Cargando…

Development of an automated method to detect sitting pivot transfer phases using biomechanical variables: toward a standardized method

BACKGROUND: Sitting pivot transfer (SPT) is one of the most important, but at the same time strenuous at the upper extremity, functional task for spinal cord injured individuals. In order to better teach this task to those individuals and to improve performance, a better biomechanical understanding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desroches, Guillaume, Vermette, Martin, Gourdou, Philippe, Gagnon, Dany
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3298704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22305052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-7
_version_ 1782226027505778688
author Desroches, Guillaume
Vermette, Martin
Gourdou, Philippe
Gagnon, Dany
author_facet Desroches, Guillaume
Vermette, Martin
Gourdou, Philippe
Gagnon, Dany
author_sort Desroches, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sitting pivot transfer (SPT) is one of the most important, but at the same time strenuous at the upper extremity, functional task for spinal cord injured individuals. In order to better teach this task to those individuals and to improve performance, a better biomechanical understanding during the different SPT phases is a prerequisite. However, no consensus has yet been reached on how to depict the different phases of the SPT. The definition of the phases of the SPT, along with the events characterizing these phases, will facilitate the interpretation of biomechanical outcome measures related to the performance of SPTs as well as strengthen the evidence generated across studies. METHODS: Thirty-five individuals with a spinal cord injury performed two SPTs between seats of similar height using their usual SPT technique. Kinematics and kinetics were recorded using an instrumented transfer assessment system. Based on kinetic and kinematic measurements, a relative threshold-based algorithm was developed to identify four distinct phases: pre-lift, upper arm loading, lift-pivot and post-lift phases. To determine the stability of the algorithm between the two SPTs, Student t-tests for dependent samples were performed on the absolute duration of each phase. RESULTS: The mean total duration of the SPT was 2.00 ± 0.49 s. The mean duration of the pre-lift, upper arm loading, lift-pivot and post-lift phases were 0.74 ± 0.29 s, 0.28 ± 0.13 s, 0.72 ± 0.24 s, 0.27 ± 0.14 s whereas their relative contributions represented approximately 35%, 15%, 35% and 15% of the overall SPT cycle, respectively. No significant differences were found between the trials (p = 0.480-0.891). CONCLUSION: The relative threshold-based algorithm used to automatically detect the four distinct phases of the SPT, is rapid, accurate and repeatable. A quantitative and thorough description of the precise phases of the SPT is prerequisite to better interpret biomechanical findings and measure task performance. The algorithm could also become clinically useful to refine the assessment and training of SPTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3298704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32987042012-03-11 Development of an automated method to detect sitting pivot transfer phases using biomechanical variables: toward a standardized method Desroches, Guillaume Vermette, Martin Gourdou, Philippe Gagnon, Dany J Neuroeng Rehabil Methodology BACKGROUND: Sitting pivot transfer (SPT) is one of the most important, but at the same time strenuous at the upper extremity, functional task for spinal cord injured individuals. In order to better teach this task to those individuals and to improve performance, a better biomechanical understanding during the different SPT phases is a prerequisite. However, no consensus has yet been reached on how to depict the different phases of the SPT. The definition of the phases of the SPT, along with the events characterizing these phases, will facilitate the interpretation of biomechanical outcome measures related to the performance of SPTs as well as strengthen the evidence generated across studies. METHODS: Thirty-five individuals with a spinal cord injury performed two SPTs between seats of similar height using their usual SPT technique. Kinematics and kinetics were recorded using an instrumented transfer assessment system. Based on kinetic and kinematic measurements, a relative threshold-based algorithm was developed to identify four distinct phases: pre-lift, upper arm loading, lift-pivot and post-lift phases. To determine the stability of the algorithm between the two SPTs, Student t-tests for dependent samples were performed on the absolute duration of each phase. RESULTS: The mean total duration of the SPT was 2.00 ± 0.49 s. The mean duration of the pre-lift, upper arm loading, lift-pivot and post-lift phases were 0.74 ± 0.29 s, 0.28 ± 0.13 s, 0.72 ± 0.24 s, 0.27 ± 0.14 s whereas their relative contributions represented approximately 35%, 15%, 35% and 15% of the overall SPT cycle, respectively. No significant differences were found between the trials (p = 0.480-0.891). CONCLUSION: The relative threshold-based algorithm used to automatically detect the four distinct phases of the SPT, is rapid, accurate and repeatable. A quantitative and thorough description of the precise phases of the SPT is prerequisite to better interpret biomechanical findings and measure task performance. The algorithm could also become clinically useful to refine the assessment and training of SPTs. BioMed Central 2012-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3298704/ /pubmed/22305052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-7 Text en Copyright ©2012 Desroches et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Desroches, Guillaume
Vermette, Martin
Gourdou, Philippe
Gagnon, Dany
Development of an automated method to detect sitting pivot transfer phases using biomechanical variables: toward a standardized method
title Development of an automated method to detect sitting pivot transfer phases using biomechanical variables: toward a standardized method
title_full Development of an automated method to detect sitting pivot transfer phases using biomechanical variables: toward a standardized method
title_fullStr Development of an automated method to detect sitting pivot transfer phases using biomechanical variables: toward a standardized method
title_full_unstemmed Development of an automated method to detect sitting pivot transfer phases using biomechanical variables: toward a standardized method
title_short Development of an automated method to detect sitting pivot transfer phases using biomechanical variables: toward a standardized method
title_sort development of an automated method to detect sitting pivot transfer phases using biomechanical variables: toward a standardized method
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3298704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22305052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-7
work_keys_str_mv AT desrochesguillaume developmentofanautomatedmethodtodetectsittingpivottransferphasesusingbiomechanicalvariablestowardastandardizedmethod
AT vermettemartin developmentofanautomatedmethodtodetectsittingpivottransferphasesusingbiomechanicalvariablestowardastandardizedmethod
AT gourdouphilippe developmentofanautomatedmethodtodetectsittingpivottransferphasesusingbiomechanicalvariablestowardastandardizedmethod
AT gagnondany developmentofanautomatedmethodtodetectsittingpivottransferphasesusingbiomechanicalvariablestowardastandardizedmethod