Cargando…
Seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii in dogs in North America
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the exposure of dogs to three different Ehrlichia spp. in the south and central regions of the United States where vector-borne disease prevalence has been previously difficult to ascertain, particularly beyond the metropolitan areas. METHODS: Dog blood samples (n =...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3298699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22316160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-29 |
_version_ | 1782226026343956480 |
---|---|
author | Beall, Melissa J Alleman, A Rick Breitschwerdt, Ed B Cohn, Leah A Couto, C Guillermo Dryden, Michael W Guptill, Lynn C Iazbik, Cristina Kania, Stephen A Lathan, Patty Little, Susan E Roy, Alma Sayler, Katherine A Stillman, Brett A Welles, Elizabeth G Wolfson, Wendy Yabsley, Michael J |
author_facet | Beall, Melissa J Alleman, A Rick Breitschwerdt, Ed B Cohn, Leah A Couto, C Guillermo Dryden, Michael W Guptill, Lynn C Iazbik, Cristina Kania, Stephen A Lathan, Patty Little, Susan E Roy, Alma Sayler, Katherine A Stillman, Brett A Welles, Elizabeth G Wolfson, Wendy Yabsley, Michael J |
author_sort | Beall, Melissa J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the exposure of dogs to three different Ehrlichia spp. in the south and central regions of the United States where vector-borne disease prevalence has been previously difficult to ascertain, particularly beyond the metropolitan areas. METHODS: Dog blood samples (n = 8,662) were submitted from 14 veterinary colleges, 6 private veterinary practices and 4 diagnostic laboratories across this region. Samples were tested for E. canis, E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii specific antibodies using peptide microtiter ELISAs. RESULTS: Overall, E. canis, E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii seroprevalence was 0.8%, 2.8%, and 5.1%, respectively. The highest E. canis seroprevalence (2.3%) was found in a region encompassing Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas. E. chaffeensis seroreactivity was 6.6% in the central region (Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma) and 4.6% in the southeast region (Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia). Seroreactivity to E. ewingii was also highest in the central region (14.6%) followed by the southeast region (5.9%). The geospatial pattern derived from E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii seropositive samples was similar to previous reports based on E. chaffeensis seroreactivity in white-tailed deer and the distribution of human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) cases reported by the CDC. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide the first large scale regional documentation of exposure to E. canis, E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii in pet dogs, highlighting regional differences in seroprevalence and providing the basis for heightened awareness of these emerging vector-borne pathogens by veterinarians and public health agencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3298699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32986992012-03-11 Seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii in dogs in North America Beall, Melissa J Alleman, A Rick Breitschwerdt, Ed B Cohn, Leah A Couto, C Guillermo Dryden, Michael W Guptill, Lynn C Iazbik, Cristina Kania, Stephen A Lathan, Patty Little, Susan E Roy, Alma Sayler, Katherine A Stillman, Brett A Welles, Elizabeth G Wolfson, Wendy Yabsley, Michael J Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the exposure of dogs to three different Ehrlichia spp. in the south and central regions of the United States where vector-borne disease prevalence has been previously difficult to ascertain, particularly beyond the metropolitan areas. METHODS: Dog blood samples (n = 8,662) were submitted from 14 veterinary colleges, 6 private veterinary practices and 4 diagnostic laboratories across this region. Samples were tested for E. canis, E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii specific antibodies using peptide microtiter ELISAs. RESULTS: Overall, E. canis, E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii seroprevalence was 0.8%, 2.8%, and 5.1%, respectively. The highest E. canis seroprevalence (2.3%) was found in a region encompassing Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas. E. chaffeensis seroreactivity was 6.6% in the central region (Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma) and 4.6% in the southeast region (Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia). Seroreactivity to E. ewingii was also highest in the central region (14.6%) followed by the southeast region (5.9%). The geospatial pattern derived from E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii seropositive samples was similar to previous reports based on E. chaffeensis seroreactivity in white-tailed deer and the distribution of human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) cases reported by the CDC. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide the first large scale regional documentation of exposure to E. canis, E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii in pet dogs, highlighting regional differences in seroprevalence and providing the basis for heightened awareness of these emerging vector-borne pathogens by veterinarians and public health agencies. BioMed Central 2012-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3298699/ /pubmed/22316160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-29 Text en Copyright ©2012 Beall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Beall, Melissa J Alleman, A Rick Breitschwerdt, Ed B Cohn, Leah A Couto, C Guillermo Dryden, Michael W Guptill, Lynn C Iazbik, Cristina Kania, Stephen A Lathan, Patty Little, Susan E Roy, Alma Sayler, Katherine A Stillman, Brett A Welles, Elizabeth G Wolfson, Wendy Yabsley, Michael J Seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii in dogs in North America |
title | Seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii in dogs in North America |
title_full | Seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii in dogs in North America |
title_fullStr | Seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii in dogs in North America |
title_full_unstemmed | Seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii in dogs in North America |
title_short | Seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii in dogs in North America |
title_sort | seroprevalence of ehrlichia canis, ehrlichia chaffeensis and ehrlichia ewingii in dogs in north america |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3298699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22316160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-29 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beallmelissaj seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT allemanarick seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT breitschwerdtedb seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT cohnleaha seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT coutocguillermo seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT drydenmichaelw seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT guptilllynnc seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT iazbikcristina seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT kaniastephena seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT lathanpatty seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT littlesusane seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT royalma seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT saylerkatherinea seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT stillmanbretta seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT welleselizabethg seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT wolfsonwendy seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica AT yabsleymichaelj seroprevalenceofehrlichiacanisehrlichiachaffeensisandehrlichiaewingiiindogsinnorthamerica |