Cargando…

"GOLD or lower limit of normal definition? a comparison with expert-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a prospective cohort-study"

BACKGROUND: The Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) defines COPD as a fixed post-bronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) below 0.7. Age-dependent cut-off values below the lower fifth percentile (LLN) of this ratio de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Güder, Gülmisal, Brenner, Susanne, Angermann, Christiane E, Ertl, Georg, Held, Matthias, Sachs, Alfred P, Lammers, Jan-Willem, Zanen, Pieter, Hoes, Arno W, Störk, Stefan, Rutten, Frans H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3299632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22309369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-13-13
_version_ 1782226136517836800
author Güder, Gülmisal
Brenner, Susanne
Angermann, Christiane E
Ertl, Georg
Held, Matthias
Sachs, Alfred P
Lammers, Jan-Willem
Zanen, Pieter
Hoes, Arno W
Störk, Stefan
Rutten, Frans H
author_facet Güder, Gülmisal
Brenner, Susanne
Angermann, Christiane E
Ertl, Georg
Held, Matthias
Sachs, Alfred P
Lammers, Jan-Willem
Zanen, Pieter
Hoes, Arno W
Störk, Stefan
Rutten, Frans H
author_sort Güder, Gülmisal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) defines COPD as a fixed post-bronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) below 0.7. Age-dependent cut-off values below the lower fifth percentile (LLN) of this ratio derived from the general population have been proposed as an alternative. We wanted to assess the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic capability of the GOLD and LLN definition when compared to an expert-based diagnosis. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, 405 patients aged ≥ 65 years with a general practitioner's diagnosis of COPD were recruited and followed up for 4.5 (median; quartiles 3.9; 5.1) years. Prevalence rates of COPD according to GOLD and three LLN definitions and diagnostic performance measurements were calculated. The reference standard was the diagnosis of COPD of an expert panel that used all available diagnostic information, including spirometry and bodyplethysmography. RESULTS: Compared to the expert panel diagnosis, 'GOLD-COPD' misclassified 69 (28%) patients, and the three LLNs misclassified 114 (46%), 96 (39%), and 98 (40%) patients, respectively. The GOLD classification led to more false positives, the LLNs to more false negative diagnoses. The main predictors beyond the FEV1/FVC ratio for an expert diagnosis of COPD were the FEV1 % predicted, and the residual volume/total lung capacity ratio (RV/TLC). Adding FEV1 and RV/TLC to GOLD or LLN improved the diagnostic accuracy, resulting in a significant reduction of up to 50% of the number of misdiagnoses. The expert diagnosis of COPD better predicts exacerbations, hospitalizations and mortality than GOLD or LLN. CONCLUSIONS: GOLD criteria over-diagnose COPD, while LLN definitions under-diagnose COPD in elderly patients as compared to an expert panel diagnosis. Incorporating FEV1 and RV/TLC into the GOLD-COPD or LLN-based definition brings both definitions closer to expert panel diagnosis of COPD, and to daily clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3299632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32996322012-03-13 "GOLD or lower limit of normal definition? a comparison with expert-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a prospective cohort-study" Güder, Gülmisal Brenner, Susanne Angermann, Christiane E Ertl, Georg Held, Matthias Sachs, Alfred P Lammers, Jan-Willem Zanen, Pieter Hoes, Arno W Störk, Stefan Rutten, Frans H Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: The Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) defines COPD as a fixed post-bronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) below 0.7. Age-dependent cut-off values below the lower fifth percentile (LLN) of this ratio derived from the general population have been proposed as an alternative. We wanted to assess the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic capability of the GOLD and LLN definition when compared to an expert-based diagnosis. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, 405 patients aged ≥ 65 years with a general practitioner's diagnosis of COPD were recruited and followed up for 4.5 (median; quartiles 3.9; 5.1) years. Prevalence rates of COPD according to GOLD and three LLN definitions and diagnostic performance measurements were calculated. The reference standard was the diagnosis of COPD of an expert panel that used all available diagnostic information, including spirometry and bodyplethysmography. RESULTS: Compared to the expert panel diagnosis, 'GOLD-COPD' misclassified 69 (28%) patients, and the three LLNs misclassified 114 (46%), 96 (39%), and 98 (40%) patients, respectively. The GOLD classification led to more false positives, the LLNs to more false negative diagnoses. The main predictors beyond the FEV1/FVC ratio for an expert diagnosis of COPD were the FEV1 % predicted, and the residual volume/total lung capacity ratio (RV/TLC). Adding FEV1 and RV/TLC to GOLD or LLN improved the diagnostic accuracy, resulting in a significant reduction of up to 50% of the number of misdiagnoses. The expert diagnosis of COPD better predicts exacerbations, hospitalizations and mortality than GOLD or LLN. CONCLUSIONS: GOLD criteria over-diagnose COPD, while LLN definitions under-diagnose COPD in elderly patients as compared to an expert panel diagnosis. Incorporating FEV1 and RV/TLC into the GOLD-COPD or LLN-based definition brings both definitions closer to expert panel diagnosis of COPD, and to daily clinical practice. BioMed Central 2012 2012-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3299632/ /pubmed/22309369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-13-13 Text en Copyright ©2012 Güder et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Güder, Gülmisal
Brenner, Susanne
Angermann, Christiane E
Ertl, Georg
Held, Matthias
Sachs, Alfred P
Lammers, Jan-Willem
Zanen, Pieter
Hoes, Arno W
Störk, Stefan
Rutten, Frans H
"GOLD or lower limit of normal definition? a comparison with expert-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a prospective cohort-study"
title "GOLD or lower limit of normal definition? a comparison with expert-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a prospective cohort-study"
title_full "GOLD or lower limit of normal definition? a comparison with expert-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a prospective cohort-study"
title_fullStr "GOLD or lower limit of normal definition? a comparison with expert-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a prospective cohort-study"
title_full_unstemmed "GOLD or lower limit of normal definition? a comparison with expert-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a prospective cohort-study"
title_short "GOLD or lower limit of normal definition? a comparison with expert-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a prospective cohort-study"
title_sort "gold or lower limit of normal definition? a comparison with expert-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a prospective cohort-study"
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3299632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22309369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-13-13
work_keys_str_mv AT gudergulmisal goldorlowerlimitofnormaldefinitionacomparisonwithexpertbaseddiagnosisofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT brennersusanne goldorlowerlimitofnormaldefinitionacomparisonwithexpertbaseddiagnosisofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT angermannchristianee goldorlowerlimitofnormaldefinitionacomparisonwithexpertbaseddiagnosisofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT ertlgeorg goldorlowerlimitofnormaldefinitionacomparisonwithexpertbaseddiagnosisofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT heldmatthias goldorlowerlimitofnormaldefinitionacomparisonwithexpertbaseddiagnosisofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sachsalfredp goldorlowerlimitofnormaldefinitionacomparisonwithexpertbaseddiagnosisofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT lammersjanwillem goldorlowerlimitofnormaldefinitionacomparisonwithexpertbaseddiagnosisofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT zanenpieter goldorlowerlimitofnormaldefinitionacomparisonwithexpertbaseddiagnosisofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT hoesarnow goldorlowerlimitofnormaldefinitionacomparisonwithexpertbaseddiagnosisofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT storkstefan goldorlowerlimitofnormaldefinitionacomparisonwithexpertbaseddiagnosisofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT ruttenfransh goldorlowerlimitofnormaldefinitionacomparisonwithexpertbaseddiagnosisofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinaprospectivecohortstudy