Cargando…

Uterine Rupture by Intended Mode of Delivery in the UK: A National Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND: Recent reports of the risk of morbidity due to uterine rupture are thought to have contributed in some countries to a decrease in the number of women attempting a vaginal birth after caesarean section. The aims of this study were to estimate the incidence of true uterine rupture in the U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fitzpatrick, Kathryn E., Kurinczuk, Jennifer J., Alfirevic, Zarko, Spark, Patsy, Brocklehurst, Peter, Knight, Marian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22427745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001184
_version_ 1782226690597978112
author Fitzpatrick, Kathryn E.
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J.
Alfirevic, Zarko
Spark, Patsy
Brocklehurst, Peter
Knight, Marian
author_facet Fitzpatrick, Kathryn E.
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J.
Alfirevic, Zarko
Spark, Patsy
Brocklehurst, Peter
Knight, Marian
author_sort Fitzpatrick, Kathryn E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent reports of the risk of morbidity due to uterine rupture are thought to have contributed in some countries to a decrease in the number of women attempting a vaginal birth after caesarean section. The aims of this study were to estimate the incidence of true uterine rupture in the UK and to investigate and quantify the associated risk factors and outcomes, on the basis of intended mode of delivery. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A UK national case-control study was undertaken between April 2009 and April 2010. The participants comprised 159 women with uterine rupture and 448 control women with a previous caesarean delivery. The estimated incidence of uterine rupture was 0.2 per 1,000 maternities overall; 2.1 and 0.3 per 1,000 maternities in women with a previous caesarean delivery planning vaginal or elective caesarean delivery, respectively. Amongst women with a previous caesarean delivery, odds of rupture were also increased in women who had ≥ two previous caesarean deliveries (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.02, 95% CI 1.16–7.85) and <12 months since their last caesarean delivery (aOR 3.12, 95% CI 1.62–6.02). A higher risk of rupture with labour induction and oxytocin use was apparent (aOR 3.92, 95% CI 1.00–15.33). Two women with uterine rupture died (case fatality 1.3%, 95% CI 0.2–4.5%). There were 18 perinatal deaths associated with uterine rupture among 145 infants (perinatal mortality 124 per 1,000 total births, 95% CI 75–189). CONCLUSIONS: Although uterine rupture is associated with significant mortality and morbidity, even amongst women with a previous caesarean section planning a vaginal delivery, it is a rare occurrence. For women with a previous caesarean section, risk of uterine rupture increases with number of previous caesarean deliveries, a short interval since the last caesarean section, and labour induction and/or augmentation. These factors should be considered when counselling and managing the labour of women with a previous caesarean section. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3302846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33028462012-03-16 Uterine Rupture by Intended Mode of Delivery in the UK: A National Case-Control Study Fitzpatrick, Kathryn E. Kurinczuk, Jennifer J. Alfirevic, Zarko Spark, Patsy Brocklehurst, Peter Knight, Marian PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent reports of the risk of morbidity due to uterine rupture are thought to have contributed in some countries to a decrease in the number of women attempting a vaginal birth after caesarean section. The aims of this study were to estimate the incidence of true uterine rupture in the UK and to investigate and quantify the associated risk factors and outcomes, on the basis of intended mode of delivery. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A UK national case-control study was undertaken between April 2009 and April 2010. The participants comprised 159 women with uterine rupture and 448 control women with a previous caesarean delivery. The estimated incidence of uterine rupture was 0.2 per 1,000 maternities overall; 2.1 and 0.3 per 1,000 maternities in women with a previous caesarean delivery planning vaginal or elective caesarean delivery, respectively. Amongst women with a previous caesarean delivery, odds of rupture were also increased in women who had ≥ two previous caesarean deliveries (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.02, 95% CI 1.16–7.85) and <12 months since their last caesarean delivery (aOR 3.12, 95% CI 1.62–6.02). A higher risk of rupture with labour induction and oxytocin use was apparent (aOR 3.92, 95% CI 1.00–15.33). Two women with uterine rupture died (case fatality 1.3%, 95% CI 0.2–4.5%). There were 18 perinatal deaths associated with uterine rupture among 145 infants (perinatal mortality 124 per 1,000 total births, 95% CI 75–189). CONCLUSIONS: Although uterine rupture is associated with significant mortality and morbidity, even amongst women with a previous caesarean section planning a vaginal delivery, it is a rare occurrence. For women with a previous caesarean section, risk of uterine rupture increases with number of previous caesarean deliveries, a short interval since the last caesarean section, and labour induction and/or augmentation. These factors should be considered when counselling and managing the labour of women with a previous caesarean section. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Public Library of Science 2012-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3302846/ /pubmed/22427745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001184 Text en Fitzpatrick et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fitzpatrick, Kathryn E.
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J.
Alfirevic, Zarko
Spark, Patsy
Brocklehurst, Peter
Knight, Marian
Uterine Rupture by Intended Mode of Delivery in the UK: A National Case-Control Study
title Uterine Rupture by Intended Mode of Delivery in the UK: A National Case-Control Study
title_full Uterine Rupture by Intended Mode of Delivery in the UK: A National Case-Control Study
title_fullStr Uterine Rupture by Intended Mode of Delivery in the UK: A National Case-Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Uterine Rupture by Intended Mode of Delivery in the UK: A National Case-Control Study
title_short Uterine Rupture by Intended Mode of Delivery in the UK: A National Case-Control Study
title_sort uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the uk: a national case-control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22427745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001184
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzpatrickkathryne uterinerupturebyintendedmodeofdeliveryintheukanationalcasecontrolstudy
AT kurinczukjenniferj uterinerupturebyintendedmodeofdeliveryintheukanationalcasecontrolstudy
AT alfireviczarko uterinerupturebyintendedmodeofdeliveryintheukanationalcasecontrolstudy
AT sparkpatsy uterinerupturebyintendedmodeofdeliveryintheukanationalcasecontrolstudy
AT brocklehurstpeter uterinerupturebyintendedmodeofdeliveryintheukanationalcasecontrolstudy
AT knightmarian uterinerupturebyintendedmodeofdeliveryintheukanationalcasecontrolstudy