Cargando…

Blood Pressure Reactivity to an Anger Provocation Interview Does Not Predict Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events: The Canadian Nova Scotia Health Survey (NSHS95) Prospective Population Study

We examined the association between blood pressure (BP) reactivity to an anger provocation interview and 10-year incident CVD events in 1,470 adults from the population-based 1995 Nova Scotia Health Survey (NSHS95). In an unadjusted model, those in the highest decile of systolic BP reactivity were m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaffer, Jonathan A., Wasson, Lauren Taggart, Davidson, Karina W., Schwartz, Joseph E., Kirkland, Susan, Shimbo, Daichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22518289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/658128
_version_ 1782225810615173120
author Shaffer, Jonathan A.
Wasson, Lauren Taggart
Davidson, Karina W.
Schwartz, Joseph E.
Kirkland, Susan
Shimbo, Daichi
author_facet Shaffer, Jonathan A.
Wasson, Lauren Taggart
Davidson, Karina W.
Schwartz, Joseph E.
Kirkland, Susan
Shimbo, Daichi
author_sort Shaffer, Jonathan A.
collection PubMed
description We examined the association between blood pressure (BP) reactivity to an anger provocation interview and 10-year incident CVD events in 1,470 adults from the population-based 1995 Nova Scotia Health Survey (NSHS95). In an unadjusted model, those in the highest decile of systolic BP reactivity were more than twice as likely to have an incident CVD event compared to those in the decile with no reactivity (HR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.15 – 4.69, P = 0.02). However, after adjusting for age and sex, and then also for Framingham risk score, body mass index, and education, this relationship was attenuated and not statistically significant. Diastolic BP reactivity was not associated with CVD incidence in any model. Individual differences in BP reactivity to a laboratory-induced, structured anger provocation interview may not play a major role in clinical CVD endpoints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3296956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32969562012-04-19 Blood Pressure Reactivity to an Anger Provocation Interview Does Not Predict Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events: The Canadian Nova Scotia Health Survey (NSHS95) Prospective Population Study Shaffer, Jonathan A. Wasson, Lauren Taggart Davidson, Karina W. Schwartz, Joseph E. Kirkland, Susan Shimbo, Daichi Int J Hypertens Research Article We examined the association between blood pressure (BP) reactivity to an anger provocation interview and 10-year incident CVD events in 1,470 adults from the population-based 1995 Nova Scotia Health Survey (NSHS95). In an unadjusted model, those in the highest decile of systolic BP reactivity were more than twice as likely to have an incident CVD event compared to those in the decile with no reactivity (HR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.15 – 4.69, P = 0.02). However, after adjusting for age and sex, and then also for Framingham risk score, body mass index, and education, this relationship was attenuated and not statistically significant. Diastolic BP reactivity was not associated with CVD incidence in any model. Individual differences in BP reactivity to a laboratory-induced, structured anger provocation interview may not play a major role in clinical CVD endpoints. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3296956/ /pubmed/22518289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/658128 Text en Copyright © 2012 Jonathan A. Shaffer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shaffer, Jonathan A.
Wasson, Lauren Taggart
Davidson, Karina W.
Schwartz, Joseph E.
Kirkland, Susan
Shimbo, Daichi
Blood Pressure Reactivity to an Anger Provocation Interview Does Not Predict Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events: The Canadian Nova Scotia Health Survey (NSHS95) Prospective Population Study
title Blood Pressure Reactivity to an Anger Provocation Interview Does Not Predict Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events: The Canadian Nova Scotia Health Survey (NSHS95) Prospective Population Study
title_full Blood Pressure Reactivity to an Anger Provocation Interview Does Not Predict Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events: The Canadian Nova Scotia Health Survey (NSHS95) Prospective Population Study
title_fullStr Blood Pressure Reactivity to an Anger Provocation Interview Does Not Predict Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events: The Canadian Nova Scotia Health Survey (NSHS95) Prospective Population Study
title_full_unstemmed Blood Pressure Reactivity to an Anger Provocation Interview Does Not Predict Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events: The Canadian Nova Scotia Health Survey (NSHS95) Prospective Population Study
title_short Blood Pressure Reactivity to an Anger Provocation Interview Does Not Predict Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events: The Canadian Nova Scotia Health Survey (NSHS95) Prospective Population Study
title_sort blood pressure reactivity to an anger provocation interview does not predict incident cardiovascular disease events: the canadian nova scotia health survey (nshs95) prospective population study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22518289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/658128
work_keys_str_mv AT shafferjonathana bloodpressurereactivitytoanangerprovocationinterviewdoesnotpredictincidentcardiovasculardiseaseeventsthecanadiannovascotiahealthsurveynshs95prospectivepopulationstudy
AT wassonlaurentaggart bloodpressurereactivitytoanangerprovocationinterviewdoesnotpredictincidentcardiovasculardiseaseeventsthecanadiannovascotiahealthsurveynshs95prospectivepopulationstudy
AT davidsonkarinaw bloodpressurereactivitytoanangerprovocationinterviewdoesnotpredictincidentcardiovasculardiseaseeventsthecanadiannovascotiahealthsurveynshs95prospectivepopulationstudy
AT schwartzjosephe bloodpressurereactivitytoanangerprovocationinterviewdoesnotpredictincidentcardiovasculardiseaseeventsthecanadiannovascotiahealthsurveynshs95prospectivepopulationstudy
AT kirklandsusan bloodpressurereactivitytoanangerprovocationinterviewdoesnotpredictincidentcardiovasculardiseaseeventsthecanadiannovascotiahealthsurveynshs95prospectivepopulationstudy
AT shimbodaichi bloodpressurereactivitytoanangerprovocationinterviewdoesnotpredictincidentcardiovasculardiseaseeventsthecanadiannovascotiahealthsurveynshs95prospectivepopulationstudy