although laparoscopic colectomy patients (n = 424) had fewer complications (21.5% versus 26.3%), lower 30-day mortality (3.3% versus 5.8%), and longer median survival (6.6 versus 4.8 years) compared with open colectomy patients (n = 27,012), after propensity score matching these differences disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: In this older population, laparoscopic colectomy practice patterns were associated with factors which likely correlate with tertiary referral centers. Although short-term and long-term survival are comparable, laparoscopic colectomy offers shorter hospitalizations and less intensive care. BioMed Central 2012-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3296595/ /pubmed/22313593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-31 Text en Copyright ©2012 Cummings et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Cummings, Linda C
Delaney, Conor P
Cooper, Gregory S
Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study
title Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study
title_full Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study
title_fullStr Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study
title_short Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study
title_sort laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22313593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-31
work_keys_str_mv AT cummingslindac laparoscopicversusopencolectomyforcoloncancerinanolderpopulationacohortstudy
AT delaneyconorp laparoscopicversusopencolectomyforcoloncancerinanolderpopulationacohortstudy
AT coopergregorys laparoscopicversusopencolectomyforcoloncancerinanolderpopulationacohortstudy