Cargando…

A comparative study of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis in experimentally infected pigs

BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium (Maa) and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis (Mah) are opportunistic pathogens that may infect several species, including humans and pigs. Mah is however more frequently isolated from pigs than Maa, and it is unclear if this is due to difference in vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agdestein, Angelika, Johansen, Tone B, Kolbjørnsen, Øyvor, Jørgensen, Anne, Djønne, Berit, Olsen, Ingrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22284630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-11
_version_ 1782225756302082048
author Agdestein, Angelika
Johansen, Tone B
Kolbjørnsen, Øyvor
Jørgensen, Anne
Djønne, Berit
Olsen, Ingrid
author_facet Agdestein, Angelika
Johansen, Tone B
Kolbjørnsen, Øyvor
Jørgensen, Anne
Djønne, Berit
Olsen, Ingrid
author_sort Agdestein, Angelika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium (Maa) and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis (Mah) are opportunistic pathogens that may infect several species, including humans and pigs. Mah is however more frequently isolated from pigs than Maa, and it is unclear if this is due to difference in virulence or in exposure to the two organisms. Clinical isolates of each subspecies were administered perorally to ten domestic pigs, respectively. The animals were sacrificed at six and 12 weeks after inoculation. At necropsy, macroscopic lesions were recorded, and tissue samples were collected for mycobacterial culture, IS1245 real time PCR and histopathological examination. Culturing was also performed on faecal samples collected at necropsy. RESULTS: Macroscopic and histopathological lesions were detected in pigs infected with each subspecies, and bacterial growth and histopathological changes were demonstrated, also in samples from organs without gross pathological lesions. Six weeks after inoculation, live Mah was detected in faeces, as opposed to Maa. The presence of live mycobacteria was also more pronounced in Mah infected tonsils. In comparison, the Maa isolate appeared to have a higher ability of intracellular replication in porcine macrophages compared to the Mah isolate. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that both subspecies were able to infect pigs. Additionally, the more extensive shedding of Mah might cause pig-to-pig transmission and contribute to the higher incidence of infection caused by this subspecies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3296603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32966032012-03-08 A comparative study of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis in experimentally infected pigs Agdestein, Angelika Johansen, Tone B Kolbjørnsen, Øyvor Jørgensen, Anne Djønne, Berit Olsen, Ingrid BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium (Maa) and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis (Mah) are opportunistic pathogens that may infect several species, including humans and pigs. Mah is however more frequently isolated from pigs than Maa, and it is unclear if this is due to difference in virulence or in exposure to the two organisms. Clinical isolates of each subspecies were administered perorally to ten domestic pigs, respectively. The animals were sacrificed at six and 12 weeks after inoculation. At necropsy, macroscopic lesions were recorded, and tissue samples were collected for mycobacterial culture, IS1245 real time PCR and histopathological examination. Culturing was also performed on faecal samples collected at necropsy. RESULTS: Macroscopic and histopathological lesions were detected in pigs infected with each subspecies, and bacterial growth and histopathological changes were demonstrated, also in samples from organs without gross pathological lesions. Six weeks after inoculation, live Mah was detected in faeces, as opposed to Maa. The presence of live mycobacteria was also more pronounced in Mah infected tonsils. In comparison, the Maa isolate appeared to have a higher ability of intracellular replication in porcine macrophages compared to the Mah isolate. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that both subspecies were able to infect pigs. Additionally, the more extensive shedding of Mah might cause pig-to-pig transmission and contribute to the higher incidence of infection caused by this subspecies. BioMed Central 2012-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3296603/ /pubmed/22284630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-11 Text en Copyright ©2012 Agdestein et al; BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Agdestein, Angelika
Johansen, Tone B
Kolbjørnsen, Øyvor
Jørgensen, Anne
Djønne, Berit
Olsen, Ingrid
A comparative study of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis in experimentally infected pigs
title A comparative study of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis in experimentally infected pigs
title_full A comparative study of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis in experimentally infected pigs
title_fullStr A comparative study of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis in experimentally infected pigs
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis in experimentally infected pigs
title_short A comparative study of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis in experimentally infected pigs
title_sort comparative study of mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis in experimentally infected pigs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22284630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-11
work_keys_str_mv AT agdesteinangelika acomparativestudyofmycobacteriumaviumsubspaviumandmycobacteriumaviumsubsphominissuisinexperimentallyinfectedpigs
AT johansentoneb acomparativestudyofmycobacteriumaviumsubspaviumandmycobacteriumaviumsubsphominissuisinexperimentallyinfectedpigs
AT kolbjørnsenøyvor acomparativestudyofmycobacteriumaviumsubspaviumandmycobacteriumaviumsubsphominissuisinexperimentallyinfectedpigs
AT jørgensenanne acomparativestudyofmycobacteriumaviumsubspaviumandmycobacteriumaviumsubsphominissuisinexperimentallyinfectedpigs
AT djønneberit acomparativestudyofmycobacteriumaviumsubspaviumandmycobacteriumaviumsubsphominissuisinexperimentallyinfectedpigs
AT olseningrid acomparativestudyofmycobacteriumaviumsubspaviumandmycobacteriumaviumsubsphominissuisinexperimentallyinfectedpigs
AT agdesteinangelika comparativestudyofmycobacteriumaviumsubspaviumandmycobacteriumaviumsubsphominissuisinexperimentallyinfectedpigs
AT johansentoneb comparativestudyofmycobacteriumaviumsubspaviumandmycobacteriumaviumsubsphominissuisinexperimentallyinfectedpigs
AT kolbjørnsenøyvor comparativestudyofmycobacteriumaviumsubspaviumandmycobacteriumaviumsubsphominissuisinexperimentallyinfectedpigs
AT jørgensenanne comparativestudyofmycobacteriumaviumsubspaviumandmycobacteriumaviumsubsphominissuisinexperimentallyinfectedpigs
AT djønneberit comparativestudyofmycobacteriumaviumsubspaviumandmycobacteriumaviumsubsphominissuisinexperimentallyinfectedpigs
AT olseningrid comparativestudyofmycobacteriumaviumsubspaviumandmycobacteriumaviumsubsphominissuisinexperimentallyinfectedpigs