Cargando…

Comparative Tuberculosis (TB) Prevention Effectiveness in Children of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Vaccines from Different Sources, Kazakhstan

BACKGROUND: Except during a 1-year period when BCG vaccine was not routinely administered, annual coverage of infants with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in Kazakhstan since 2002 has exceeded 95%. BCG preparations from different sources (Japan, Serbia, and Russia) or none were used exclusively in co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Favorov, Michael, Ali, Mohammad, Tursunbayeva, Aigul, Aitmagambetova, Indira, Kilgore, Paul, Ismailov, Shakhimurat, Chorba, Terence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22427854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032567
_version_ 1782226701229490176
author Favorov, Michael
Ali, Mohammad
Tursunbayeva, Aigul
Aitmagambetova, Indira
Kilgore, Paul
Ismailov, Shakhimurat
Chorba, Terence
author_facet Favorov, Michael
Ali, Mohammad
Tursunbayeva, Aigul
Aitmagambetova, Indira
Kilgore, Paul
Ismailov, Shakhimurat
Chorba, Terence
author_sort Favorov, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Except during a 1-year period when BCG vaccine was not routinely administered, annual coverage of infants with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in Kazakhstan since 2002 has exceeded 95%. BCG preparations from different sources (Japan, Serbia, and Russia) or none were used exclusively in comparable 7-month time-frames, September through March, in 4 successive years beginning in 2002. Our objective was to assess relative effectiveness of BCG immunization. METHODS/FINDINGS: We compared outcomes of birth cohorts from the 4 time-frames retrospectively. Three cohorts received vaccine from one of three manufacturers exclusively, and one cohort was not vaccinated. Cohorts were followed for 3 years for notifications of clinical TB and of culture-confirmed TB, and for 21 months for TB meningitis notifications. Prevention effectiveness based on relative risk of TB incidence was calculated for each vaccinated cohort compared to the non-vaccinated cohort. Although there were differences in prevention effectiveness observed among the three BCG vaccines, all were protective. The Japanese vaccine (currently used in Kazakhstan), the Serbian vaccine, and the Russian vaccine respectively were 69%, 43%, and 22% effective with respect to clinical TB notifications, and 92%, 82%, and 51% effective with respect to culture confirmed TB. All three vaccines were >70% effective with respect to TB meningitis. LIMITATIONS: Potential limitations included considerations that 1) the methodology used was retrospective, 2) multiple risk factors could have varied between cohorts and affected prevention effectiveness measures, 3) most cases were clinically diagnosed, and TB culture-positive case numbers and TB meningitis case numbers were sparse, and 4) small variations in reported population TB burden could have affected relative risk of exposure for cohorts. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: All three BCG vaccines evaluated were protective against TB, and prevention effectiveness varied by manufacturer. When setting national immunization policy, consideration should be given to prevention effectiveness of BCG preparations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3302895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33028952012-03-16 Comparative Tuberculosis (TB) Prevention Effectiveness in Children of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Vaccines from Different Sources, Kazakhstan Favorov, Michael Ali, Mohammad Tursunbayeva, Aigul Aitmagambetova, Indira Kilgore, Paul Ismailov, Shakhimurat Chorba, Terence PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Except during a 1-year period when BCG vaccine was not routinely administered, annual coverage of infants with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in Kazakhstan since 2002 has exceeded 95%. BCG preparations from different sources (Japan, Serbia, and Russia) or none were used exclusively in comparable 7-month time-frames, September through March, in 4 successive years beginning in 2002. Our objective was to assess relative effectiveness of BCG immunization. METHODS/FINDINGS: We compared outcomes of birth cohorts from the 4 time-frames retrospectively. Three cohorts received vaccine from one of three manufacturers exclusively, and one cohort was not vaccinated. Cohorts were followed for 3 years for notifications of clinical TB and of culture-confirmed TB, and for 21 months for TB meningitis notifications. Prevention effectiveness based on relative risk of TB incidence was calculated for each vaccinated cohort compared to the non-vaccinated cohort. Although there were differences in prevention effectiveness observed among the three BCG vaccines, all were protective. The Japanese vaccine (currently used in Kazakhstan), the Serbian vaccine, and the Russian vaccine respectively were 69%, 43%, and 22% effective with respect to clinical TB notifications, and 92%, 82%, and 51% effective with respect to culture confirmed TB. All three vaccines were >70% effective with respect to TB meningitis. LIMITATIONS: Potential limitations included considerations that 1) the methodology used was retrospective, 2) multiple risk factors could have varied between cohorts and affected prevention effectiveness measures, 3) most cases were clinically diagnosed, and TB culture-positive case numbers and TB meningitis case numbers were sparse, and 4) small variations in reported population TB burden could have affected relative risk of exposure for cohorts. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: All three BCG vaccines evaluated were protective against TB, and prevention effectiveness varied by manufacturer. When setting national immunization policy, consideration should be given to prevention effectiveness of BCG preparations. Public Library of Science 2012-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3302895/ /pubmed/22427854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032567 Text en This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Favorov, Michael
Ali, Mohammad
Tursunbayeva, Aigul
Aitmagambetova, Indira
Kilgore, Paul
Ismailov, Shakhimurat
Chorba, Terence
Comparative Tuberculosis (TB) Prevention Effectiveness in Children of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Vaccines from Different Sources, Kazakhstan
title Comparative Tuberculosis (TB) Prevention Effectiveness in Children of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Vaccines from Different Sources, Kazakhstan
title_full Comparative Tuberculosis (TB) Prevention Effectiveness in Children of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Vaccines from Different Sources, Kazakhstan
title_fullStr Comparative Tuberculosis (TB) Prevention Effectiveness in Children of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Vaccines from Different Sources, Kazakhstan
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Tuberculosis (TB) Prevention Effectiveness in Children of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Vaccines from Different Sources, Kazakhstan
title_short Comparative Tuberculosis (TB) Prevention Effectiveness in Children of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Vaccines from Different Sources, Kazakhstan
title_sort comparative tuberculosis (tb) prevention effectiveness in children of bacillus calmette-guérin (bcg) vaccines from different sources, kazakhstan
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22427854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032567
work_keys_str_mv AT favorovmichael comparativetuberculosistbpreventioneffectivenessinchildrenofbacilluscalmetteguerinbcgvaccinesfromdifferentsourceskazakhstan
AT alimohammad comparativetuberculosistbpreventioneffectivenessinchildrenofbacilluscalmetteguerinbcgvaccinesfromdifferentsourceskazakhstan
AT tursunbayevaaigul comparativetuberculosistbpreventioneffectivenessinchildrenofbacilluscalmetteguerinbcgvaccinesfromdifferentsourceskazakhstan
AT aitmagambetovaindira comparativetuberculosistbpreventioneffectivenessinchildrenofbacilluscalmetteguerinbcgvaccinesfromdifferentsourceskazakhstan
AT kilgorepaul comparativetuberculosistbpreventioneffectivenessinchildrenofbacilluscalmetteguerinbcgvaccinesfromdifferentsourceskazakhstan
AT ismailovshakhimurat comparativetuberculosistbpreventioneffectivenessinchildrenofbacilluscalmetteguerinbcgvaccinesfromdifferentsourceskazakhstan
AT chorbaterence comparativetuberculosistbpreventioneffectivenessinchildrenofbacilluscalmetteguerinbcgvaccinesfromdifferentsourceskazakhstan