Cargando…
Blood substitutes consumption and coagulation changes: 200/0.5 vs 130/0.4 hydroxyethyl starch administration
Autores principales: | Costa, MG, Pompei, L, Coccia, C, Della Rocca, G |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3301554/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1998 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?
por: Haase, Nicolai, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Assessment of coagulation with 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in cesarean section
por: Oh, Chung-Sik, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Effects of synthetic colloids on oxidative stress and inflammatory response in hemorrhagic shock: comparison of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4, hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5, and succinylated gelatin
por: Chen, Gan, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
The impact of 30 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery
por: Staikou, Chryssoula, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 induces more renal macrophage infiltration than hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 in an isolated renal perfusion model
por: Hüter, L, et al.
Publicado: (2008)