Cargando…

Psychiatric Evaluation of the Agitated Patient: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA Psychiatric Evaluation Workgroup

It is difficult to fully assess an agitated patient, and the complete psychiatric evaluation usually cannot be completed until the patient is calm enough to participate in a psychiatric interview. Nonetheless, emergency clinicians must perform an initial mental status screening to begin this process...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stowell, Keith R, Florence, Peter, Harman, Herbert J, Glick, Rachel L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3298217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22461916
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6868
_version_ 1782225959261306880
author Stowell, Keith R
Florence, Peter
Harman, Herbert J
Glick, Rachel L
author_facet Stowell, Keith R
Florence, Peter
Harman, Herbert J
Glick, Rachel L
author_sort Stowell, Keith R
collection PubMed
description It is difficult to fully assess an agitated patient, and the complete psychiatric evaluation usually cannot be completed until the patient is calm enough to participate in a psychiatric interview. Nonetheless, emergency clinicians must perform an initial mental status screening to begin this process as soon as the agitated patient presents to an emergency setting. For this reason, the psychiatric evaluation of the agitated patient can be thought of as a 2-step process. First, a brief evaluation must be aimed at determining the most likely cause of agitation, so as to guide preliminary interventions to calm the patient. Once the patient is calmed, more extensive psychiatric assessment can be completed. The goal of the emergency assessment of the psychiatric patient is not necessarily to obtain a definitive diagnosis. Rather, ascertaining a differential diagnosis, determining safety, and developing an appropriate treatment and disposition plan are the goals of the assessment. This article will summarize what components of the psychiatric assessment can and should be done at the time the agitated patient presents to the emergency setting. The complete psychiatric evaluation of the patient whose agitation has been treated successfully is beyond the scope of this article and Project BETA (Best practices in Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation), but will be outlined briefly to give the reader an understanding of what a full psychiatric assessment would entail. Other issues related to the assessment of the agitated patient in the emergency setting will also be discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3298217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32982172012-03-29 Psychiatric Evaluation of the Agitated Patient: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA Psychiatric Evaluation Workgroup Stowell, Keith R Florence, Peter Harman, Herbert J Glick, Rachel L West J Emerg Med Behavioral Emergencies: Best Practices in Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation It is difficult to fully assess an agitated patient, and the complete psychiatric evaluation usually cannot be completed until the patient is calm enough to participate in a psychiatric interview. Nonetheless, emergency clinicians must perform an initial mental status screening to begin this process as soon as the agitated patient presents to an emergency setting. For this reason, the psychiatric evaluation of the agitated patient can be thought of as a 2-step process. First, a brief evaluation must be aimed at determining the most likely cause of agitation, so as to guide preliminary interventions to calm the patient. Once the patient is calmed, more extensive psychiatric assessment can be completed. The goal of the emergency assessment of the psychiatric patient is not necessarily to obtain a definitive diagnosis. Rather, ascertaining a differential diagnosis, determining safety, and developing an appropriate treatment and disposition plan are the goals of the assessment. This article will summarize what components of the psychiatric assessment can and should be done at the time the agitated patient presents to the emergency setting. The complete psychiatric evaluation of the patient whose agitation has been treated successfully is beyond the scope of this article and Project BETA (Best practices in Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation), but will be outlined briefly to give the reader an understanding of what a full psychiatric assessment would entail. Other issues related to the assessment of the agitated patient in the emergency setting will also be discussed. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2012-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3298217/ /pubmed/22461916 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6868 Text en the authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Behavioral Emergencies: Best Practices in Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation
Stowell, Keith R
Florence, Peter
Harman, Herbert J
Glick, Rachel L
Psychiatric Evaluation of the Agitated Patient: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA Psychiatric Evaluation Workgroup
title Psychiatric Evaluation of the Agitated Patient: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA Psychiatric Evaluation Workgroup
title_full Psychiatric Evaluation of the Agitated Patient: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA Psychiatric Evaluation Workgroup
title_fullStr Psychiatric Evaluation of the Agitated Patient: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA Psychiatric Evaluation Workgroup
title_full_unstemmed Psychiatric Evaluation of the Agitated Patient: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA Psychiatric Evaluation Workgroup
title_short Psychiatric Evaluation of the Agitated Patient: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA Psychiatric Evaluation Workgroup
title_sort psychiatric evaluation of the agitated patient: consensus statement of the american association for emergency psychiatry project beta psychiatric evaluation workgroup
topic Behavioral Emergencies: Best Practices in Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3298217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22461916
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6868
work_keys_str_mv AT stowellkeithr psychiatricevaluationoftheagitatedpatientconsensusstatementoftheamericanassociationforemergencypsychiatryprojectbetapsychiatricevaluationworkgroup
AT florencepeter psychiatricevaluationoftheagitatedpatientconsensusstatementoftheamericanassociationforemergencypsychiatryprojectbetapsychiatricevaluationworkgroup
AT harmanherbertj psychiatricevaluationoftheagitatedpatientconsensusstatementoftheamericanassociationforemergencypsychiatryprojectbetapsychiatricevaluationworkgroup
AT glickrachell psychiatricevaluationoftheagitatedpatientconsensusstatementoftheamericanassociationforemergencypsychiatryprojectbetapsychiatricevaluationworkgroup