Cargando…

Impact of Generic Alendronate Cost on the Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment

INTRODUCTION: Since alendronate became available in generic form in the Unites States in 2008, its price has been decreasing. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of alendronate cost on the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening and treatment in postmenopausal women. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nayak, Smita, Roberts, Mark S., Greenspan, Susan L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22427903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032879
_version_ 1782226675772162048
author Nayak, Smita
Roberts, Mark S.
Greenspan, Susan L.
author_facet Nayak, Smita
Roberts, Mark S.
Greenspan, Susan L.
author_sort Nayak, Smita
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Since alendronate became available in generic form in the Unites States in 2008, its price has been decreasing. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of alendronate cost on the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening and treatment in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Microsimulation cost-effectiveness model of osteoporosis screening and treatment for U.S. women age 65 and older. We assumed screening initiation at age 65 with central dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and alendronate treatment for individuals with osteoporosis; with a comparator of “no screening” and treatment only after fracture occurrence. We evaluated annual alendronate costs of $20 through $800; outcome measures included fractures; nursing home admission; medication adverse events; death; costs; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs); and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2010 U.S. dollars per QALY gained. A lifetime time horizon was used, and direct costs were included. Base-case and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Base-case analysis results showed that at annual alendronate costs of $200 or less, osteoporosis screening followed by treatment was cost-saving, resulting in lower total costs than no screening as well as more QALYs (10.6 additional quality-adjusted life-days). When assuming alendronate costs of $400 through $800, screening and treatment resulted in greater lifetime costs than no screening but was highly cost-effective, with ICERs ranging from $714 per QALY gained through $13,902 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening followed by alendronate treatment was robust to joint input parameter estimate variation at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY at all alendronate costs evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis screening followed by alendronate treatment is effective and highly cost-effective for postmenopausal women across a range of alendronate costs, and may be cost-saving at annual alendronate costs of $200 or less.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3302782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33027822012-03-16 Impact of Generic Alendronate Cost on the Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment Nayak, Smita Roberts, Mark S. Greenspan, Susan L. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Since alendronate became available in generic form in the Unites States in 2008, its price has been decreasing. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of alendronate cost on the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening and treatment in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Microsimulation cost-effectiveness model of osteoporosis screening and treatment for U.S. women age 65 and older. We assumed screening initiation at age 65 with central dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and alendronate treatment for individuals with osteoporosis; with a comparator of “no screening” and treatment only after fracture occurrence. We evaluated annual alendronate costs of $20 through $800; outcome measures included fractures; nursing home admission; medication adverse events; death; costs; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs); and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2010 U.S. dollars per QALY gained. A lifetime time horizon was used, and direct costs were included. Base-case and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Base-case analysis results showed that at annual alendronate costs of $200 or less, osteoporosis screening followed by treatment was cost-saving, resulting in lower total costs than no screening as well as more QALYs (10.6 additional quality-adjusted life-days). When assuming alendronate costs of $400 through $800, screening and treatment resulted in greater lifetime costs than no screening but was highly cost-effective, with ICERs ranging from $714 per QALY gained through $13,902 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening followed by alendronate treatment was robust to joint input parameter estimate variation at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY at all alendronate costs evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis screening followed by alendronate treatment is effective and highly cost-effective for postmenopausal women across a range of alendronate costs, and may be cost-saving at annual alendronate costs of $200 or less. Public Library of Science 2012-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3302782/ /pubmed/22427903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032879 Text en Nayak et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nayak, Smita
Roberts, Mark S.
Greenspan, Susan L.
Impact of Generic Alendronate Cost on the Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment
title Impact of Generic Alendronate Cost on the Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment
title_full Impact of Generic Alendronate Cost on the Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment
title_fullStr Impact of Generic Alendronate Cost on the Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Generic Alendronate Cost on the Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment
title_short Impact of Generic Alendronate Cost on the Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment
title_sort impact of generic alendronate cost on the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening and treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22427903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032879
work_keys_str_mv AT nayaksmita impactofgenericalendronatecostonthecosteffectivenessofosteoporosisscreeningandtreatment
AT robertsmarks impactofgenericalendronatecostonthecosteffectivenessofosteoporosisscreeningandtreatment
AT greenspansusanl impactofgenericalendronatecostonthecosteffectivenessofosteoporosisscreeningandtreatment