Cargando…

Public health research outputs from efficacy to dissemination: a bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND: More intervention research is needed, particularly 'real world' intervention replication and dissemination studies, to optimize improvements in health. This study assessed the proportion and type of published public health intervention research papers over time in physical acti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milat, Andrew J, Bauman, Adrian E, Redman, Sally, Curac, Nada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3297537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22168312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-934
_version_ 1782225883402076160
author Milat, Andrew J
Bauman, Adrian E
Redman, Sally
Curac, Nada
author_facet Milat, Andrew J
Bauman, Adrian E
Redman, Sally
Curac, Nada
author_sort Milat, Andrew J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: More intervention research is needed, particularly 'real world' intervention replication and dissemination studies, to optimize improvements in health. This study assessed the proportion and type of published public health intervention research papers over time in physical activity and falls prevention, both important contributors to preventable morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A keyword search was conducted, using Medline and PsycINFO to locate publications in 1988-1989, 1998-1999, and 2008-2009 for the two topic areas. In stage 1, a random sample of 1200 publications per time period for both topics were categorized as: non-public health, non-data-based public health, or data-based public health. In stage 2 data-based public health articles were further classified as measurement, descriptive, etiological or intervention research. Finally, intervention papers were categorized as: efficacy, intervention replication or dissemination studies. Inter-rater reliability of paper classification was 88%. RESULTS: Descriptive studies were the most common data-based papers across all time periods (1988-89; 1998-1999;2008-2009) for both issues (physical activity: 47%; 54%; 65% and falls 75%; 64%; 63%), increasing significantly over time for physical activity. The proportion of intervention publications did not increase over time for physical activity comprising 23% across all time periods and fluctuated for falls across the time periods (10%; 21%; 17%). The proportion of intervention articles that were replication studies increased over the three time periods for physical activity (0%; 2%; 11%) and for falls (0%; 22%; 35%). Dissemination studies first appeared in the literature in 2008-2009, making up only 3% of physical activity and 7% of falls intervention studies. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention research studies remain only a modest proportion of all published studies in physical activity and falls prevention; the majority of the intervention studies, are efficacy studies although there is growing evidence of a move towards replication and dissemination studies, which may have greater potential for improving population health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3297537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32975372012-03-09 Public health research outputs from efficacy to dissemination: a bibliometric analysis Milat, Andrew J Bauman, Adrian E Redman, Sally Curac, Nada BMC Public Health Correspondence BACKGROUND: More intervention research is needed, particularly 'real world' intervention replication and dissemination studies, to optimize improvements in health. This study assessed the proportion and type of published public health intervention research papers over time in physical activity and falls prevention, both important contributors to preventable morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A keyword search was conducted, using Medline and PsycINFO to locate publications in 1988-1989, 1998-1999, and 2008-2009 for the two topic areas. In stage 1, a random sample of 1200 publications per time period for both topics were categorized as: non-public health, non-data-based public health, or data-based public health. In stage 2 data-based public health articles were further classified as measurement, descriptive, etiological or intervention research. Finally, intervention papers were categorized as: efficacy, intervention replication or dissemination studies. Inter-rater reliability of paper classification was 88%. RESULTS: Descriptive studies were the most common data-based papers across all time periods (1988-89; 1998-1999;2008-2009) for both issues (physical activity: 47%; 54%; 65% and falls 75%; 64%; 63%), increasing significantly over time for physical activity. The proportion of intervention publications did not increase over time for physical activity comprising 23% across all time periods and fluctuated for falls across the time periods (10%; 21%; 17%). The proportion of intervention articles that were replication studies increased over the three time periods for physical activity (0%; 2%; 11%) and for falls (0%; 22%; 35%). Dissemination studies first appeared in the literature in 2008-2009, making up only 3% of physical activity and 7% of falls intervention studies. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention research studies remain only a modest proportion of all published studies in physical activity and falls prevention; the majority of the intervention studies, are efficacy studies although there is growing evidence of a move towards replication and dissemination studies, which may have greater potential for improving population health. BioMed Central 2011-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3297537/ /pubmed/22168312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-934 Text en Copyright ©2011 Milat et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Milat, Andrew J
Bauman, Adrian E
Redman, Sally
Curac, Nada
Public health research outputs from efficacy to dissemination: a bibliometric analysis
title Public health research outputs from efficacy to dissemination: a bibliometric analysis
title_full Public health research outputs from efficacy to dissemination: a bibliometric analysis
title_fullStr Public health research outputs from efficacy to dissemination: a bibliometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Public health research outputs from efficacy to dissemination: a bibliometric analysis
title_short Public health research outputs from efficacy to dissemination: a bibliometric analysis
title_sort public health research outputs from efficacy to dissemination: a bibliometric analysis
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3297537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22168312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-934
work_keys_str_mv AT milatandrewj publichealthresearchoutputsfromefficacytodisseminationabibliometricanalysis
AT baumanadriane publichealthresearchoutputsfromefficacytodisseminationabibliometricanalysis
AT redmansally publichealthresearchoutputsfromefficacytodisseminationabibliometricanalysis
AT curacnada publichealthresearchoutputsfromefficacytodisseminationabibliometricanalysis