Cargando…
Delorme's Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Does It Still Have It's Own Role?
PURPOSE: Although there are more than a hundred techniques, including the transabdominal and the perineal approaches, for the repair of the rectal prolapsed, none of them is perfect. The best repair should be chosen not only to correct the prolapse but also to restore defecatory function and to impr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Coloproctology
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22413077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.13 |
_version_ | 1782225806281408512 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Sooho Kye, Bong-Hyeon Kim, Hyung-Jin Cho, Hyeon-Min Kim, Jun-Gi |
author_facet | Lee, Sooho Kye, Bong-Hyeon Kim, Hyung-Jin Cho, Hyeon-Min Kim, Jun-Gi |
author_sort | Lee, Sooho |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Although there are more than a hundred techniques, including the transabdominal and the perineal approaches, for the repair of the rectal prolapsed, none of them is perfect. The best repair should be chosen not only to correct the prolapse but also to restore defecatory function and to improve fecal incontinence throughout the patient's lifetime. The aim of this retrospective review is to evaluate clinical outcomes of the Delorme's procedure for the management of the complete rectal prolapse. METHODS: A total of 19 patients (13 females and 6 males) with complete rectal prolapses were treated by using the Delorme's procedure in St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, from February 1997 to February 2007. Postoperative anal incontinence was evaluated using the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score. RESULTS: All 19 patients had incontinence to liquid stool, solid stool, and/or flatus preoperatively. Three (15.8%) patients reported recurrence of the rectal prolapse (at 6, 18, 29 months, respectively, after the operation). Information on postoperative incontinence was available for 16 of the 19 patients. Twelve of the 16 patients (75%) reported improved continence (5 [31.3%] were improved and 7 [43.7%] completely recovered from incontinence) while 4 patients had unchanged incontinence symptoms. One (6.3%) patient who did not have constipation preoperatively developed constipation after the operation. CONCLUSION: The Delorme's procedure is associated with a marked improvement in anal continence, relatively low recurrence rates, and low incidence of postoperative constipation. This allows us to conclude that this procedure still has its own role in selected patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3296936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Coloproctology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32969362012-03-12 Delorme's Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Does It Still Have It's Own Role? Lee, Sooho Kye, Bong-Hyeon Kim, Hyung-Jin Cho, Hyeon-Min Kim, Jun-Gi J Korean Soc Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Although there are more than a hundred techniques, including the transabdominal and the perineal approaches, for the repair of the rectal prolapsed, none of them is perfect. The best repair should be chosen not only to correct the prolapse but also to restore defecatory function and to improve fecal incontinence throughout the patient's lifetime. The aim of this retrospective review is to evaluate clinical outcomes of the Delorme's procedure for the management of the complete rectal prolapse. METHODS: A total of 19 patients (13 females and 6 males) with complete rectal prolapses were treated by using the Delorme's procedure in St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, from February 1997 to February 2007. Postoperative anal incontinence was evaluated using the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score. RESULTS: All 19 patients had incontinence to liquid stool, solid stool, and/or flatus preoperatively. Three (15.8%) patients reported recurrence of the rectal prolapse (at 6, 18, 29 months, respectively, after the operation). Information on postoperative incontinence was available for 16 of the 19 patients. Twelve of the 16 patients (75%) reported improved continence (5 [31.3%] were improved and 7 [43.7%] completely recovered from incontinence) while 4 patients had unchanged incontinence symptoms. One (6.3%) patient who did not have constipation preoperatively developed constipation after the operation. CONCLUSION: The Delorme's procedure is associated with a marked improvement in anal continence, relatively low recurrence rates, and low incidence of postoperative constipation. This allows us to conclude that this procedure still has its own role in selected patients. The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2012-02 2012-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3296936/ /pubmed/22413077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.13 Text en © 2012 The Korean Society of Coloproctology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Sooho Kye, Bong-Hyeon Kim, Hyung-Jin Cho, Hyeon-Min Kim, Jun-Gi Delorme's Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Does It Still Have It's Own Role? |
title | Delorme's Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Does It Still Have It's Own Role? |
title_full | Delorme's Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Does It Still Have It's Own Role? |
title_fullStr | Delorme's Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Does It Still Have It's Own Role? |
title_full_unstemmed | Delorme's Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Does It Still Have It's Own Role? |
title_short | Delorme's Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Does It Still Have It's Own Role? |
title_sort | delorme's procedure for complete rectal prolapse: does it still have it's own role? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22413077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesooho delormesprocedureforcompleterectalprolapsedoesitstillhaveitsownrole AT kyebonghyeon delormesprocedureforcompleterectalprolapsedoesitstillhaveitsownrole AT kimhyungjin delormesprocedureforcompleterectalprolapsedoesitstillhaveitsownrole AT chohyeonmin delormesprocedureforcompleterectalprolapsedoesitstillhaveitsownrole AT kimjungi delormesprocedureforcompleterectalprolapsedoesitstillhaveitsownrole |