Cargando…

Can radiographers reliably read screening mammograms?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Wivell, G, Harvey, I, Curtin, J, Denton, E
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2000
Materias:	Meeting Abstract
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3300318/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr217

Ejemplares similares

How do radiographers compare to radiologists when double reading screening mammograms
por: Inglis, J, et al.
Publicado: (2000)

Changes in reporting practices with time when radiographers and radiologists double read screening mammograms
por: Eve, CB, et al.
Publicado: (2002)

Comparison of image quality between mammograms performed by an assistant practitioner and by screening radiographers
por: Tuson, AE, et al.
Publicado: (2002)

Evaluation of three different resolution workstations for reporting computerised radiography mammographic images
por: Denton, ERE, et al.
Publicado: (2002)

Image features of true positive and false negative cancers in screening mammograms
por: Meeson, S, et al.
Publicado: (2002)

Evaluation of the need for magnification views in the assessment of calcification in computerised mammography
por: Wivell, G, et al.
Publicado: (2002)

Investigation into possible causes of blurring in mammograms
por: Seddon, D, et al.
Publicado: (2000)

Evaluating radiographers' diagnostic accuracy in screen-reading mammograms: what constitutes a quality study?
por: Debono, Josephine C, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Using new technology to achieve the ideal mammogram
por: Young, KC
Publicado: (2000)

Impact of the second reader on screening outcome at blinded double reading of digital screening mammograms
por: Coolen, Angela M. P., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Prediction of the underlying histology from the mammogram: mammographic-large section histologic correlation of >1000 open surgical biopsies
por: Tabár, L
Publicado: (2000)

An evaluation of the current role of radiographer film readers in breast screening
por: Williams, B, et al.
Publicado: (2002)

Consensus approach to discrepancies arising from independent double reading of screening mammograms
por: Hiscock, R, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Can clinicians reliably estimate cardiac output in children?
por: Tibby, S, et al.
Publicado: (1997)

Reliability of radiologists’ first impression when interpreting a screening mammogram
por: Gandomkar, Ziba, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cost-Effectiveness of Double Reading versus Single Reading of Mammograms in a Breast Cancer Screening Programme
por: Posso, Margarita, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Automatic detection of anomalies in screening mammograms
por: Kendall, Edward J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A machine learning model based on readers’ characteristics to predict their performances in reading screening mammograms
por: Gandomkar, Ziba, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Australian women's judgements about using artificial intelligence to read mammograms in breast cancer screening
por: Carter, Stacy M, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Who does what? Comments from radiographers
por: Cush, SJ
Publicado: (2000)

Can ultrasound reliably localise radial scars (RS)/complex sclerosing lesions (CSL) prior to excision biopsy?
por: Windmill, DC, et al.
Publicado: (2002)

Setting up an efficient and reliable screening method for novel c-Jun N-terminal kinase substrates
por: Kallunki, T, et al.
Publicado: (2000)

A radiographer's perspective of sentinel lymph node biopsy
por: Pendry, SD
Publicado: (2000)

Progress report on integrating skill mix: the radiographer's perspective
por: Young, B
Publicado: (2002)

Assessing an individual's film reading ability
por: Gale, A
Publicado: (2000)

A framework for personalized mammogram screening
por: Pal Mudaranthakam, Dinesh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The establishment of an assessment method for radiographers to undertake mammographic image interpretation and reporting
por: Horrocks, J
Publicado: (2002)

Are there demographic differences in film reading skill?
por: Gale, AG, et al.
Publicado: (2002)

The lateral arm for stereotactic biopsy: how good is it?
por: Denton, E, et al.
Publicado: (2000)

Cervical cancer in Malaysia: can we improve our screening and preventive practice?
por: Varatharajan, Shanthi, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

EHMTI-0285. Frontal thermography in healthy individuals: reliability of the method
por: Voiticovschi-Iosob, C, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Possible strategies for use of artificial intelligence in screen-reading of mammograms, based on retrospective data from 122,969 screening examinations
por: Larsen, Marthe, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comments from a breast clinician
por: Denton, EMC
Publicado: (2000)

Progress report on integrating skill mix: the radiologist's perspective
por: Denton, ERE
Publicado: (2002)

Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms
por: Sharma, Nisha, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Can patients screen themselves? Pilot study of an audio-guided computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) approach to screening for substance use in primary care
por: McNeely, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

TRIP: a method for novel transcript reconstruction from paired-end RNA-seq reads
por: Mangul, Serghei, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Fatigue and performance in interpreting breast screening mammograms
por: Taylor-Phillips, S, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Classification of micro-calcification in mammograms using scalable linear Fisher discriminant analysis
por: Suhail, Zobia, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Respiratory rate - interobserver reliability study
por: Brodersen, Jacob B, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_rrk65rbrqah4v53h66cucbtpm7