Cargando…
Effectiveness of IV Cannulation Skills Laboratory Training and Its Transfer into Clinical Practice: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of skills laboratory training is widely recognized. Yet, the transfer of procedural skills acquired in skills laboratories into clinical practice has rarely been investigated. We conducted a prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial to evaluate, if student...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3299804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22427895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032831 |
_version_ | 1782226176465436672 |
---|---|
author | Lund, Frederike Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik Maatouk, Imad Krautter, Markus Möltner, Andreas Werner, Anne Weyrich, Peter Jünger, Jana Nikendei, Christoph |
author_facet | Lund, Frederike Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik Maatouk, Imad Krautter, Markus Möltner, Andreas Werner, Anne Weyrich, Peter Jünger, Jana Nikendei, Christoph |
author_sort | Lund, Frederike |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of skills laboratory training is widely recognized. Yet, the transfer of procedural skills acquired in skills laboratories into clinical practice has rarely been investigated. We conducted a prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial to evaluate, if students having trained intravenous (IV) cannulation in a skills laboratory are rated as more professional regarding technical and communication skills compared to students who underwent bedside teaching when assessed objectively by independent video assessors and subjectively by patients. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: 84 volunteer first-year medical students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Three drop-outs occurred. The intervention group (IG; n = 41) trained IV cannulation in a skills laboratory receiving instruction after Peyton's ‘Four-Step Approach’. The control group (CG; n = 40) received a bedside teaching session with volunteer students acting as patients. Afterwards, performance of IV cannulation of both groups in a clinical setting with students acting as patients was video-recorded. Two independent, blinded video assessors scored students' performance using binary checklists (BC) and the Integrated Procedural Protocol Instrument (IPPI). Patients assessed students' performance with the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) and a modified IPPI. IG required significantly shorter time needed for the performance on a patient (IG: 595.4 SD(188.1)s; CG: 692.7 SD(247.8)s; 95%CI 23.5 s to 45.1 s; p = 0.049) and completed significantly more single steps of the procedure correctly (IG: 64% SD(14) for BC items; CG: 53% SD(18); 95%CI 10.25% to 11.75%; p = 0.004). IG also scored significantly better on IPPI ratings (median: IG: 3.1; CG: 3.6; p = 0.015;). Rated by patients, students' performance and patient-physician communication did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of IV cannulation-related skills acquired in a skills laboratory is superior to bedside teaching when rated by independent video raters by means of IPPI and BC. It enables students to perform IV cannulation more professionally on volunteer students acting as patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3299804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32998042012-03-16 Effectiveness of IV Cannulation Skills Laboratory Training and Its Transfer into Clinical Practice: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Lund, Frederike Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik Maatouk, Imad Krautter, Markus Möltner, Andreas Werner, Anne Weyrich, Peter Jünger, Jana Nikendei, Christoph PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of skills laboratory training is widely recognized. Yet, the transfer of procedural skills acquired in skills laboratories into clinical practice has rarely been investigated. We conducted a prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial to evaluate, if students having trained intravenous (IV) cannulation in a skills laboratory are rated as more professional regarding technical and communication skills compared to students who underwent bedside teaching when assessed objectively by independent video assessors and subjectively by patients. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: 84 volunteer first-year medical students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Three drop-outs occurred. The intervention group (IG; n = 41) trained IV cannulation in a skills laboratory receiving instruction after Peyton's ‘Four-Step Approach’. The control group (CG; n = 40) received a bedside teaching session with volunteer students acting as patients. Afterwards, performance of IV cannulation of both groups in a clinical setting with students acting as patients was video-recorded. Two independent, blinded video assessors scored students' performance using binary checklists (BC) and the Integrated Procedural Protocol Instrument (IPPI). Patients assessed students' performance with the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) and a modified IPPI. IG required significantly shorter time needed for the performance on a patient (IG: 595.4 SD(188.1)s; CG: 692.7 SD(247.8)s; 95%CI 23.5 s to 45.1 s; p = 0.049) and completed significantly more single steps of the procedure correctly (IG: 64% SD(14) for BC items; CG: 53% SD(18); 95%CI 10.25% to 11.75%; p = 0.004). IG also scored significantly better on IPPI ratings (median: IG: 3.1; CG: 3.6; p = 0.015;). Rated by patients, students' performance and patient-physician communication did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of IV cannulation-related skills acquired in a skills laboratory is superior to bedside teaching when rated by independent video raters by means of IPPI and BC. It enables students to perform IV cannulation more professionally on volunteer students acting as patients. Public Library of Science 2012-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3299804/ /pubmed/22427895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032831 Text en Lund et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lund, Frederike Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik Maatouk, Imad Krautter, Markus Möltner, Andreas Werner, Anne Weyrich, Peter Jünger, Jana Nikendei, Christoph Effectiveness of IV Cannulation Skills Laboratory Training and Its Transfer into Clinical Practice: A Randomized, Controlled Trial |
title | Effectiveness of IV Cannulation Skills Laboratory Training and Its Transfer into Clinical Practice: A Randomized, Controlled Trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of IV Cannulation Skills Laboratory Training and Its Transfer into Clinical Practice: A Randomized, Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of IV Cannulation Skills Laboratory Training and Its Transfer into Clinical Practice: A Randomized, Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of IV Cannulation Skills Laboratory Training and Its Transfer into Clinical Practice: A Randomized, Controlled Trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of IV Cannulation Skills Laboratory Training and Its Transfer into Clinical Practice: A Randomized, Controlled Trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of iv cannulation skills laboratory training and its transfer into clinical practice: a randomized, controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3299804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22427895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032831 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lundfrederike effectivenessofivcannulationskillslaboratorytraininganditstransferintoclinicalpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schultzjobsthendrik effectivenessofivcannulationskillslaboratorytraininganditstransferintoclinicalpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT maatoukimad effectivenessofivcannulationskillslaboratorytraininganditstransferintoclinicalpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT krauttermarkus effectivenessofivcannulationskillslaboratorytraininganditstransferintoclinicalpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT moltnerandreas effectivenessofivcannulationskillslaboratorytraininganditstransferintoclinicalpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT werneranne effectivenessofivcannulationskillslaboratorytraininganditstransferintoclinicalpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weyrichpeter effectivenessofivcannulationskillslaboratorytraininganditstransferintoclinicalpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jungerjana effectivenessofivcannulationskillslaboratorytraininganditstransferintoclinicalpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nikendeichristoph effectivenessofivcannulationskillslaboratorytraininganditstransferintoclinicalpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial |