Cargando…

Feasibility of FRAX for Prediction of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Korea

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and limitations of fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) for osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the Korean population. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The FRAX algorithm is country specific and uses clinical risk factor data to calculate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: So, Gwang-Young, Park, Kyung-Ho, Yoon, Dea-Hyun, Ryu, Ji-Hoon, Choi, Yong-Soo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22439084
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2012.6.1.22
_version_ 1782226704625827840
author So, Gwang-Young
Park, Kyung-Ho
Yoon, Dea-Hyun
Ryu, Ji-Hoon
Choi, Yong-Soo
author_facet So, Gwang-Young
Park, Kyung-Ho
Yoon, Dea-Hyun
Ryu, Ji-Hoon
Choi, Yong-Soo
author_sort So, Gwang-Young
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and limitations of fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) for osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the Korean population. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The FRAX algorithm is country specific and uses clinical risk factor data to calculate an individual patient's 10-year probability of hip fracture and 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture. However, it has not been adequately investigated for Korean. METHODS: One hundred ninety four patients who had all risk factor data for the calculation of FRAX were divided into two groups depending on the existence of vertebral fractures: the fracture group was comprised of 88 patients and the non-facture group comprised of 105 patients. We analyzed prediction of the fracture by applying respectively the Korean, Japanese, USA and UK model, and compared their FRAX results by calculating lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) instead of femoral neck BMD. RESULTS: The prediction of vertebral fracture using FRAX was 10.9 ± 6.2% in the fracture group, 9.5 ± 5.5% of the non-fracture group in the Korean model (p = 0.108); 17.9 ± 10.2% in the fracture group, 14.6 ± 9.0% in the non-fracture group in the Japanese model (p = 0.017). Only the Japanese model exhibited significant difference in vertebral fracture risk. The prediction of vertebral fracture using lumbar BMD instead of femoral neck BMD was 19.5 ± 12.1% in the fracture group, 16.0 ± 10.3% in the non-fracture group in the Korean model (p = 0.029). All models had statistically significant differences for the prediction of osteoporotic vertebral fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The 10-year probability of osteoporotic vertebral fracture had underestimation of the risk considering treatment eligibility based on the National Osteoporosis Foundation guidelines. BMD that accurately reflects the contribution of each result to fracture risk should be preferred for the prediction of fracture using FRAX, when lumbar spine and hip BMD measurements are both performed for clinical purposes in Korean.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3302911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33029112012-03-21 Feasibility of FRAX for Prediction of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Korea So, Gwang-Young Park, Kyung-Ho Yoon, Dea-Hyun Ryu, Ji-Hoon Choi, Yong-Soo Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and limitations of fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) for osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the Korean population. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The FRAX algorithm is country specific and uses clinical risk factor data to calculate an individual patient's 10-year probability of hip fracture and 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture. However, it has not been adequately investigated for Korean. METHODS: One hundred ninety four patients who had all risk factor data for the calculation of FRAX were divided into two groups depending on the existence of vertebral fractures: the fracture group was comprised of 88 patients and the non-facture group comprised of 105 patients. We analyzed prediction of the fracture by applying respectively the Korean, Japanese, USA and UK model, and compared their FRAX results by calculating lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) instead of femoral neck BMD. RESULTS: The prediction of vertebral fracture using FRAX was 10.9 ± 6.2% in the fracture group, 9.5 ± 5.5% of the non-fracture group in the Korean model (p = 0.108); 17.9 ± 10.2% in the fracture group, 14.6 ± 9.0% in the non-fracture group in the Japanese model (p = 0.017). Only the Japanese model exhibited significant difference in vertebral fracture risk. The prediction of vertebral fracture using lumbar BMD instead of femoral neck BMD was 19.5 ± 12.1% in the fracture group, 16.0 ± 10.3% in the non-fracture group in the Korean model (p = 0.029). All models had statistically significant differences for the prediction of osteoporotic vertebral fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The 10-year probability of osteoporotic vertebral fracture had underestimation of the risk considering treatment eligibility based on the National Osteoporosis Foundation guidelines. BMD that accurately reflects the contribution of each result to fracture risk should be preferred for the prediction of fracture using FRAX, when lumbar spine and hip BMD measurements are both performed for clinical purposes in Korean. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2012-03 2012-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3302911/ /pubmed/22439084 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2012.6.1.22 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
So, Gwang-Young
Park, Kyung-Ho
Yoon, Dea-Hyun
Ryu, Ji-Hoon
Choi, Yong-Soo
Feasibility of FRAX for Prediction of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Korea
title Feasibility of FRAX for Prediction of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Korea
title_full Feasibility of FRAX for Prediction of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Korea
title_fullStr Feasibility of FRAX for Prediction of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Korea
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of FRAX for Prediction of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Korea
title_short Feasibility of FRAX for Prediction of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Korea
title_sort feasibility of frax for prediction of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in korea
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22439084
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2012.6.1.22
work_keys_str_mv AT sogwangyoung feasibilityoffraxforpredictionofosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinkorea
AT parkkyungho feasibilityoffraxforpredictionofosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinkorea
AT yoondeahyun feasibilityoffraxforpredictionofosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinkorea
AT ryujihoon feasibilityoffraxforpredictionofosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinkorea
AT choiyongsoo feasibilityoffraxforpredictionofosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinkorea